Blog
About

1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Immunosuppressive Treatment of Idiopathic Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis: A Five-Year Follow-Up Study

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background/Aims: Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is a common type of glomerular disease that can lead to chronic renal failure. Various therapeutic regimens have been used in nephrotic FSGS patients. The effect of treatment with prednisolone alone or its combination with azathioprine and cyclosporin and parameters related to a poor outcome are studied. Methods: Fifty-one patients with idiopathic FSGS and a follow-up period of 5 years were included. Twenty-five were treated with prednisolone alone (1 mg/kg BW/day) or combination of prednisolone (0.5 mg/kg BW/day) with azathioprine (2 mg/kg BW/day) or cyclosporine (3 mg/kg BW/day) in gradually reduced doses whereas 26 patients received no immunosuppressive drugs. Lower prednisolone dose regimens were used as initial treatment in obese, borderline diabetics or patients with bone disease. The clinical course was estimated using the end-points of 50% or doubling of baseline serum creatinine and/or end-stage renal failure. The contribution of clinical and histological parameters in the clinical outcome was estimated by univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: Increase of baseline serum creatinine by 50% during the follow-up period was observed in 2 treated and 9 untreated patients (8% vs. 35%, p = 0.03) whereas doubling of serum creatinine in 2 and 5 patients respectively (8% vs. 19%, p = NS). End-stage renal failure developed in 4 of 51 patients (8%), 2 treated and 2 untreated (p = NS). Parameters related to a poor outcome were baseline serum creatinine and severity of glomerulosclerosis (multivariate analysis OR = 1.08, p = 0.01). Most of patients (68%) who reached end-points had persistent nephrotic syndrome during the follow-up. Remission of nephrotic syndrome was observed more frequently among treated (75 vs. 30.7%, p = 0.05). Prednisolone alone was followed by remission of nephrotic syndrome in 62.5% whereas combination of lower prednisolone dose with azathioprine and cyclosporin in 80 and 85.7% of patients. No serious side-effects were observed. Conclusion: This and previous studies suggest that steroid and/or immunosuppressive therapy have a role in amelioration of the clinical course and remission of nephrotic syndrome in patients with FSGS A combination of low predisolone dose with cyclosporine could be used as initial treatment in patients with higher risk for side-effects from the usual prednisolone dose.

          Related collections

          Most cited references 16

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in nephrotic adults: presentation, prognosis, and response to therapy of the histologic variants.

          The histopathologic diagnosis of primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) has come to include a number of histologic lesions (variants), but the prognostic significance of these discrete lesions is controversial because published information regarding the presentation, course, and response to treatment is limited. A retrospective analysis was conducted of 87 nephrotic adult patients with biopsy-proven primary FSGS. Patients were categorized on the basis of histologic criteria into those with a classic scar (36 patients), the cellular or collapsing lesion (40 patients), or the tip lesion (11 patients) of FSGS to evaluate differences in presentation, response to therapy, and clinical outcomes. The clinical features at biopsy were similar among the three groups with the exception that patients with the tip lesion were older and patients with the collapsing lesion had more severe proteinuria. Over the course of follow-up, 63% of patients treated attained remission and the response to steroid therapy was similar among the groups (classic scar 53% versus collapsing lesion 64% versus tip lesion 78%; P = 0.45). The overall renal survival was significantly better for patients who entered remission compared with patients who did not enter remission (92% versus 33% at 10 yr; P < 0.0001). The renal survival at 10 yr for patients who entered remission was similar among the three groups (classic scar 100% versus tip lesion 100% versus collapsing lesion 80%; P = 0.61). In patients who did not enter remission, the renal survival at 10 yr was significantly worse for patients with collapsing lesion and tip lesion (classic scar 49% versus tip lesion 25% versus collapsing lesion 21%; P = 0.002). In conclusion, the prognosis for nephrotic FSGS patients who enter remission is excellent regardless of the histologic lesion. Because the remission rate after treatment is similar among patients with the histologic variants, response to therapy cannot be predicted on the basis of histology alone. Thus, nephrotic patients with primary FSGS should receive a trial of therapy irrespective of the histologic lesion when not contraindicated.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A randomized trial of cyclosporine in patients with steroid-resistant focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. North America Nephrotic Syndrome Study Group.

            A randomized trial of cyclosporine in patients with steroid-resistant focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. A clinical trial of cyclosporine in patients with steroid-resistant focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) was conducted. Despite the fact that it is the most common primary glomerulonephritis to progress to renal failure, treatment trials have been very limited. We conducted a randomized controlled trial in 49 cases of steroid-resistant FSGS comparing 26 weeks of cyclosporine treatment plus low-dose prednisone to placebo plus prednisone. All patients were followed for an average of 200 weeks, and the short- and long-term effects on renal function were assessed. Seventy percent of the treatment group versus 4% of the placebo group (P < 0. 001) had a partial or complete remission of their proteinuria by 26 weeks. Relapse occurred in 40% of the remitters by 52 weeks and 60% by week 78, but the remainder stayed in remission to the end of the observation period. Renal function was better preserved in the cyclosporine group. There was a decrease of 50% in baseline creatinine clearance in 25% of the treated group compared with 52% of controls (P < 0.05). This was a reduction in risk of 70% (95% CI, 9 to 93) independent of other baseline demographic and laboratory variables. These results suggest that cyclosporine is an effective therapeutic agent in the treatment of steroid-resistant cases of FSGS. Although a high relapse rate does occur, a long-term decrease in proteinuria and preservation of filtration function were observed in a significant proportion of treated patients.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Focal segmental glomerular sclerosis in adults: presentation, course, and response to treatment.

              The authors performed a retrospective clinicopathologic study in 81 patients with primary focal segmental glomerular sclerosis (FSGS) to determine whether they could identify clinical or histologic features at presentation that could be predictive of outcome and response to therapy. Males constituted 58% of patients, and 53% were black. At biopsy the patients were 40 +/- 17 years old; 74% were nephrotic, and renal insufficiency was present in 62%. The average time from presentation to biopsy was 16 months, and the average total follow-up was 62 months. Nephrotic patients had a significantly poorer prognosis as compared with nonnephrotic patients (5- and 10-year survivals of 76% and 57% v 92% and 92%; P < 0.05). A multivariate analysis was done on histologic and clinical features at biopsy, assessing for risk factors leading to end-stage renal disease, showing only the serum creatinine and the degree of interstitial fibrosis to have a significant correlation. Thirty nephrotic patients received prednisone, with a treatment time of 5.5 +/- 4 months and a total dose of 5.9 +/- 2.9 g per course of treatment. Fifteen of these patients (50%) achieved a remission by 3.7 +/- 2 months (10 complete remission and 5 partial remissions), with all patients responding within 9 months. Only two patients had spontaneous remissions (both partial). The 5- and 10-year survival for patients in remission were both 100% as compared with 66% and 41% (P < 0.01), respectively, for nephrotic patients not in remission. No clinical feature at presentation of biopsy was predictive of response to therapy when a multivariate analysis was performed.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                NEC
                Nephron Clin Pract
                10.1159/issn.1660-2110
                Nephron Clinical Practice
                S. Karger AG
                1660-2110
                2006
                September 2006
                21 June 2006
                : 104
                : 2
                : c75-c82
                Affiliations
                Department of Internal Medicine, Divisions of aNephrology and bCardiology, University Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece; cSheffield Kidney Institute, dDepartment of Histopathology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Northern General Campus, Sheffield, UK
                Article
                93993 Nephron Clin Pract 2006;104:c75–c82
                10.1159/000093993
                16785738
                © 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel

                Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 4, References: 22, Pages: 1
                Product
                Self URI (application/pdf): https://www.karger.com/Article/Pdf/93993
                Categories
                Original Paper

                Cardiovascular Medicine, Nephrology

                Immunosuppressive drugs, Chronic renal failure

                Comments

                Comment on this article