57
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Implementing evidence-based interventions in health care: application of the replicating effective programs framework

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          We describe the use of a conceptual framework and implementation protocol to prepare effective health services interventions for implementation in community-based ( i.e., non-academic-affiliated) settings.

          Methods

          The framework is based on the experiences of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Replicating Effective Programs (REP) project, which has been at the forefront of developing systematic and effective strategies to prepare HIV interventions for dissemination. This article describes the REP framework, and how it can be applied to implement clinical and health services interventions in community-based organizations.

          Results

          REP consists of four phases: pre-conditions ( e.g., identifying need, target population, and suitable intervention), pre-implementation ( e.g., intervention packaging and community input), implementation ( e.g., package dissemination, training, technical assistance, and evaluation), and maintenance and evolution ( e.g., preparing the intervention for sustainability). Key components of REP, including intervention packaging, training, technical assistance, and fidelity assessment are crucial to the implementation of effective interventions in health care.

          Conclusion

          REP is a well-suited framework for implementing health care interventions, as it specifies steps needed to maximize fidelity while allowing opportunities for flexibility ( i.e., local customizing) to maximize transferability. Strategies that foster the sustainability of REP as a tool to implement effective health care interventions need to be developed and tested.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Difusión of Innovations

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A conceptual framework for transferring research to practice.

            Systematic evaluations of efforts to transfer research-based interventions and procedures into general practice at community drug treatment programs have been limited. However, practical experiences as well as results from studies of technology transfer and organizational behavior in related fields provide a basis for proposing a heuristic model of key factors that influence this process. The successful completion of four stages of activity typically involved in program change (exposure, adoption, implementation, and practice of new interventions) appears to be influenced by several organizational considerations (e.g., institutional readiness for change, resources, and climate) as well as staff attributes. Assessment instruments for measuring organizational functioning (based on ratings aggregated for staff and patients in a program) are introduced, along with preliminary evidence for their validity. A better conceptual understanding of the process of program change and common barriers that may be encountered is needed for effectively transferring research to practice.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Creating the evidence base for quality improvement collaboratives.

              B Mittman (2004)
              Intensive efforts are under way to improve health care quality and safety throughout the United States and abroad. Many of these efforts use the quality improvement collaborative method, an approach emphasizing collaborative learning and exchange of insights and support among a set of health care organizations. Unfortunately, the widespread acceptance and reliance on this approach are based not on solid evidence but on shared beliefs and anecdotal affirmations that may overstate the actual effectiveness of the method. More effective use of the collaborative method will require a commitment by users, researchers, and other stakeholders to rigorous, objective evaluation and the creation of a valid, useful knowledge and evidence base. Development of this evidence base will require improved conceptions of the nature of quality problems, quality improvement processes, and the types of research needed to elucidate these processes. Researchers, journal editors, and funding agencies must also cooperate to ensure that published evaluations are relevant, comprehensive, and cumulative.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Implement Sci
                Implementation science : IS
                BioMed Central
                1748-5908
                2007
                9 December 2007
                : 2
                : 42
                Affiliations
                [1 ]VA Ann Arbor National Serious Mental Illness Treatment Research and Evaluation Center; Ann Arbor, MI, USA
                [2 ]Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan; Ann Arbor, MI, USA
                [3 ]Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention; National Center for HIV, STD, and TB Prevention; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Atlanta, GA, USA
                [4 ]Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University; New York, NY, USA
                [5 ]VA Boston Healthcare System and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
                [6 ]Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh; Pittsburgh, PA, USA
                Article
                1748-5908-2-42
                10.1186/1748-5908-2-42
                2248206
                18067681
                6aaddd02-7b6a-48d8-8a7e-b175d6be248e
                Copyright © 2007 Kilbourne et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 18 July 2006
                : 9 December 2007
                Categories
                Methodology

                Medicine
                Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article