23
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) among Healthcare Workers in Saudi Arabia: Comparing Case and Control Hospitals

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Healthcare workers (HCWs) stand at the frontline for fighting coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This puts them at higher risk of acquiring the infection than other individuals in the community. Defining immunity status among health care workers is therefore of interest since it helps to mitigate the exposure risk.

          Study Design

          Eighty-five hospitals across KSA were divided into two groups: COVID-19 referral hospitals are those to which RT-PCR-confirmed COVID-19 patients were admitted or referred for management (Case-hospitals). COVID-19 non-affected hospitals where no COVID-19 patients had been admitted or managed and no HCW outbreak (Control hospitals). Next, seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 among healthcare workers (HCWs) was evaluated; there were 12,621 HCWs from the 85 hospitals.

          Result

          There were 61 case-hospitals with 9,379 (74.3%) observations, and 24 control-hospitals with 3,242 (25.7%) observations. The overall positivity rate by the immunoassay was 299 (2.36%) with a significant difference between the case-hospital (2.9%) and the control-group (0.8%) (P value <0.001). There was a wide variation in the positivity rate between regions/cities in Saudi Arabia, ranging from 0% to 6.31%. Of the serology positive samples, 100 samples were further tested using the SAS2pp neutralisation assay; 92 (92%) samples showed neutralisation activity.

          Conclusion

          The seropositivity rate in KSA is low and varies across different regions with higher positivity in case-hospitals than control-hospitals. The lack of NAb in 8% of the tested samples could mean that assay is a more sensitive assay or that neutralisation assay has a lower detection limits; or possibly that some samples had cross-reaction to spike protein of other coronaviruses in the assay, but these were not specific to neutralize SARS-CoV-2.

          Related collections

          Most cited references33

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Seroprevalence of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 among health care workers in a large Spanish reference hospital

          Health care workers (HCW) are a high-risk population to acquire SARS-CoV-2 infection from patients or other fellow HCW. This study aims at estimating the seroprevalence against SARS-CoV-2 in a random sample of HCW from a large hospital in Spain. Of the 578 participants recruited from 28 March to 9 April 2020, 54 (9.3%, 95% CI: 7.1–12.0) were seropositive for IgM and/or IgG and/or IgA against SARS-CoV-2. The cumulative prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection (presence of antibodies or past or current positive rRT-PCR) was 11.2% (65/578, 95% CI: 8.8–14.1). Among those with evidence of past or current infection, 40.0% (26/65) had not been previously diagnosed with COVID-19. Here we report a relatively low seroprevalence of antibodies among HCW at the peak of the COVID-19 epidemic in Spain. A large proportion of HCW with past or present infection had not been previously diagnosed with COVID-19, which calls for active periodic rRT-PCR testing in hospital settings.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Protecting healthcare workers from SARS-CoV-2 infection: practical indications

            The World Health Organization has recently defined the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection a pandemic. The infection, that may cause a potentially very severe respiratory disease, now called coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), has airborne transmission via droplets. The rate of transmission is quite high, higher than common influenza. Healthcare workers are at high risk of contracting the infection particularly when applying respiratory devices such as oxygen cannulas or noninvasive ventilation. The aim of this article is to provide evidence-based recommendations for the correct use of “respiratory devices” in the COVID-19 emergency and protect healthcare workers from contracting the SARS-CoV-2 infection.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Specific risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 transmission among health care workers in a university hospital

              Highlights • HCWs face a high risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission during serving health care • Transmission may also occur in non-medical areas while speaking or eating • Proper use of PPE and basic infection control precautions are essential
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis
                Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis
                Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
                Elsevier Inc.
                0732-8893
                1879-0070
                20 November 2020
                20 November 2020
                : 115273
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Executive Department of Global Health, Epidemiology, surveillance and preparedness affairs, Executive Department of Research, Saudi Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
                [2 ]Infectious Disease Unit, Specialty Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins Aramco Healthcare, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia
                [3 ]Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
                [4 ]Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
                [5 ]Vaccine Development Unit, Department of Infectious Disease Research, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
                [6 ]King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
                [7 ]Department of medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
                [8 ]Infection and Control Department, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
                [9 ]Public Health Lab, Saudi Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
                [10 ]Department of Medical Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
                [11 ]Vaccines and Immunotherapy Unit, King Fahd Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
                [12 ]Research department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
                [13 ]Public Health, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
                [14 ]Saudi Cenetr for Disease Control and Prevention, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
                [15 ]Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: Dr. Haleema Ali Alserehi, Executive Department of Global Health, Saudi Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
                [** ]Correspondence: Jaffar A. Al-Tawfiq, Johns Hopkins Aramco Healthcare, Dhahran 31311, Saudi Arabia. Tel: +966-13-870-3524; fax: +966-13-870-3790.
                Article
                S0732-8893(20)30650-7 115273
                10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2020.115273
                7677039
                33296851
                6a9c8bff-a5b5-4522-9ac3-b5e0116d54f8
                © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                : 20 September 2020
                : 15 November 2020
                Categories
                Article

                Microbiology & Virology
                Microbiology & Virology

                Comments

                Comment on this article