7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Optimizing environmental DNA sampling effort for fish inventories in tropical streams and rivers

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is a promising tool to estimate aquatic biodiversity. It is based on the capture of DNA from a water sample. The sampled water volume, a crucial aspect for efficient species detection, has been empirically variable (ranging from few centiliters to tens of liters). This results in a high variability of sampling effort across studies, making comparisons difficult and raising uncertainties about the completeness of eDNA inventories. Our aim was to determine the sampling effort (filtered water volume) needed to get optimal inventories of fish assemblages in species-rich tropical streams and rivers using eDNA. Ten DNA replicates were collected in six Guianese sites (3 streams and 3 rivers), resulting in sampling efforts ranging from 17 to 340 liters of water. We show that sampling 34 liters of water detected more than 64% of the expected fish fauna and permitted to distinguish the fauna between sites and between ecosystem types (stream versus rivers). Above 68 liters, the number of detected species per site increased slightly, with a detection rate higher than 71%. Increasing sampling effort up to 340 liters provided little additional information, testifying that filtering 34 to 68 liters is sufficient to inventory most of the fauna in highly diverse tropical aquatic ecosystems.

          Related collections

          Most cited references31

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            obitools: a unix-inspired software package for DNA metabarcoding.

            DNA metabarcoding offers new perspectives in biodiversity research. This recently developed approach to ecosystem study relies heavily on the use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) and thus calls upon the ability to deal with huge sequence data sets. The obitools package satisfies this requirement thanks to a set of programs specifically designed for analysing NGS data in a DNA metabarcoding context. Their capacity to filter and edit sequences while taking into account taxonomic annotation helps to set up tailor-made analysis pipelines for a broad range of DNA metabarcoding applications, including biodiversity surveys or diet analyses. The obitools package is distributed as an open source software available on the following website: http://metabarcoding.org/obitools. A Galaxy wrapper is available on the GenOuest core facility toolshed: http://toolshed.genouest.org.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Next-generation monitoring of aquatic biodiversity using environmental DNA metabarcoding.

              Global biodiversity in freshwater and the oceans is declining at high rates. Reliable tools for assessing and monitoring aquatic biodiversity, especially for rare and secretive species, are important for efficient and timely management. Recent advances in DNA sequencing have provided a new tool for species detection from DNA present in the environment. In this study, we tested whether an environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding approach, using water samples, can be used for addressing significant questions in ecology and conservation. Two key aquatic vertebrate groups were targeted: amphibians and bony fish. The reliability of this method was cautiously validated in silico, in vitro and in situ. When compared with traditional surveys or historical data, eDNA metabarcoding showed a much better detection probability overall. For amphibians, the detection probability with eDNA metabarcoding was 0.97 (CI = 0.90-0.99) vs. 0.58 (CI = 0.50-0.63) for traditional surveys. For fish, in 89% of the studied sites, the number of taxa detected using the eDNA metabarcoding approach was higher or identical to the number detected using traditional methods. We argue that the proposed DNA-based approach has the potential to become the next-generation tool for ecological studies and standardized biodiversity monitoring in a wide range of aquatic ecosystems.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                isa_cantera@hotmail.com
                Journal
                Sci Rep
                Sci Rep
                Scientific Reports
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2045-2322
                28 February 2019
                28 February 2019
                2019
                : 9
                : 3085
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Laboratoire Évolution & Diversité Biologique (EDB UMR5174), Université Paul Sabatier - Toulouse 3, CNRS, IRD, UPS, 118 route de Narbonne, 31062 Toulouse Cedex, France
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1792 1930, GRID grid.48142.3b, Irstea, UR RECOVER, Equipe FRESHCO, ; 3275 Route de Cézanne, CS 40061, 13182 Aix en Provence, France
                [3 ]SPYGEN, 17 rue du Lac Saint-André Savoie Technolac - BP 274, Le Bourget-du-Lac, 73375 France
                [4 ]Écologie des Forêts de Guyane (UMR EcoFoG), Campus Agronomique, Kourou, French Guiana
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2112 9282, GRID grid.4444.0, Laboratoire d’Ecologie Alpine (LECA UMR5553), , CNRS, Université Grenoble Alpes, ; 38041 Grenoble, France
                [6 ]HYDRECO, Laboratoire Environnement de Petit Saut, B.P 823, F-97388 Kourou Cedex, French Guiana
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3161-1878
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5829-5479
                Article
                39399
                10.1038/s41598-019-39399-5
                6395586
                30816174
                69814b37-c050-4fde-bce2-28eadb8f7029
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 14 September 2018
                : 4 January 2019
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article