44
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Identification of Novel Tumor-Associated Cell Surface Sialoglycoproteins in Human Glioblastoma Tumors Using Quantitative Proteomics

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Glioblastoma multiform (GBM) remains clinical indication with significant “unmet medical need”. Innovative new therapy to eliminate residual tumor cells and prevent tumor recurrences is critically needed for this deadly disease. A major challenge of GBM research has been the identification of novel molecular therapeutic targets and accurate diagnostic/prognostic biomarkers. Many of the current clinical therapeutic targets of immunotoxins and ligand-directed toxins for high-grade glioma (HGG) cells are surface sialylated glycoproteins. Therefore, methods that systematically and quantitatively analyze cell surface sialoglycoproteins in human clinical tumor samples would be useful for the identification of potential diagnostic markers and therapeutic targets for malignant gliomas. In this study, we used the bioorthogonal chemical reporter strategy (BOCR) in combination with label-free quantitative mass spectrometry (LFQ-MS) to characterize and accurately quantify the individual cell surface sialoproteome in human GBM tissues, in fetal, adult human astrocytes, and in human neural progenitor cells (NPCs). We identified and quantified a total of 843 proteins, including 801 glycoproteins. Among the 843 proteins, 606 (72%) are known cell surface or secreted glycoproteins, including 156 CD-antigens, all major classes of cell surface receptor proteins, transporters, and adhesion proteins. Our findings identified several known as well as new cell surface antigens whose expression is predominantly restricted to human GBM tumors as confirmed by microarray transcription profiling, quantitative RT-PCR and immunohistochemical staining. This report presents the comprehensive identification of new biomarkers and therapeutic targets for the treatment of malignant gliomas using quantitative sialoglycoproteomics with clinically relevant, patient derived primary glioma cells.

          Related collections

          Most cited references76

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          From Mechanism to Mouse: A Tale of Two Bioorthogonal Reactions

          Bioorthogonal reactions are chemical reactions that neither interact with nor interfere with a biological system. The participating functional groups must be inert to biological moieties, must selectively reactive with each other under biocompatible conditions, and, for in vivo applications, must be nontoxic to cells and organisms. Additionally, it is helpful if one reactive group is small and therefore minimally perturbing of a biomolecule into which it has been introduced either chemically or biosynthetically. Examples from the past decade suggest that a promising strategy for bioorthogonal reaction development begins with an analysis of functional group and reactivity space outside those defined by Nature. Issues such as stability of reactants and products (particularly in water), kinetics, and unwanted side reactivity with biofunctionalities must be addressed, ideally guided by detailed mechanistic studies. Finally, the reaction must be tested in a variety of environments, escalating from aqueous media to biomolecule solutions to cultured cells and, for the most optimized transformations, to live organisms. Work in our laboratory led to the development of two bioorthogonal transformations that exploit the azide as a small, abiotic, and bioinert reaction partner: the Staudinger ligation and strain-promoted azide–alkyne cycloaddition. The Staudinger ligation is based on the classic Staudinger reduction of azides with triarylphosphines first reported in 1919. In the ligation reaction, the intermediate aza-ylide undergoes intramolecular reaction with an ester, forming an amide bond faster than aza-ylide hydrolysis would otherwise occur in water. The Staudinger ligation is highly selective and reliably forms its product in environs as demanding as live mice. However, the Staudinger ligation has some liabilities, such as the propensity of phosphine reagents to undergo air oxidation and the relatively slow kinetics of the reaction. The Staudinger ligation takes advantage of the electrophilicity of the azide; however, the azide can also participate in cycloaddition reactions. In 1961, Wittig and Krebs noted that the strained, cyclic alkyne cyclooctyne reacts violently when combined neat with phenyl azide, forming a triazole product by 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition. This observation stood in stark contrast to the slow kinetics associated with 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition of azides with unstrained, linear alkynes, the conventional Huisgen process. Notably, the reaction of azides with terminal alkynes can be accelerated dramatically by copper catalysis (this highly popular Cu-catalyzed azide–alkyne cycloaddition (CuAAC) is a quintessential “click” reaction). However, the copper catalysts are too cytotoxic for long-term exposure with live cells or organisms. Thus, for applications of bioorthogonal chemistry in living systems, we built upon Wittig and Krebs’ observation with the design of cyclooctyne reagents that react rapidly and selectively with biomolecule-associated azides. This strain-promoted azide–alkyne cycloaddition is often referred to as “Cu-free click chemistry”. Mechanistic and theoretical studies inspired the design of a series of cyclooctyne compounds bearing fluorine substituents, fused rings, and judiciously situated heteroatoms, with the goals of optimizing azide cycloaddition kinetics, stability, solubility, and pharmacokinetic properties. Cyclooctyne reagents have now been used for labeling azide-modified biomolecules on cultured cells and in live Caenorhabditis elegans, zebrafish, and mice. As this special issue testifies, the field of bioorthogonal chemistry is firmly established as a challenging frontier of reaction methodology and an important new instrument for biological discovery. The above reactions, as well as several newcomers with bioorthogonal attributes, have enabled the high-precision chemical modification of biomolecules in vitro, as well as real-time visualization of molecules and processes in cells and live organisms. The consequence is an impressive body of new knowledge and technology, amassed using a relatively small bioorthogonal reaction compendium. Expansion of this toolkit, an effort that is already well underway, is an important objective for chemists and biologists alike.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Mammalian glycosylation in immunity.

            Glycosylation produces a diverse and abundant repertoire of glycans, which are collectively known as the glycome. Glycans are one of the four fundamental macromolecular components of all cells, and are highly regulated in the immune system. Their diversity reflects their multiple biological functions that encompass ligands for proteinaceous receptors known as lectins. Since the discovery that selectins and their glycan ligands are important for the regulation of leukocyte trafficking, it has been shown that additional features of the vertebrate immune system are also controlled by endogenous cellular glycosylation. This Review focuses on the emerging immunological roles of the mammalian glycome.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Phase III randomized trial of CED of IL13-PE38QQR vs Gliadel wafers for recurrent glioblastoma.

              Convection-enhanced delivery (CED) of cintredekin besudotox (CB) was compared with Gliadel wafers (GW) in adult patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) at first recurrence. Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive CB or GW. CB (0.5 microg/mL; total flow rate 0.75 mL/h) was administered over 96 hours via 2-4 intraparenchymal catheters placed after tumor resection. GW (3.85%/7.7 mg carmustine per wafer; maximum 8 wafers) were placed immediately after tumor resection. The primary endpoint was overall survival from the time of randomization. Prestated interim analyses were built into the study design. Secondary and tertiary endpoints were safety and health-related quality-of-life assessments. From March 2004 to December 2005, 296 patients were enrolled at 52 centers. Demographic and baseline characteristics were balanced between the 2 treatment arms. Median survival was 36.4 weeks (9.1 months) for CB and 35.3 weeks (8.8 months) for GW (P = .476). For the efficacy evaluable population, the median survival was 45.3 weeks (11.3 months) for CB and 39.8 weeks (10 months) for GW (P = .310). The adverse-events profile was similar in both arms, except that pulmonary embolism was higher in the CB arm (8% vs 1%, P = .014). This is the first randomized phase III evaluation of an agent administered via CED and the first with an active comparator in GBM patients. There was no survival difference between CB administered via CED and GW. Drug distribution was not assessed and may be crucial for evaluating future CED-based therapeutics.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1932-6203
                2014
                31 October 2014
                : 9
                : 10
                : e110316
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Sanofi-Aventis Recherche & Développement, Centre de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
                [2 ]ALS Therapy Development Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America
                [3 ]Department of Neurology, University of Rochester Medical Center, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, United States of America
                [4 ]Sanofi US, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America
                [5 ]Sanofi Tucson Research Center, Oro Valley, Arizona, United States of America
                University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors’ have the following interests: One or more of the authors have an affiliation to Sanofi who supported in part this research study. This study was supported in part by Sanofi. Co-authors François Autelitano, Denis Loyaux, Sébastien Roudières, Catherine Déon, Frédérique Guette, Philippe Fabre, Jean-Claude Guillemot and Pascual Ferrara are employed by Sanofi-Aventis Recherche & Développement. Co-author Sridaran Natesan is employed by Sanofi US. Co-authors Vasudeo Badarinarayana, Michael Smith and Paul August are employed by Sanofi Tucson Research Center. There are no patents, products in development or marketed products to declare. This does not alter authors’ adherence to all the PLoS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: P. Ferrara SN MS PA SAG JCG FA VB. Performed the experiments: SW RA SR QP CD FG P. Fabre VB. Analyzed the data: FA PA DL. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: SW RA SR QP CD FG P. Fabre VB. Contributed to the writing of the manuscript: FA PA.

                Article
                PONE-D-14-22726
                10.1371/journal.pone.0110316
                4216004
                25360666
                68614d04-66b8-45de-8aa6-34f521242147
                Copyright @ 2014

                This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

                History
                : 23 May 2014
                : 11 September 2014
                Page count
                Pages: 18
                Funding
                Work in the Steven A Goldman lab was supported by the Adelson Medical Research Foundation and the New York State Stem Cell Research Program (NYSTEM). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Sanofi supported in part the work performed in the Steven A Goldman lab by providing technical assistance and research materials. Co-authors François Autelitano, Denis Loyaux, Sébastien Roudières, Catherine Déon, Frédérique Guette, Philippe Fabre, Jean-Claude Guillemot and Pascual Ferrara are employed by Sanofi-Aventis Recherche & Développement. Co-author Sridaran Natesan is employed by Sanofi US. Co-authors Vasudeo Badarinarayana, Michael Smith and Paul August are employed by Sanofi Tucson Research Center. Sanofi provided support in the form of salaries for authors FA, DL, SR, CD, FG, PF, J-CG, PF, SN, VB, MS and PA but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Biochemistry
                Glycobiology
                Glycoproteins
                N-Linked Glycoproteins
                Glycosylation
                Proteomics
                Immunology
                Clinical Immunology
                Antibody Therapy
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Neurology
                Neurological Tumors
                Glioblastoma Multiforme
                Oncology
                Basic Cancer Research
                Cancer Drug Discovery
                Cancer Detection and Diagnosis
                Cancer Treatment
                Physical Sciences
                Chemistry
                Analytical Chemistry
                Mass Spectrometry
                Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry
                Custom metadata
                The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article