4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Spinal cord stimulation in chronic pain: evidence and theory for mechanisms of action

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Well-established in the field of bioelectronic medicine, Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) offers an implantable, non-pharmacologic treatment for patients with intractable chronic pain conditions. Chronic pain is a widely heterogenous syndrome with regard to both pathophysiology and the resultant phenotype. Despite advances in our understanding of SCS-mediated antinociception, there still exists limited evidence clarifying the pathways recruited when patterned electric pulses are applied to the epidural space. The rapid clinical implementation of novel SCS methods including burst, high frequency and dorsal root ganglion SCS has provided the clinician with multiple options to treat refractory chronic pain. While compelling evidence for safety and efficacy exists in support of these novel paradigms, our understanding of their mechanisms of action (MOA) dramatically lags behind clinical data. In this review, we reconstruct the available basic science and clinical literature that offers support for mechanisms of both paresthesia spinal cord stimulation (P-SCS) and paresthesia-free spinal cord stimulation (PF-SCS). While P-SCS has been heavily examined since its inception, PF-SCS paradigms have recently been clinically approved with the support of limited preclinical research. Thus, wide knowledge gaps exist between their clinical efficacy and MOA. To close this gap, many rich investigative avenues for both P-SCS and PF-SCS are underway, which will further open the door for paradigm optimization, adjunctive therapies and new indications for SCS. As our understanding of these mechanisms evolves, clinicians will be empowered with the possibility of improving patient care using SCS to selectively target specific pathophysiological processes in chronic pain.

          Related collections

          Most cited references277

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Different immune cells mediate mechanical pain hypersensitivity in male and female mice.

          A large and rapidly increasing body of evidence indicates that microglia-to-neuron signaling is essential for chronic pain hypersensitivity. Using multiple approaches, we found that microglia are not required for mechanical pain hypersensitivity in female mice; female mice achieved similar levels of pain hypersensitivity using adaptive immune cells, likely T lymphocytes. This sexual dimorphism suggests that male mice cannot be used as proxies for females in pain research.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Tripartite synapses: glia, the unacknowledged partner.

            According to the classical view of the nervous system, the numerically superior glial cells have inferior roles in that they provide an ideal environment for neuronal-cell function. However, there is a wave of new information suggesting that glia are intimately involved in the active control of neuronal activity and synaptic neurotransmission. Recent evidence shows that glia respond to neuronal activity with an elevation of their internal Ca2+ concentration, which triggers the release of chemical transmitters from glia themselves and, in turn, causes feedback regulation of neuronal activity and synaptic strength. In view of these new insights, this article suggests that perisynaptic Schwann cells and synaptically associated astrocytes should be viewed as integral modulatory elements of tripartite synapses.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Chronic back pain is associated with decreased prefrontal and thalamic gray matter density.

              The role of the brain in chronic pain conditions remains speculative. We compared brain morphology of 26 chronic back pain (CBP) patients to matched control subjects, using magnetic resonance imaging brain scan data and automated analysis techniques. CBP patients were divided into neuropathic, exhibiting pain because of sciatic nerve damage, and non-neuropathic groups. Pain-related characteristics were correlated to morphometric measures. Neocortical gray matter volume was compared after skull normalization. Patients with CBP showed 5-11% less neocortical gray matter volume than control subjects. The magnitude of this decrease is equivalent to the gray matter volume lost in 10-20 years of normal aging. The decreased volume was related to pain duration, indicating a 1.3 cm3 loss of gray matter for every year of chronic pain. Regional gray matter density in 17 CBP patients was compared with matched controls using voxel-based morphometry and nonparametric statistics. Gray matter density was reduced in bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and right thalamus and was strongly related to pain characteristics in a pattern distinct for neuropathic and non-neuropathic CBP. Our results imply that CBP is accompanied by brain atrophy and suggest that the pathophysiology of chronic pain includes thalamocortical processes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                101660849
                43995
                Bioelectron Med
                Bioelectron Med
                Bioelectronic medicine
                2332-8886
                17 July 2019
                28 June 2019
                21 August 2019
                : 5
                : 10.1186/s42234-019-0023-1
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Anesthesiology, Center for Pain Medicine, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA.
                [2 ]VA Center of Excellence for Stress and Mental Health, VA San Diego Healthcare System, La Jolla, CA, USA.
                [3 ]Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA.
                [4 ]Department of Radiology, VA San Diego Healthcare System, La Jolla, CA, USA.
                [5 ]Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
                [6 ]Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
                [7 ]Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA.
                [8 ]Center for Pain Medicine, Western Reserve Hospital. Department of Surgery, Northeast Ohio Medical School (NEOMED), Athens, OH, USA.
                [9 ]Basic Science Research, Millennium Pain Center, Bloomington, IL, USA.
                [10 ]School of Biological Sciences, Illinois State University, Normal, IL, USA. “Department of Psychology, Illinois Wesleyan University, Bloomington, IL, USA.
                [11 ]Department of Psychology, Illinois Wesleyan University, Bloomington, IL, USA
                [12 ]Present Address: VA San Diego, 3350 La Jolla Village Dr, (MC116A), San Diego, CA 92161, USA.
                Author notes

                Authors’ contributions

                JC and IL wrote, edited and reviewed final versions of this manuscript. JC IL and SY created all figures in the manuscript. All other authors (RRe, SY, CC, MH, CH, RRa, DB, AS, DS, SN, RV) wrote, edited and or created tables within the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

                [* ]Correspondence: ilerman@ 123456ucsd.edu
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6564-7222
                Article
                VAPA1041521
                10.1186/s42234-019-0023-1
                6703564
                32232092
                68b524df-5225-4450-a49f-9770cb7bf6e6

                Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                Categories
                Article

                spinal cord stimulation,biomarker,neurophysiology,chronic pain,complex regional pain syndrome,failed back surgery syndrome,mechanisms of action,neuropathic pain,objective measures,neuroinflammation

                Comments

                Comment on this article