52
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Reward vs. Retaliation—the Role of the Mesocorticolimbic Salience Network in Human Reactive Aggression

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The propensity for reactive aggression (RA) which occurs in response to provocation has been linked to hyperresponsivity of the mesocorticolimbic reward network in healthy adults. Here, we aim to elucidate the role of the mesocorticolimbic network in clinically significant RA for two competing motivated behaviors, reward-seeking vs. retaliation. 18 male participants performed a variant of the Point-Subtraction Aggression Paradigm (PSAP) during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). We examined whether RA participants compared with non-aggressive controls would choose to obtain a monetary reward over the opportunity to retaliate against a fictitious opponent, who provoked the participant by randomly stealing money from his earnings. Across all fMRI-PSAP runs, RA individuals vs. controls chose to work harder to earn money but not to retaliate. When engaging in such reward-seeking behavior vs. retaliation in a single fMRI-PSAP run, RA individuals exhibited increased activation in the insular-striatal part of the mesocorticolimbic salience network, and decreased precuneus and ventromedial prefrontal cortex activation compared to controls. Enhanced overall reward-seeking behavior along with an up-regulation of the mesocorticolimbic salience network and a down-regulation of the default-mode network in RA individuals indicate that RA individuals are willing to work more for monetary reward than for retaliation when presented with a choice. Our findings may suggest that the use of positive reinforcement might represent an efficacious intervention approach for the potential reduction of retaliatory behavior in clinically significant RA.

          Related collections

          Most cited references46

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Anger is an approach-related affect: evidence and implications.

          The authors review a range of evidence concerning the motivational underpinnings of anger as an affect, with particular reference to the relationship between anger and anxiety or fear. The evidence supports the view that anger relates to an appetitive or approach motivational system, whereas anxiety relates to an aversive or avoidance motivational system. This evidence appears to have 2 implications. One implication concerns the nature of anterior cortical asymmetry effects. The evidence suggests that such asymmetry reflects direction of motivational engagement (approach vs. withdrawal) rather than affective valence. The other implication concerns the idea that affects form a purely positive dimension and a purely negative dimension, which reflect the operation of appetitive and aversive motivational systems, respectively. The evidence reviewed does not support that view. The evidence is, however, consistent with a discrete-emotions view (which does not rely on dimensionality) and with an alternative dimensional approach. (c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Common and distinct networks underlying reward valence and processing stages: a meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies.

            To better understand the reward circuitry in human brain, we conducted activation likelihood estimation (ALE) and parametric voxel-based meta-analyses (PVM) on 142 neuroimaging studies that examined brain activation in reward-related tasks in healthy adults. We observed several core brain areas that participated in reward-related decision making, including the nucleus accumbens (NAcc), caudate, putamen, thalamus, orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), bilateral anterior insula, anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and posterior cingulate cortex (PCC), as well as cognitive control regions in the inferior parietal lobule and prefrontal cortex (PFC). The NAcc was commonly activated by both positive and negative rewards across various stages of reward processing (e.g., anticipation, outcome, and evaluation). In addition, the medial OFC and PCC preferentially responded to positive rewards, whereas the ACC, bilateral anterior insula, and lateral PFC selectively responded to negative rewards. Reward anticipation activated the ACC, bilateral anterior insula, and brain stem, whereas reward outcome more significantly activated the NAcc, medial OFC, and amygdala. Neurobiological theories of reward-related decision making should therefore take distributed and interrelated representations of reward valuation and valence assessment into account. Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Dysfunction in the neural circuitry of emotion regulation--a possible prelude to violence.

              Emotion is normally regulated in the human brain by a complex circuit consisting of the orbital frontal cortex, amygdala, anterior cingulate cortex, and several other interconnected regions. There are both genetic and environmental contributions to the structure and function of this circuitry. We posit that impulsive aggression and violence arise as a consequence of faulty emotion regulation. Indeed, the prefrontal cortex receives a major serotonergic projection, which is dysfunctional in individuals who show impulsive violence. Individuals vulnerable to faulty regulation of negative emotion are at risk for violence and aggression. Research on the neural circuitry of emotion regulation suggests new avenues of intervention for such at-risk populations.

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Behav Neurosci
                Front Behav Neurosci
                Front. Behav. Neurosci.
                Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1662-5153
                27 September 2016
                2016
                : 10
                : 179
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York, NY, USA
                [2] 2Division of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Lindenwood University-Belleville Belleville, IL, USA
                [3] 3Psychiatry, Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond, VA, USA
                [4] 4Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Houston, TX, USA
                Author notes

                Edited by: Carmen Sandi, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Switzerland

                Reviewed by: Alicia Izquierdo, University of California, Los Angeles, USA; Ulrike M. Krämer, University of Lübeck, Germany

                *Correspondence: Nelly Alia-Klein nelly.alia-klein@ 123456mssm.edu
                Article
                10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00179
                5037197
                27729852
                680de09c-cec5-4f24-a96e-c20310ca0890
                Copyright © 2016 Gan, Preston-Campbell, Moeller, Steinberg, Lane, Maloney, Parvaz, Goldstein and Alia-Klein.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 04 April 2016
                : 09 September 2016
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 3, Equations: 0, References: 71, Pages: 12, Words: 9234
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institute of Mental Health 10.13039/100000025
                Funded by: National Institute on Drug Abuse 10.13039/100000026
                Funded by: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism 10.13039/100000027
                Categories
                Neuroscience
                Original Research

                Neurosciences
                reactive aggression,intermittent explosive disorder,point-subtraction aggression paradigm,reward,salience,mesocorticolimbic network

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log