25
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Management of radiation oncology patients with a pacemaker or ICD: A new comprehensive practical guideline in The Netherlands

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Current clinical guidelines for the management of radiotherapy patients having either a pacemaker or implantable cardioverter defibrillator (both CIEDs: Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices) do not cover modern radiotherapy techniques and do not take the patient’s perspective into account. Available data on the frequency and cause of CIED failure during radiation therapy are limited and do not converge. The Dutch Society of Radiotherapy and Oncology (NVRO) initiated a multidisciplinary task group consisting of clinical physicists, cardiologists, radiation oncologists, pacemaker and ICD technologists to develop evidence based consensus guidelines for the management of CIED patients. CIED patients receiving radiotherapy should be categorised based on the chance of device failure and the clinical consequences in case of failure. Although there is no clear cut-off point nor a clear linear relationship, in general, chances of device failure increase with increasing doses. Clinical consequences of device failures like loss of pacing, carry the most risks in pacing dependent patients. Cumulative dose and pacing dependency have been combined to categorise patients into low, medium and high risk groups. Patients receiving a dose of less than 2 Gy to their CIED are categorised as low risk, unless pacing dependent since then they are medium risk. Between 2 and 10 Gy, all patients are categorised as medium risk, while above 10 Gy every patient is categorised as high risk. Measures to secure patient safety are described for each category. This guideline for the management of CIED patients receiving radiotherapy takes into account modern radiotherapy techniques, CIED technology, the patients’ perspective and the practical aspects necessary for the safe management of these patients. The guideline is implemented in The Netherlands in 2012 and is expected to find clinical acceptance outside The Netherlands as well.

          Related collections

          Most cited references44

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Transvenous lead extraction: Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus on facilities, training, indications, and patient management: this document was endorsed by the American Heart Association (AHA).

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found
            Is Open Access

            The management of imaging dose during image-guided radiotherapy: report of the AAPM Task Group 75.

            Radiographic image guidance has emerged as the new paradigm for patient positioning, target localization, and external beam alignment in radiotherapy. Although widely varied in modality and method, all radiographic guidance techniques have one thing in common--they can give a significant radiation dose to the patient. As with all medical uses of ionizing radiation, the general view is that this exposure should be carefully managed. The philosophy for dose management adopted by the diagnostic imaging community is summarized by the acronym ALARA, i.e., as low as reasonably achievable. But unlike the general situation with diagnostic imaging and image-guided surgery, image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) adds the imaging dose to an already high level of therapeutic radiation. There is furthermore an interplay between increased imaging and improved therapeutic dose conformity that suggests the possibility of optimizing rather than simply minimizing the imaging dose. For this reason, the management of imaging dose during radiotherapy is a different problem than its management during routine diagnostic or image-guided surgical procedures. The imaging dose received as part of a radiotherapy treatment has long been regarded as negligible and thus has been quantified in a fairly loose manner. On the other hand, radiation oncologists examine the therapy dose distribution in minute detail. The introduction of more intensive imaging procedures for IGRT now obligates the clinician to evaluate therapeutic and imaging doses in a more balanced manner. This task group is charged with addressing the issue of radiation dose delivered via image guidance techniques during radiotherapy. The group has developed this charge into three objectives: (1) Compile an overview of image-guidance techniques and their associated radiation dose levels, to provide the clinician using a particular set of image guidance techniques with enough data to estimate the total diagnostic dose for a specific treatment scenario, (2) identify ways to reduce the total imaging dose without sacrificing essential imaging information, and (3) recommend optimization strategies to trade off imaging dose with improvements in therapeutic dose delivery. The end goal is to enable the design of image guidance regimens that are as effective and efficient as possible.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The Heart Rhythm Society (HRS)/American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Expert Consensus Statement on the perioperative management of patients with implantable defibrillators, pacemakers and arrhythmia monitors: facilities and patient management this document was developed as a joint project with the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA), and in collaboration with the American Heart Association (AHA), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS).

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Radiat Oncol
                Radiat Oncol
                Radiation Oncology (London, England)
                BioMed Central
                1748-717X
                2012
                24 November 2012
                : 7
                : 198
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Department of Radiation Oncology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
                [2 ]Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [3 ]Verbeeten Instituut, Department of Radiation Oncology, Tilburg, The Netherlands
                [4 ]Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis, department of clinical physics, Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
                [5 ]Flevoziekenhuis, Department of Cardiology, Almere, The Netherlands
                [6 ]Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
                [7 ]Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
                [8 ]Dutch Society of Radiotherapy and Oncology (NVRO), Utrecht, The Netherlands
                [9 ]Dutch Society of Specialists in Invasive Heart Stimulation (VITHaS), Utrecht, The Netherlands
                [10 ]Dutch Society of Clinical Physics (NVKF), Utrecht, The Netherlands
                [11 ]Order of Medical Specialists (OMS), Utrecht, The Netherlands
                [12 ]Dutch Society of Cardiology (NVCC), Utrecht, The Netherlands
                Article
                1748-717X-7-198
                10.1186/1748-717X-7-198
                3528416
                23176563
                68698f7c-69f9-42be-ac5e-46bbfecc13ca
                Copyright ©2012 Hurkmans et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 24 July 2012
                : 21 November 2012
                Categories
                Review

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                implantable cardioverter defibrillator,risk management,cied,pacemaker,guideline

                Comments

                Comment on this article