95
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Research in action: using positive deviance to improve quality of health care

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Despite decades of efforts to improve quality of health care, poor performance persists in many aspects of care. Less than 1% of the enormous national investment in medical research is focused on improving health care delivery. Furthermore, when effective innovations in clinical care are discovered, uptake of these innovations is often delayed and incomplete. In this paper, we build on the established principle of 'positive deviance' to propose an approach to identifying practices that improve health care quality.

          Methods

          We synthesize existing literature on positive deviance, describe major alternative approaches, propose benefits and limitations of a positive deviance approach for research directed toward improving quality of health care, and describe an application of this approach in improving hospital care for patients with acute myocardial infarction.

          Results

          The positive deviance approach, as adapted for use in health care, presumes that the knowledge about 'what works' is available in existing organizations that demonstrate consistently exceptional performance. Steps in this approach: identify 'positive deviants,' i.e., organizations that consistently demonstrate exceptionally high performance in the area of interest ( e.g., proper medication use, timeliness of care); study the organizations in-depth using qualitative methods to generate hypotheses about practices that allow organizations to achieve top performance; test hypotheses statistically in larger, representative samples of organizations; and work in partnership with key stakeholders, including potential adopters, to disseminate the evidence about newly characterized best practices. The approach is particularly appropriate in situations where organizations can be ranked reliably based on valid performance measures, where there is substantial natural variation in performance within an industry, when openness about practices to achieve exceptional performance exists, and where there is an engaged constituency to promote uptake of discovered practices.

          Conclusion

          The identification and examination of health care organizations that demonstrate positive deviance provides an opportunity to characterize and disseminate strategies for improving quality.

          Related collections

          Most cited references77

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          ASSESSING THE WORK ENVIRONMENT FOR CREATIVITY.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book: not found

            Qualitative research and evaluation methods.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The Causal Texture of Organizational Environments

              F. Emery (1965)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Implement Sci
                Implementation Science : IS
                BioMed Central
                1748-5908
                2009
                8 May 2009
                : 4
                : 25
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Division of Health Policy and Administration, School of Public Health, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
                [2 ]Yale School of Management, New Haven, CT, USA
                [3 ]Section of Cardiovascular Medicine and the Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine; Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT, USA
                Article
                1748-5908-4-25
                10.1186/1748-5908-4-25
                2690576
                19426507
                68939fe7-a92d-4bea-b816-2223158fc422
                Copyright © 2009 Bradley et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 19 August 2008
                : 8 May 2009
                Categories
                Methodology

                Medicine
                Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article