83
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    13
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Effects of dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine on the splanchnic circulation in septic shock: which is best?

      Critical Care Medicine
      Aged, Cross-Over Studies, Dopamine, pharmacology, therapeutic use, Epinephrine, Female, Gastric Mucosa, drug effects, Hemodynamics, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Norepinephrine, Prospective Studies, Shock, Septic, drug therapy, Splanchnic Circulation, Statistics, Nonparametric, Vasoconstrictor Agents

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To assess the effects of different doses of dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine on the splanchnic circulation in patients with septic shock. Prospective, randomized, open-label study. A 31-bed, medicosurgical intensive care unit of a university hospital. Convenience sample of 20 patients with septic shock, separated into two groups according to whether (moderate shock group, n = 10) or not (severe shock, n = 10) dopamine alone was able maintain mean arterial pressure >65 mm Hg. Dopamine was progressively withdrawn and replaced successively by norepinephrine and then epinephrine (the order of the two agents was randomly determined) to maintain mean arterial pressure constant (moderate shock) or to increase mean arterial pressure above 65 mm Hg (severe shock). Systemic circulation (pulmonary artery catheter) and splanchnic circulation (indocyanine green dilution and hepatic vein catheter) and gastric mucosal Pco(2) (gas tonometry) were measured during dopamine (moderate shock only), norepinephrine, and epinephrine administration (both groups). Data were analyzed with nonparametric tests and are presented as median [percentiles 25-75]. In moderate shock, cardiac index was similar to dopamine and norepinephrine (3.1 [2.7-3.8] vs. 2.9 [2.7-4.1] L/min.m2, p = nonsignificant) but greater with epinephrine (4.1 [3.5-4.4] p <.01 vs. dopamine and norepinephrine). Splanchnic blood flow was similar with the three agents (732 [413-1483] vs. 746 [470-1401] vs. 653 [476-1832] mL/min.m, p = nonsignificant). The gradient between mixed-venous and hepatic venous oxygen saturations was lower with dopamine than with norepinephrine and epinephrine, but the Pco(2) gap was similar with the three agents. In severe shock, cardiac index was higher, but splanchnic blood flow was lower, with epinephrine than with norepinephrine (4.6 [3.7-5.3] vs. 3.4 [3.0-4.1] L/min.m2, p <.01 and 860 [684-1334] vs. 977 [806-1802] mL/min.m2, p <.05, respectively). Epinephrine increased the mixed-venous and hepatic venous oxygen saturation gradient but did not alter Pco(2) gap. Dopamine and norepinephrine have similar hemodynamic effects, but epinephrine can impair splanchnic circulation in severe septic shock.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article