61
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Portuguese Physical Literacy Assessment Questionnaire (PPLA-Q) for adolescents (15–18 years) from grades 10–12: development, content validation and pilot testing

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The Portuguese Physical Literacy Assessment (PPLA) is a novel tool to assess high-school students’ (grade 10–12; 15–18 years) Physical Literacy (PL) in Physical Education (PE); inspired by the four domains of the Australian Physical Literacy Framework (APLF), and the Portuguese PE syllabus. This paper describes the development, content validation, and pilot testing of the PPLA-Questionnaire (PPLA-Q), one of two instruments in the PPLA, comprised of modules to assess the psychological, social, and part of the cognitive domain of PL.

          Methods

          Development was supported by previous work, analysis of the APLF, and literature review. We iteratively gathered evidence on content validity through two rounds of qualitative and quantitative expert validation ( n = 11); three rounds of cognitive interviews with high-school students ( n = 12); and multiple instances of expert advisor input. A pilot study in two grade 10 classes ( n = 41) assessed feasibility, preliminary reliability, item difficulty and discrimination.

          Results

          Initial versions of the PPLA-Q gathered evidence in favor of adequate content validity at item level: most items had an Item-Content Validity Index ≥.78 and Cohen’s κ ≥ .76. At module-level, S-CVI/Ave and UA were .87/.60, .98/.93 and .96/.84 for the cognitive, psychological, and social modules, respectively. Through the pilot study, we found evidence for feasibility, preliminary subscale and item reliability, difficulty, and discrimination. Items were reviewed through qualitative methods until saturation. Current PPLA-Q consists of 3 modules: cognitive (knowledge test with 10 items), psychological (46 Likert-type items) and social (43 Likert-type items).

          Conclusion

          Results of this study provide evidence for content validity, feasibility within PE setting and preliminary reliability of the PPLA-Q as an instrument to assess the psychological, social, and part of the cognitive domain of PL in grade 10 to 12 adolescents. Further validation and development are needed to establish construct validity and reliability, and study PPLA-Q’s integration with the PPLA-Observation (an instrument in development to assess the remaining domains of PL) within the PPLA framework.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-021-12230-5.

          Related collections

          Most cited references94

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found
              Is Open Access

              Worldwide trends in insufficient physical activity from 2001 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 358 population-based surveys with 1·9 million participants

              Insufficient physical activity is a leading risk factor for non-communicable diseases, and has a negative effect on mental health and quality of life. We describe levels of insufficient physical activity across countries, and estimate global and regional trends.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                joaorodrigues@fmh.ulisboa.pt
                Journal
                BMC Public Health
                BMC Public Health
                BMC Public Health
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2458
                29 November 2021
                29 November 2021
                2021
                : 21
                : 2183
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.9983.b, ISNI 0000 0001 2181 4263, Centro de Estudos de Educação, Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Universidade de Lisboa, Estrada da Costa, Cruz-Quebrada-Dafundo, ; Oeiras, Portugal
                [2 ]GRID grid.9983.b, ISNI 0000 0001 2181 4263, UIDEF, Instituto de Educação, Universidade de Lisboa, Alameda da Universidade, ; Lisbon, Portugal
                Article
                12230
                10.1186/s12889-021-12230-5
                8628133
                34844566
                6a2e8739-ebfd-48e6-b74f-5020404e695c
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 24 May 2021
                : 9 November 2021
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Public health
                physical literacy,assessment,physical education,content validity,pilot testing,high-school,adolescence

                Comments

                Comment on this article