2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effect of Temperature Sensor Numbers and Placement on Aeration Cooling of a Stored Grain Mass Using a 3D Finite Element Model

      ,
      Agriculture
      MDPI AG

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Grain stored in silos in the United States of America is generally cooled with an aeration system to limit mold spoilage and insect infestation. Monitoring efficacy of aeration and real-time conditions of stored grain is generally done using temperature cables with fixed-spaced sensor locations that are hung from the roof of the silo. Numerous placement options exist in terms of the number of cables and their positions. However, little investigation has been done into the effects of cable placement on aeration system operation decisions and real-time monitoring of stored grain conditions. For a one-year period, the temperatures predicted by sensors in three recommended temperature cable configurations were evaluated for conditions in Ames, IA, USA. The average temperatures of each of the cable sensor configurations were lower than the average temperatures of the entire silo, with as much as an 11.4 °C difference. When sensor locations were used as inputs for aeration control, all cable sensor configurations predicted similar average temperatures. However, the temperature averages varied by as much as 3.6 °C depending on the temperature cable distribution chosen. Results demonstrated that temperature cables near the center or near the edges of the silos produce results that are not representative of the grain mass, resulting in less efficient aerations. Simulations were also conducted with randomized horizontal “wireless” sensor locations at fixed grain depths. The average temperatures were similar, but an increase in the number of sensors reduced variability between simulated storage years as the number of randomized sensors increased.

          Related collections

          Most cited references12

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Cooling bulk grain in the British climate to control storage insects and to improve keeping quality

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            DETECTION OF A DEVELOPING HOT SPOT IN STORED CORN WITH A CO2 SENSOR

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Sensitivity analysis of a fumigant movement and loss model for bulk stored grain to predict effects of environmental conditions and operational variables on fumigation efficacy

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                ABSGFK
                Agriculture
                Agriculture
                MDPI AG
                2077-0472
                March 2021
                March 10 2021
                : 11
                : 3
                : 231
                Article
                10.3390/agriculture11030231
                68619cc4-067b-47d1-b004-332ef8f5a962
                © 2021

                https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article