22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Iodine-131 metaiodobenzylguanidine for the locating of suspected pheochromocytoma: experience in 400 cases.

      Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine
      3-Iodobenzylguanidine, Adrenal Gland Neoplasms, genetics, radionuclide imaging, False Negative Reactions, False Positive Reactions, Humans, Iodine Radioisotopes, diagnostic use, Iodobenzenes, Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia, Pheochromocytoma

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The efficacy of the newly developed pheochromocytoma-seeking radiopharmaceutical, [131I]MIBG, was examined in the first 400 patients (441 studies) investigated for suspected pheochromocytoma at our institution. The results of [131I]MIBG scintigraphy were classified as true positive, false positive, true negative, and false negative. Using this classification the sensitivity was found to be 78.4% in primary, sporadic pheochromocytoma, 92.4% in malignant pheochromocytoma, and 94.3% in familial pheochromocytoma giving an overall sensitivity of 87.4%. The specificity was 98.9% in primary, sporadic pheochromocytoma, 100% in malignant pheochromocytoma, and 100% in familial pheochromocytoma. The overall specificity was 98.9%. Iodine-131 MIBG scintigraphy was thus found to be a safe, noninvasive, and efficacious technique for the location of pheochromocytomas, especially for those arising from nonadrenal sites, recurring postoperatively, and exhibiting malignant metastatic disease. We find that, where available, [131I]MIBG scintigraphy is the study of choice to initiate the location of suspected pheochromocytoma.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article