23
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Estimated number of prevalent cases of metastatic bone disease in the US adult population

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The prevalence of metastatic bone disease in the US population is not well understood. We sought to estimate the current number of US adults with metastatic bone disease using two large administrative data sets.

          Methods

          Prevalence was estimated from a commercially insured cohort (ages 18–64 years, MarketScan database) and from a fee-for-service Medicare cohort (ages ≥65 years, Medicare 5% database) with coverage on December 31, 2008, representing approximately two-thirds of the US population in each age group. We searched for claims-based evidence of metastatic bone disease from January 1, 2004, using a combination of relevant diagnosis and treatment codes. The number of cases in the US adult population was extrapolated from age- and sex-specific prevalence estimated in these cohorts. Results are presented for all cancers combined and separately for primary breast, prostate, and lung cancer.

          Results

          In the commercially insured cohort (mean age = 42.3 years [SD = 13.1]), we identified 9505 patients (0.052%) with metastatic bone disease. Breast cancer was the most common primary tumor type (n = 4041). In the Medicare cohort (mean age = 75.6 years [SD = 7.8]), we identified 6427 (0.495%) patients with metastatic bone disease. Breast (n = 1798) and prostate (n = 1862) cancers were the most common primary tumor types. We estimate that 279,679 (95% confidence interval: 274,579–284,780) US adults alive on December 31, 2008, had evidence of metastatic bone disease in the previous 5 years. Breast, prostate, and lung cancers accounted for 68% of these cases.

          Conclusion

          Our findings suggest that approximately 280,000 US adults were living with metastatic bone disease on December 31, 2008. This likely underestimates the true frequency; not all cases of metastatic bone disease are diagnosed, and some diagnosed cases might lack documentation in claims data.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Clin Epidemiol
          Clin Epidemiol
          Clinical Epidemiology
          Clinical Epidemiology
          Dove Medical Press
          1179-1349
          2012
          10 April 2012
          : 4
          : 87-93
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Chronic Disease Research Group, Minneapolis Medical Research Foundation, Minneapolis, MN, USA
          [2 ]Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
          [3 ]Center for Observational Research, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
          [4 ]Global Development, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
          Author notes
          Correspondence: Thomas J Arneson, Chronic Disease Research Group, Minneapolis Medical Research Foundation, 914 South 8th Street, Suite S-406, Minneapolis, MN 55404, USA, Tel +1 612 347 5355, Fax +1 612 347 5980, Email tarneson@ 123456cdrg.org
          Article
          clep-4-087
          10.2147/CLEP.S28339
          3345874
          22570568
          696e10fb-de3b-43a0-8164-c29fda1c3f81
          © 2012 Li et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd.

          This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.

          History
          Categories
          Original Research

          Public health
          metastasis,epidemiology,prevalence,bone neoplasms
          Public health
          metastasis, epidemiology, prevalence, bone neoplasms

          Comments

          Comment on this article