5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Stages rather than ages in the acquisition of movement structures: Data from sentence repetition and 27696 spontaneous clauses

      1 , 1
      Glossa: a journal of general linguistics
      Open Library of the Humanities

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This study explored the order of acquisition of various types of syntactic-movement and embedding structures in Hebrew, using a sentence-repetition task, in which 60 children aged 2;2-3;10 repeated 80 sentences (with a total of 4800 sentences), and an analysis of the spontaneous speech of 61 children aged 1;6-6;1 (27,696 clauses). The sentence repetition task revealed a set order of acquisition of the various types of syntactic movement: A-movement is acquired first, then A-bar-movement, and finally movement of the verb to C. The analysis of spontaneous speech revealed the same order: A-movement of the object of unaccusative verbs to subject position appears first, together with simple SV sentences; then, wh-questions appear, then relative clauses and topicalization, which appear together with embedding of finite clauses, and lastly, V-to-C movement. Previous studies have shown that Hebrew speakers under age six have difficulty comprehending and producing sentences with A-bar-movement in which a lexically-restricted object crosses over a lexically-restricted subject. And indeed, whereas children produced A-bar structures very early (wh-questions from age 1;6, relative-clauses and topicalization from age 2;6), until age 5;8 these structures never included a lexical DP crossing over another lexical DP. Both tasks indicated that the order of structure acquisition is fixed, creating Guttman scales between structures, but different children acquire the same structure at very different ages. It seems that whereas the syntactic path and the stages of structure acquisition along it are constant between children, each child walks this path in their own pace.

          Related collections

          Most cited references131

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A Basis for Scaling Qualitative Data

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book: not found

            The Antisymmetry of Syntax

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book: not found

              Italian Syntax

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Glossa: a journal of general linguistics
                Open Library of the Humanities
                2397-1835
                March 4 2020
                December 23 2021
                : 39
                : 1
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Tel Aviv University
                Article
                10.16995/glossa.5716
                6762746e-0735-453c-931b-7e63ac5cdeb0
                © 2021

                https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

                Product
                Self URI (article page): https://www.glossa-journal.org/article/id/5716/

                Comments

                Comment on this article