2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Prevalence of catastrophic health expenditure and its associated factors, due to out-of-pocket health care expenses among households with and without chronic illness in Bangalore, India: a longitudinal study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          Background

          India, one of the economic powerhouses of the world, is lacking in health development.Moreover, it is facing ‘Triple burden of disease’. Indians have one of highest proportion of out-of-pocket (OOP) health expenses. Salient reasons are poor quality public health care, costly private care and lack of health insurance. This has led to catastrophic health expenditure (CHE). Another contributor to this CHE is the chronic illness, which require long-term follow-up. It is estimated that catastrophic health expenditure impoverishes 3.3% of Indians every year. This study was undertaken with an aim to estimate the prevalence of catastrophic health expenditure and its associated factors.

          Methods

          A longitudinal study with one-year follow-up period was conducted among 350 households of an urban area in Bangalore city. Simple random sampling method was used to select the study sample. Data collection done using pre-tested, semi-structured questionnaire by interview method.

          Results

          Chronic illness mean health expenditure was 1155.67 INR (56.09% of the direct cost was spent on drugs). In acute illness, mean health expenditure was 567.45 INR (59.54% of the direct cost was spent on drugs). Fourty eight (14.86%) of the households experienced CHE in the one year Statistically significant association was found between socio-economic status and catastrophic health expenditure. Eighty-five 42% of the households who experienced CHE had a member with chronic illness in it.

          Conclusion

          Reducing the financial burden of high health care expenses is possible by improving the government health care system, free quality regular supply of medications to chronic disease patients and to improve the beneficiaries under insurance schemes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references10

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Out-of-pocket healthcare payments on chronic conditions impoverish urban poor in Bangalore, India

          Background The burden of chronic conditions is on the rise in India, necessitating long-term support from healthcare services. Healthcare, in India, is primarily financed through out-of-pocket payments by households. Considering scarce evidence available from India, our study investigates whether and how out-of-pocket payments for outpatient care affect individuals with chronic conditions. Methods A large census covering 9299 households was conducted in Bangalore, India. Of these, 3202 households that reported presence of chronic condition were further analysed. Data was collected using a structured household-level questionnaire. Out-of-pocket payments, catastrophic healthcare expenditure, and the resultant impoverishment were measured using a standard technique. Results The response rate for the census was 98.5%. Overall, 69.6% (95%CI=68.0-71.2) of households made out-of-pocket payments for outpatient care spending a median of 3.2% (95%CI=3.0-3.4) of their total income. Overall, 16% (95%CI=14.8-17.3) of households suffered financial catastrophe by spending more than 10% of household income on outpatient care. Occurrence and intensity of financial catastrophe were inequitably high among poor. Low household income, use of referral hospitals as place for consultation, and small household size were associated with a greater likelihood of incurring financial catastrophe. The out-of-pocket spending on chronic conditions doubled the number of people living below the poverty line in one month, with further deepening of their poverty. In order to cope, households borrowed money (4.2% instances), and sold or mortgaged their assets (0.4% instances). Conclusions This study provides evidence from India that the out-of-pocket payment for chronic conditions, even for outpatient care, pushes people into poverty. Our findings suggest that improving availability of affordable medications and diagnostics for chronic conditions, as well as strengthening the gate keeping function of the primary care services are important measures to enhance financial protection for urban poor. Our findings call for inclusion of outpatient care for chronic conditions in existing government-initiated health insurance schemes.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Maternal and neonatal health expenditure in mumbai slums (India): A cross sectional study

            Background The cost of maternity care can be a barrier to access that may increase maternal and neonatal mortality risk. We analyzed spending on maternity care in urban slum communities in Mumbai to better understand the equity of spending and the impact of spending on household poverty. Methods We used expenditure data for maternal and neonatal care, collected during post-partum interviews. Interviews were conducted in 2005-2006, with a sample of 1200 slum residents in Mumbai (India). We analysed expenditure by socio-economic status (SES), calculating a Kakwani Index for a range of spending categories. We also calculated catastrophic health spending both with and without adjustment for coping strategies. This identified the level of catastrophic payments incurred by a household and the prevalence of catastrophic payments in this population. The analysis also gave an understanding of the protection from medical poverty afforded by coping strategies (for example saving and borrowing). Results A high proportion of respondents spent catastrophically on care. Lower SES was associated with a higher proportion of informal payments. Indirect health expenditure was found to be (weakly) regressive as the poorest were more likely to use wage income to meet health expenses, while the less poor were more likely to use savings. Overall, the incidence of catastrophic maternity expenditure was 41%, or 15% when controlling for coping strategies. We found no significant difference in the incidence of catastrophic spending across wealth quintiles, nor could we conclude that total expenditure is regressive. Conclusions High expenditure as a proportion of household resources should alert policymakers to the burden of maternal spending in this context. Differences in informal payments, significantly regressive indirect spending and the use of savings versus wages to finance spending, all highlight the heavier burden borne by the most poor. If a policy objective is to increase institutional deliveries without forcing households deeper into poverty, these inequities will need to be addressed. Reducing out-of-pocket payments and better regulating informal payments should have direct benefits for the most poor. Alternatively, targeted schemes aimed at assisting the most poor in coping with maternal spending (including indirect spending) could reduce the household impact of high costs.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Indian community health insurance schemes provide partial protection against catastrophic health expenditure

              Background More than 72% of health expenditure in India is financed by individual households at the time of illness through out-of-pocket payments. This is a highly regressive way of financing health care and sometimes leads to impoverishment. Health insurance is recommended as a measure to protect households from such catastrophic health expenditure (CHE). We studied two Indian community health insurance (CHI) schemes, ACCORD and SEWA, to determine whether insured households are protected from CHE. Methods ACCORD provides health insurance cover for the indigenous population, living in Gudalur, Tamil Nadu. SEWA provides insurance cover for self employed women in the state of Gujarat. Both cover hospitalisation expenses, but only upto a maximum limit of US$23 and US$45, respectively. We reviewed the insurance claims registers in both schemes and identified patients who were hospitalised during the period 01/04/2003 to 31/03/2004. Details of their diagnoses, places and costs of treatment and self-reported annual incomes were obtained. There is no single definition of CHE and none of these have been validated. For this research, we used the following definition; "annual hospital expenditure greater than 10% of annual income," to identify those who experienced CHE. Results There were a total of 683 and 3152 hospital admissions at ACCORD and SEWA, respectively. In the absence of the CHI scheme, all of the patients at ACCORD and SEWA would have had to pay OOP for their hospitalisation. With the CHI scheme, 67% and 34% of patients did not have to make any out-of-pocket (OOP) payment for their hospital expenses at ACCORD and SEWA, respectively. Both CHI schemes halved the number of households that would have experienced CHE by covering hospital costs. However, despite this, 4% and 23% of households with admissions still experienced CHE at ACCORD and SEWA, respectively. This was related to the following conditions: low annual income, benefit packages with low maximum limits, exclusion of some conditions from the benefit package, and use of the private sector for admissions. Conclusion CHI appears to be effective at halving the incidence of CHE among hospitalised patients. This protection could be further enhanced by improving the design of the CHI schemes, especially by increasing the upper limits of benefit packages, minimising exclusions and controlling costs.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Prev Med Hyg
                J Prev Med Hyg
                JPMH
                Journal of Preventive Medicine and Hygiene
                Pacini Editore Srl
                1121-2233
                2421-4248
                02 April 2020
                March 2020
                : 61
                : 1
                : E92-E97
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Community Medicine, Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital , Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
                [2 ] Department of Community Medicine, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute , Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
                [3 ] Department of Pharmacology, Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital , Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
                Author notes
                Correspondence: N.B. Swetha, Department of Community Medicine, Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital, No.36, Narmadha street, Balaji Nagar, Irumbuliyur, Tambaram East Chennai-600059, Tamil Nadu, India - Tel. 8951238983 - E-mail: swethanb@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2020.61.1.1191
                7225654
                32490274
                69e3af2b-bfb5-444e-a1bc-68bd29f4e05e
                ©2020 Pacini Editore SRL, Pisa, Italy

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the CC-BY-NC-ND (Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International) license. The article can be used by giving appropriate credit and mentioning the license, but only for non-commercial purposes and only in the original version. For further information: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.en

                History
                : 07 February 2019
                : 04 December 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 4, Equations: 0, References: 15, Pages: 6
                Categories
                Original Article

                government health care,financial burden,direct costs

                Comments

                Comment on this article