24
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Genomic DNA Methylation-Derived Algorithm Enables Accurate Detection of Malignant Prostate Tissues

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          The current methodology involving diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) relies on the pathology examination of prostate needle biopsies, a method with high false negative rates partly due to temporospatial, molecular, and morphological heterogeneity of prostate adenocarcinoma. It is postulated that molecular markers have a potential to assign diagnosis to a considerable portion of undetected prostate tumors. This study examines the genome-wide DNA methylation changes in PCa in search of genomic markers for the development of a diagnostic algorithm for PCa screening.

          Methods

          Archival PCa and normal tissues were assessed using genomic DNA methylation arrays. Differentially methylated sites and regions (DMRs) were used for functional assessment, gene-set enrichment and protein interaction analyses, and examination of transcription factor-binding patterns. Raw signal intensity data were used for identification of recurrent copy number variations (CNVs). Non-redundant fully differentiating cytosine-phosphate-guanine sites (CpGs), which did not overlap CNV segments, were used in an L1 regularized logistic regression model (LASSO) to train a classification algorithm. Validation of this algorithm was performed using a large external cohort of benign and tumor prostate arrays.

          Results

          Approximately 6,000 probes and 600 genomic regions showed significant DNA methylation changes, primarily involving hypermethylation. Gene-set enrichment and protein interaction analyses found an overrepresentation of genes related to cell communications, neurogenesis, and proliferation. Motif enrichment analysis demonstrated enrichment of tumor suppressor-binding sites nearby DMRs. Several of these regions were also found to contain copy number amplifications. Using four non-redundant fully differentiating CpGs, we trained a classification model with 100% accuracy in discriminating tumors from benign samples. Validation of this algorithm using an external cohort of 234 tumors and 92 benign samples yielded 96% sensitivity and 98% specificity. The model was found to be highly sensitive to detect metastatic lesions in bone, lymph node, and soft tissue, while being specific enough to differentiate the benign hyperplasia of prostate from tumor.

          Conclusion

          A considerable component of PCa DNA methylation profile represent driver events potentially established/maintained by disruption of tumor suppressor activity. As few as four CpGs from this profile can be used for screening of PCa.

          Related collections

          Most cited references44

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          missMethyl: an R package for analyzing data from Illumina's HumanMethylation450 platform.

          DNA methylation is one of the most commonly studied epigenetic modifications due to its role in both disease and development. The Illumina HumanMethylation450 BeadChip is a cost-effective way to profile >450 000 CpGs across the human genome, making it a popular platform for profiling DNA methylation. Here we introduce missMethyl, an R package with a suite of tools for performing normalization, removal of unwanted variation in differential methylation analysis, differential variability testing and gene set analysis for the 450K array.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Bump hunting to identify differentially methylated regions in epigenetic epidemiology studies.

            During the past 5 years, high-throughput technologies have been successfully used by epidemiology studies, but almost all have focused on sequence variation through genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Today, the study of other genomic events is becoming more common in large-scale epidemiological studies. Many of these, unlike the single-nucleotide polymorphism studied in GWAS, are continuous measures. In this context, the exercise of searching for regions of interest for disease is akin to the problems described in the statistical 'bump hunting' literature. New statistical challenges arise when the measurements are continuous rather than categorical, when they are measured with uncertainty, and when both biological signal, and measurement errors are characterized by spatial correlation along the genome. Perhaps the most challenging complication is that continuous genomic data from large studies are measured throughout long periods, making them susceptible to 'batch effects'. An example that combines all three characteristics is genome-wide DNA methylation measurements. Here, we present a data analysis pipeline that effectively models measurement error, removes batch effects, detects regions of interest and attaches statistical uncertainty to identified regions. We illustrate the usefulness of our approach by detecting genomic regions of DNA methylation associated with a continuous trait in a well-characterized population of newborns. Additionally, we show that addressing unexplained heterogeneity like batch effects reduces the number of false-positive regions. Our framework offers a comprehensive yet flexible approach for identifying genomic regions of biological interest in large epidemiological studies using quantitative high-throughput methods.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Cancer-related axonogenesis and neurogenesis in prostate cancer.

              Perineural invasion is the only interaction between cancer cells and nerves studied to date. It is a symbiotic relationship between cancer and nerves that results in growth advantage for both. In this article, we present data on a novel biological phenomenon, cancer-related axonogenesis and neurogenesis. We identify spatial and temporal associations between increased nerve density and preneoplastic and neoplastic lesions of the human prostate. Nerve density was increased in cancer areas as well as in preneoplastic lesions compared with controls. Two- and three-dimensional reconstructions of entire prostates confirmed axonogenesis in human tumors. Furthermore, patients with prostate cancer had increased numbers of neurons in their prostatic ganglia compared with controls, corroborating neurogenesis. Finally, two in vitro models confirmed that cancer cells, particularly when interacting with nerves in perineural invasion, induce neurite outgrowth in prostate cancer. Neurogenesis is correlated with features of aggressive prostate cancer and with recurrence in prostate cancer. We also present a putative regulatory mechanism based on semaphorin 4F (S4F). S4F is overexpressed in cancers cells in the perineural in vitro model. Overexpression of S4F in prostate cancer cells induces neurogenesis in the N1E-115 neurogenesis assay and S4F inhibition by small interfering RNA blocks this effect. This is the first description of cancer-related neurogenesis and its putative regulatory mechanism.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Oncol
                Front Oncol
                Front. Oncol.
                Frontiers in Oncology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2234-943X
                23 April 2018
                2018
                : 8
                : 100
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Western University , London, ON, Canada
                [2] 2Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Molecular Diagnostics Division, London Health Sciences , London, ON, Canada
                [3] 3Department of Pediatrics, Western University and Children’s Health Research Institute , London, ON, Canada
                [4] 4Department of Biochemistry, Western University and Children’s Health Research Institute , London, ON, Canada
                [5] 5Department of Oncology, Western University and Children’s Health Research Institute , London, ON, Canada
                [6] 6Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, McMaster University , Hamilton, ON, Canada
                Author notes

                Edited by: Fabio Grizzi, Humanitas Research Hospital, Italy

                Reviewed by: Hung-Ming Lam, University of Washington, United States; Felix K. H. Chun, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany

                *Correspondence: Bekim Sadikovic, bekim.sadikovic@ 123456lhsc.on.ca

                Specialty section: This article was submitted to Genitourinary Oncology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Oncology

                Article
                10.3389/fonc.2018.00100
                5925605
                29740534
                67ac8353-899f-412e-b1a3-43c3e2d09620
                Copyright © 2018 Aref-Eshghi, Schenkel, Ainsworth, Lin, Rodenhiser, Cutz and Sadikovic.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 17 January 2018
                : 21 March 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 59, Pages: 13, Words: 8632
                Categories
                Oncology
                Original Research

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                prostate cancer,dna methylation,protein interaction,transcription factor binding,copy number variation,differentially methylated regions,machine learning,lasso

                Comments

                Comment on this article