70
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Female teachers’ math anxiety affects girls’ math achievement

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          People’s fear and anxiety about doing math—over and above actual math ability—can be an impediment to their math achievement. We show that when the math-anxious individuals are female elementary school teachers, their math anxiety carries negative consequences for the math achievement of their female students. Early elementary school teachers in the United States are almost exclusively female (>90%), and we provide evidence that these female teachers’ anxieties relate to girls’ math achievement via girls’ beliefs about who is good at math. First- and second-grade female teachers completed measures of math anxiety. The math achievement of the students in these teachers’ classrooms was also assessed. There was no relation between a teacher’s math anxiety and her students’ math achievement at the beginning of the school year. By the school year’s end, however, the more anxious teachers were about math, the more likely girls (but not boys) were to endorse the commonly held stereotype that “boys are good at math, and girls are good at reading” and the lower these girls’ math achievement. Indeed, by the end of the school year, girls who endorsed this stereotype had significantly worse math achievement than girls who did not and than boys overall. In early elementary school, where the teachers are almost all female, teachers’ math anxiety carries consequences for girls’ math achievement by influencing girls’ beliefs about who is good at math.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Nature, Effects, and Relief of Mathematics Anxiety

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Age and gender differences in children's self- and task perceptions during elementary school.

            We examined the development of children's self- and task perceptions during the elementary school years. 865 first-, second,- and fourth-grade children (ages 7-10) completed questionnaires assessing their perceptions of competence in, and valuing of, activities in several activity domains (math, reading, sports, and instrumental music). Factor analyses showed that even the first graders had differentiated self-beliefs for the various activities. These analyses also indicated that children's competence beliefs and subjective task values formed distinct factors. Analyses assessing age and gender differences in children's beliefs showed that for all the activities except sports, younger children's (particularly the first graders) perceptions of competence and subjective task values were more positive than the beliefs of the older children. Boys had more positive competence beliefs and values than did girls for sport activities, and more positive competence beliefs for mathematics. Girls had more positive competence beliefs and values than did boys for reading and music activities.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Diversity. Gender similarities characterize math performance.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
                Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A
                pnas
                pnas
                PNAS
                Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
                National Academy of Sciences
                0027-8424
                1091-6490
                25 January 2010
                2 February 2010
                25 January 2010
                : 107
                : 5
                : 1860-1863
                Affiliations
                [1]Department of Psychology and Committee on Education, University of Chicago, IL 60607
                Author notes
                1To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Department of Psychology, University of Chicago, 5848 South University Avenue, Chicago, IL 60607. E-mail: beilock@ 123456uchicago.edu .

                Edited * by Edward E. Smith, Columbia University, New York, NY, and approved December 17, 2009 (received for review September 23, 2009)

                Author contributions: S.L.B., E.A.G., G.R., and S.C.L. designed research; E.A.G. and G.R. performed research; S.L.B. and E.A.G. analyzed data; and S.L.B., E.A.G., G.R., and S.C.L. wrote the paper.

                *This Direct Submission article had a prearranged editor.

                Indeed, a 2000 survey of kindergarten through second-grade teachers in the United States revealed that while almost all teachers (93%) had taken college courses in mathematics education, far fewer had completed more advanced math courses such as probability and statistics (33%), geometry for elementary/middle school teachers (19%), and calculus (13%) (1).

                Controlling for teachers’ math knowledge did not alter these results (see SI Methods for more detail).

                §One might notice that this relation approached significance. Because it is unlikely that students are deliberately assigned to classrooms based on the teacher’s math anxiety, this relation likely occurred by chance. Nonetheless, to ensure that it was not influencing our end-of-year findings, we ran an alternate version of our mediation model controlling for girls’ beginning-of-year gender ability beliefs. Girls’ end-of-year beliefs significantly continued to mediate (or account for) the relation between teachers’ math anxiety and girls’ end-of-year math achievement (95% CI: −2.84 to −0.061; P < 0.05). In contrast, girls’ beginning-of-year gender ability beliefs were not a significant predictor (β = −0.02, t = −0.17, P = 0.862), suggesting that this factor was not driving our end-of-year mediation effects.

                When controlling for beginning-of-year gender ability beliefs, the correlation between teachers’ math anxiety and girls’ end-of-year gender ability beliefs remained significant ( r = 0.31, P = 0.012).

                When teachers’ math anxiety was in the equation, their math knowledge was controlled, and when girls’ end-of-year math achievement was in the equation, their beginning-of-year math achievement was controlled.

                Article
                200910967
                10.1073/pnas.0910967107
                2836676
                20133834
                69b0d4d3-c6a6-4622-aacd-38a8e3cd9c00

                Freely available online through the PNAS open access option.

                History
                Categories
                Social Sciences
                Psychological and Cognitive Sciences

                education,mathematics,gender,stereotype,modeling
                education, mathematics, gender, stereotype, modeling

                Comments

                Comment on this article