16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Pollination Reservoirs in Lowbush Blueberry (Ericales: Ericaceae)

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Pollinator-dependent agriculture heavily relies upon a single pollinator—the honey bee. To diversify pollination strategies, growers are turning to alternatives. Densely planted reservoirs of pollen- and nectar-rich flowers (pollination reservoirs, hereafter “PRs”) may improve pollination services provided by wild bees. Our focal agroecosystem, lowbush blueberry ( Vaccinium angustifolium Aiton), exists in a simple landscape uniquely positioned to benefit from PRs. First, we contrast bee visitation rates and use of three types of PR. We consider the effects of PRs on wild bee diversity and the composition of bumble bee pollen loads. We contrast field-level crop pollination services between PRs and controls four years postestablishment. Last, we calculate the time to pay for PR investment. Social bees preferentially used clover plantings; solitary bees preferentially used wildflower plantings. On average, bumble bee pollen loads in treatment fields contained 37% PR pollen. PRs significantly increased visitation rates to the crop in year 4, and exerted a marginally significant positive influence on fruit set. The annualized costs of PRs were covered by the fourth year using the measured increase in pollination services. Our findings provide evidence of the positive impact of PRs on crop pollination services.

          Related collections

          Most cited references80

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Environmental factors driving the effectiveness of European agri-environmental measures in mitigating pollinator loss--a meta-analysis.

          In Europe, agri-environmental schemes (AES) have been introduced in response to concerns about farmland biodiversity declines. Yet, as AES have delivered variable results, a better understanding of what determines their success or failure is urgently needed. Focusing on pollinating insects, we quantitatively reviewed how environmental factors affect the effectiveness of AES. Our results suggest that the ecological contrast in floral resources created by schemes drives the response of pollinators to AES but that this response is moderated by landscape context and farmland type, with more positive responses in croplands (vs. grasslands) located in simple (vs. cleared or complex) landscapes. These findings inform us how to promote pollinators and associated pollination services in species-poor landscapes. They do not, however, present viable strategies to mitigate loss of threatened or endangered species. This indicates that the objectives and design of AES should distinguish more clearly between biodiversity conservation and delivery of ecosystem services. © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd/CNRS.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Global growth and stability of agricultural yield decrease with pollinator dependence.

            Human welfare depends on the amount and stability of agricultural production, as determined by crop yield and cultivated area. Yield increases asymptotically with the resources provided by farmers' inputs and environmentally sensitive ecosystem services. Declining yield growth with increased inputs prompts conversion of more land to cultivation, but at the risk of eroding ecosystem services. To explore the interdependence of agricultural production and its stability on ecosystem services, we present and test a general graphical model, based on Jensen's inequality, of yield-resource relations and consider implications for land conversion. For the case of animal pollination as a resource influencing crop yield, this model predicts that incomplete and variable pollen delivery reduces yield mean and stability (inverse of variability) more for crops with greater dependence on pollinators. Data collected by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations during 1961-2008 support these predictions. Specifically, crops with greater pollinator dependence had lower mean and stability in relative yield and yield growth, despite global yield increases for most crops. Lower yield growth was compensated by increased land cultivation to enhance production of pollinator-dependent crops. Area stability also decreased with pollinator dependence, as it correlated positively with yield stability among crops. These results reveal that pollen limitation hinders yield growth of pollinator-dependent crops, decreasing temporal stability of global agricultural production, while promoting compensatory land conversion to agriculture. Although we examined crop pollination, our model applies to other ecosystem services for which the benefits to human welfare decelerate as the maximum is approached.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Local and landscape-level floral resources explain effects of wildflower strips on wild bees across four European countries

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Econ Entomol
                J. Econ. Entomol
                jee
                Journal of Economic Entomology
                Oxford University Press
                0022-0493
                1938-291X
                April 2017
                09 January 2017
                09 January 2017
                : 110
                : 2
                : 333-346
                Affiliations
                [1 ]School of Biology and Ecology, University of Maine, 5722 Deering Hall, Orono, ME 04469 ( Eric.Venturini@ 123456maine.edu ; FDrummond@ 123456maine.edu ; ADibble2@ 123456gmail.com )
                [3 ]University of Maine Cooperative Extension, 495 College Ave., Orono, ME 04469 ( Lois.Stack@ 123456maine.edu )
                [4 ]School of Economics, University of Maine, 206 Winslow Hall, Orono, ME 04469 ( Aaron_Hoshide@ 123456umit.maine.edu )
                [5 ]School of Food and Agriculture, University of Maine, 5722 Deering Hall, Orono, ME 04469
                Author notes
                [2 ]Corresponding author, e-mail: Eric.Venturini@ 123456maine.edu

                Subject Editor: Robert Danka

                Article
                tow285
                10.1093/jee/tow285
                5387985
                28069631
                68f2d7fe-566f-44b2-aea2-70e3692aaea1
                © The Authors 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com

                History
                : 22 July 2016
                Page count
                Pages: 14
                Categories
                Apiculture & Social Insects

                agroecosystem,crop pollination,pollination reservoir,wildflower planting,wild bee

                Comments

                Comment on this article