1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Concomitant Infection of Helicobacter pylori and Intestinal Parasites in Adults Attending a Referral Centre for Parasitic Infections in North Eastern Italy

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: Helicobacter pylori and intestinal parasites are estimated to infect with high burden worldwide. However, their concomitant infections are poorly determined in industrialized countries, such as Italy. In this study we aim at describing the presence of H. pylori as well as the proportion of coinfections with intestinal parasites among subjects who attended a referral center for tropical diseases in Northern Italy. Methods: This was a case-control study. Screening for H. pylori and parasites was performed on stool samples of 93 adults from different geographical origin (Africa, Asia, South-America, East-Europe and Italy). H. pylori infection was examined by CLIA and its cagA positivity was determined by rtPCR. Intestinal parasites (i.e., protozoa and helminths) were examined by microscopy and rtPCR. Results: Sixty-one out of 93 patients (66%) were positive to H. pylori and 31 (33%) were cagA+. Among H. pylori positives, 45 (74%) had a concomitant infection. The coinfection H. pyloriBlastocystis was the most frequent one, followed by H. pylori–E. coli. Multivariable logistic regression showed that positivity to H. pylori was associated with having a coinfection. Conclusion: Our data suggested that H. pylori and intestinal parasitic infections are fairly common in subjects who attended a referral center for tropical diseases in Northern Italy. The high rate of H. pylori infection, and especially the positivity to the virulent cagA+, should be taken into consideration in subjects undergoing screening for parasitic infections.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Helicobacter pylori in developing countries. World Gastroenterology Organisation Global Guideline.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Application of a circulating-cathodic-antigen (CCA) strip test and real-time PCR, in comparison with microscopy, for the detection of Schistosoma haematobium in urine samples from Ghana.

            In the detection of parasitic infection, the traditional methods based on microscopy often have low sensitivity and/or specificity compared with the newer, molecular tests. An assay based on real-time PCR and a reagent strip test for detecting circulating cathodic antigen (CCA) have both now been compared with urine filtration and microscopy, in the detection of Schistosoma haematobium infections. Urine samples, obtained from 74 'cases' in areas of Ghana with endemic S. haematobium and 79 'controls' from non-endemic areas, were each checked using the three methods. With the results of the filtration and microscopy taken as the 'gold standard', real-time PCR was found to be 100% specific and 89% sensitive whereas the CCA strips were 91% specific and 41% sensitive. With the samples found to contain > or =50 eggs/10 ml (indicating relatively intense infections), the sensitivities of the PCR and CCA were higher, at 100% and 62%, respectively. As expected, egg counts were negatively correlated with the number of amplification cycles needed, in the PCR, to give a signal that exceeded the background (r=-0.38; P<0.01). Although the real-time PCR and CCA strip tests are very different, both show promise in the detection of S. haematobium infections. The PCR has optimal specificity and high sensitivity but the specificity of the CCA strips and the sensitivity of both tools could still be improved. A more thorough re-evaluation of the sensitivity and specificity of microscopy and these newer diagnostic methods, with an estimation of the cost-effectiveness of each technique, is recommended.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori infection

              This review provides the most recent data concerning the epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori infection. Overall, the trend of declining prevalence of H. pylori infection is continuing, with major evidence available from studies in Europe. However, in some parts of the world, for example, in some countries in the Middle East, the prevalence has remained relatively stable. A number of systematic reviews and meta-analyses have been published during the past year indicating the lowest prevalence rates of the infection in Oceania (24.4%), the highest in Africa (79.1%), and the global annual recurrence rate of H. pylori (4.3%). The recurrence rates were found to be directly related to the human development index and prevalence of infection. Several studies have addressed the correlation between H. pylori infection and sociodemographic conditions, source of drinking water and dietary factors. A hypothesis on the role of insects and yeasts in transmitting H. pylori has been suggested and addressed. Helicobacter sp. have been found in flow flies in Brazil. So far there is no evidence available that H. pylori may survive and persist on the outer body of the fly.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Clin Med
                J Clin Med
                jcm
                Journal of Clinical Medicine
                MDPI
                2077-0383
                24 July 2020
                August 2020
                : 9
                : 8
                : 2366
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Infectious-Tropical Diseases and Microbiology, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, 37024 Verona, Italy; tamara.ursini@ 123456sacrocuore.it (T.U.); ronaldo.silva@ 123456sacrocuore.it (R.S.); martina.leonardi@ 123456sacrocuore.it (M.L.); andrea.angheben@ 123456sacrocuore.it (A.A.)
                [2 ]Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy; marco.ligozzi@ 123456univr.it
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: elena.pomari@ 123456sacrocuore.it ; Tel.: +39-04-5601-3111
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5182-0231
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2852-2287
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9402-7981
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4545-8034
                Article
                jcm-09-02366
                10.3390/jcm9082366
                7465117
                32722134
                6a3bbbb0-c7ab-4cdc-9841-1daaef15e58c
                © 2020 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 23 June 2020
                : 21 July 2020
                Categories
                Article

                helicobacter pylori,intestinal parasites,coinfection,italy

                Comments

                Comment on this article