25
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The safety and effectiveness of the current treatment regimen with or without roflumilast in advanced COPD patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a chronic respiratory disease, which reduces the lung function and causes respiratory symptoms over time, and it is primarily associated with shortness of breath, cough and sputum production. Roflumilast, which is a long-acting selective inhibitor, reduces the anti-inflammatory effect of the main symptoms of COPD. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical effectiveness of adding roflumilast to the current treatment regimen of patients with severe COPD.

          Methods: To retrieve the marker studies, medical databases were searched up to February 2014. We included studies, which compared the clinical effectiveness and safety of roflumilast as concomitant to Long-acting ß2-agonist/Long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LABA/LAMA) regimen, in adult patients with severe COPD. The number of exacerbations, changes in the lung function FEV1, FEV1/FVC and quality of life were the major predefined outcomes. Meta-analysis of outcomes was performed by the RevMan software, with I 2> 50%, representing considerable heterogeneity.

          Results: Seven randomized controlled trials and two systematic reviews were included. In terms of safety, participants were likely to experience more side effects from roflumilast compared to placebo, particularly gastrointestinal effects (diarrhea, nausea, vomiting), headache and weight loss. There was no significant difference in the risk of cardiac complications or flu-like symptoms or upper respiratory tract infection in the two groups. In terms of effectiveness, only a small improvement was observed in SGRQ (St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire) index. Roflumilast reduced moderate to severe attacks, and caused significant improvements in the lung function regardless of the severity of the disease and the concurrent use of other standard COPD therapies.

          Conclusion: Roflumilast anti-inflammatory therapy reduces the chronic bronchitis symptoms in patients with moderate to severe COPD, and it can be safely used with other drugs simultaneously.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Standards for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with COPD: a summary of the ATS/ERS position paper.

          W MacNee, , B Celli (2004)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: molecular and cellular mechanisms.

            Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is a leading cause of death and disability, but has only recently been extensively explored from a cellular and molecular perspective. There is a chronic inflammation that leads to fixed narrowing of small airways and alveolar wall destruction (emphysema). This is characterised by increased numbers of alveolar macrophages, neutrophils and cytotoxic T-lymphocytes, and the release of multiple inflammatory mediators (lipids, chemokines, cytokines, growth factors). A high level of oxidative stress may amplify this inflammation. There is also increased elastolysis and evidence for involvement of several elastolytic enzymes, including serine proteases, cathepsins and matrix metalloproteinases. The inflammation and proteolysis in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is an amplification of the normal inflammatory response to cigarette smoke. This inflammation, in marked contrast to asthma, appears to be resistant to corticosteroids, prompting a search for novel anti-inflammatory therapies that may prevent the relentless progression of the disease.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Effect of tiotropium on outcomes in patients with moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (UPLIFT): a prespecified subgroup analysis of a randomised controlled trial.

              The beneficial effects of pharmacotherapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are well established. However, there are few data for treatment in the early stages of the disease. We examined the effect of tiotropium on outcomes in a large subgroup of patients with moderate COPD. The Understanding Potential Long-Term Impacts on Function with Tiotropium (UPLIFT) study was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial undertaken in 487 centres in 37 countries. 5993 patients aged 40 years or more with COPD were randomly assigned to receive 4 years of treatment with either once daily tiotropium (18 microg; n=2987) or matching placebo (n=3006), delivered by an inhalation device. Randomisation was by computer-generated blocks of four, with stratification according to study site. In a prespecified subgroup analysis, we investigated the effects of tiotropium in patients with Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) stage II disease. Primary endpoints were the yearly rates of decline in prebronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) and in postbronchodilator FEV(1), beginning on day 30 until completion of double-blind treatment. The analysis included all patients who had at least three measurements of pulmonary function. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00144339. 2739 participants (mean age 64 years [SD 9]) had GOLD stage II disease at randomisation (tiotropium, n=1384; control, n=1355), with a mean postbronchodilator FEV(1) of 1.63 L (SD 0.37; 59% of predicted value). 1218 patients in the tiotropium group and 1157 in the control group had three or more measurements of postbronchodilator pulmonary function after day 30 and were included in the analysis. The rate of decline of mean postbronchodilator FEV(1) was lower in the tiotropium group than in the control group (43 mL per year [SE 2] vs 49 mL per year [SE 2], p=0.024). For prebronchodilator pulmonary function, 1221 patients in the tiotropium group and 1158 in the control group had three or more measurements and were included in the analysis. The rate of decline of mean prebronchodilator FEV(1) did not differ between groups (35 mL per year [SE 2] vs 37 mL per year [SE 2]; p=0.38). Health status, measured with the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire, was better at all timepoints in the tiotropium group than in the control group (p
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Med J Islam Repub Iran
                Med J Islam Repub Iran
                MJIRI
                Med J Islam Repub Iran
                Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran
                Iran University of Medical Sciences
                1016-1430
                2251-6840
                2016
                20 February 2016
                : 30
                : 332
                Affiliations
                1 MSc Student, HTA, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. ja.saeideh@ 123456gmail.com
                2 Assistant Professor, National Institute of Health Research, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. arolyaee@ 123456yahoo.com
                3 PhD, Office for Clinical Trials, Food and Drug Organization, Tehran, Iran. hosseini.reza7@ 123456gmail.com
                4 Associate Professor, Department of Health Management and Economics, and Knowledge Utilization Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. akbarisari@ 123456tums.ac.ir
                5 Associate Professor, Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. shafirus@ 123456yahoo.com
                6 PhD Student in Health Economics, Department of Health Economics, School of Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. mojtabanouhi@ 123456gmail.com
                7 Young Researchers and Elites Club, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran. mobinreza@ 123456yahoo.com
                Author notes
                (Corresponding author) Assistant Professor, National Institute of Health Research, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. arolyaee@ 123456yahoo.com
                Article
                4898851
                27390702
                69decfc2-6efe-4ca6-ac9c-6a687a781f6f
                © 2016 Iran University of Medical Sciences

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0), which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.

                History
                : 08 September 2015
                : 09 November 2015
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 6, References: 35, Pages: 22
                Categories
                Original Article

                roflumilast,copd,safety,effectiveness
                roflumilast, copd, safety, effectiveness

                Comments

                Comment on this article