9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      [Global health 2035: a world converging within a generation].

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Prompted by the 20th anniversary of the 1993 World Development Report, a Lancet Commission revisited the case for investment in health and developed a new investment framework to achieve dramatic health gains by 2035. The Commission's report has four key messages, each accompanied by opportunities for action by national governments of low-income and middle-income countries and by the international community. First, there is an enormous economic payoff from investing in health. The impressive returns make a strong case for both increased domestic financing of health and for allocating a higher proportion of official development assistance to development of health. Second, modeling by the Commission found that a "grand convergence" in health is achievable by 2035-that is, a reduction in infectious, maternal, and child mortality down to universally low levels. Convergence would require aggressive scale up of existing and new health tools, and it could mostly be financed from the expected economic growth of low- and middle-income countries. The international community can best support convergence by funding the development and delivery of new health technologies and by curbing antibiotic resistance. Third, fiscal policies -such as taxation of tobacco and alcohol- are a powerful and underused lever that governments can use to curb non-communicable diseases and injuries while also raising revenue for health. International action on NCDs and injuries should focus on providing technical assistance on fiscal policies, regional cooperation on tobacco, and funding policy and implementation research on scaling-up of interventions to tackle these conditions. Fourth, progressive universalism, a pathway to universal health coverage (UHC) that includes the poor from the outset, is an efficient way to achieve health and financial risk protection. For national governments, progressive universalism would yield high health gains per dollar spent and poor people would gain the most in terms of health and financial protection. The international community can best support countries to implement progressive UHC by financing policy and implementation research, such as on the mechanics of designing and implementing evolution of the benefits package as the resource envelope for public finance grows.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Salud Publica Mex
          Salud publica de Mexico
          1606-7916
          0036-3634
          November 7 2015
          : 57
          : 5
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, Estados Unidos de América.
          [2 ] Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, Estados Unidos de América.
          [3 ] University of the West Indies, Kingston, Jamaica.
          [4 ] Department of Economics, Center for Health Policy, Stanford University, Stanford, California, Estados Unidos de América.
          [5 ] Executive Office, GAVI Alliance, Geneva, Switzerland.
          [6 ] Ministry of Health, Kigali, Rwanda.
          [7 ] Family, Women's, and Children's Health, World Health Organization, Ginebra, Suiza.
          [8 ] World Health Organization, Ginebra, Suiza.
          [9 ] Harvard School of Public Health, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, Estados Unidos de América.
          [10 ] Development Policy and Finance, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, Estados Unidos de América.
          [11 ] Health Science Center, Peking University, Beijing, China.
          [12 ] Fiscal Affairs Department, International Monetary Fund (IMF), Washington, Distrito de Columbia, Estados Unidos de América.
          [13 ] The Lancet, London, UK.
          [14 ] Department of Health Policy and Management, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, Nueva York, Estados Unidos de América.
          [15 ] Department of Molecular Biology, Woodrow Wilson School, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, Estados Unidos de América.
          [16 ] Bank of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana.
          [17 ] Chief Economist's Office.
          [18 ] African Development Bank Group, Tunis, Tunisia.
          [19 ] Public Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, India.
          [20 ] Results for Development Institute, Washington, DC, USA.
          [21 ] Human Development Department, African Development Bank Group.
          [22 ] Department of Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Noruega.
          Article
          S0036-36342015000500017
          26545007
          6a0ca3ef-418e-4a7e-b4ea-22fbd8214456
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article