Cerebrospinal fluid volumetric net flow rate and direction in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to examine cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) volumetric net flow rate and direction at the cranio-cervical junction (CCJ) and cerebral aqueduct in individuals with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) using cardiac-gated phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (PC-MRI). An in-depth, pixel-by-pixel analysis of regions of interest from the CCJ and cerebral aqueduct, respectively, was done in 26 iNPH individuals, and in 4 healthy subjects for validation purposes. Results from patients were compared with over-night measurements of static and pulsatile intracranial pressure (ICP). In iNPH, CSF net flow at CCJ was cranially directed in 17/22 as well as in 4/4 healthy subjects. Estimated daily CSF volumetric net flow rate at CCJ was 6.9 ± 9.9 L/24 h in iNPH patients and 4.5 ± 5.0 L/24 h in healthy individuals. Within the cerebral aqueduct, the CSF net flow was antegrade in 7/21 iNPH patients and in 4/4 healthy subjects, while it was retrograde (i.e. towards ventricles) in 14/21 iNPH patients. Estimated daily CSF volumetric net flow rate in cerebral aqueduct was 1.1 ± 2.2 L/24 h in iNPH while 295 ± 53 mL/24 h in healthy individuals. Magnitude of cranially directed CSF net flow in cerebral aqueduct was highest in iNPH individuals with signs of impaired intracranial compliance. The study results indicate CSF flow volumes and direction that are profoundly different from previously assumed. We hypothesize that spinal CSF formation may serve to buffer increased demand for CSF flow through the glymphatic system during sleep and during deep inspiration to compensate for venous outflow.

Graphical abstract

Highlights

• •

  CSF flow was examined in the cranio-cervical junction and the cerebral aqueduct.

• •

  Phase-contrast MRI and in-depth pixel-pixel analysis of ROIs was performed.

• •

  There is redistribution of CSF flow in patients with iNPH.

• •

  The CSF flow volume and direction are different from previously assumed.

• •

  The observations indicate a role of spinal CSF formation.