1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Assessment of the relationships between agroecosystem condition and the ecosystem service soil erosion regulation in Northern Germany

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Ecosystems provide multiple services that are necessary to maintain human life. Agroecosystems are very productive suppliers of biomass-related provisioning ecosystem services, e.g. food, fibre, and energy. At the same time, they are highly dependent on good ecosystem condition and regulating ecosystem services such as soil fertility, water supply or soil erosion regulation. Assessments of this interplay of ecosystem condition and services are needed to understand the relationships in highly managed systems. Therefore, the aim of this study is twofold: First, to test the concept and indicators proposed by the European Union Working Group on Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services (MAES) for assessing agroecosystem condition at a regional level. Second, to identify the relationships between ecosystem condition and the delivery of ecosystem services. For this purpose, we applied an operational framework for integrated mapping and assessment of ecosystems and their services. We used the proposed indicators to assess the condition of agroecosystems in Northern Germany and regulating ecosystem service control of erosion rates. We used existing data from official databases to calculate the different indicators and created maps of environmental pressures, ecosystem condition and ecosystem service indicators for the Federal State of Lower Saxony. Furthermore, we identified areas within the state where pressures are high, conditions are unfavourable, and more sustainable management practices are needed. Despite the limitations of the indicators and data availability, our results show positive, negative, and no significant correlations between the different pressures and condition indicators, and the control of erosion rates. The idea behind the MAES framework is to indicate the general condition of an ecosystem. However, we observed that not all proposed indicators can explain to what extent ecosystems can provide specific ecosystem services. Further research on other ecosystem services provided by agroecosystems would help to identify synergies and trade-offs. Moreover, the definition of a reference condition, although complicated for anthropogenically highly modified agroecosystems, would provide a benchmark to compare information on the condition of the ecosystems, leading to better land use policy and management decisions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references59

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance Analysis

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Ecosystem services and dis-services to agriculture

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Data curationRole: InvestigationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: MethodologyRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS One
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                7 December 2020
                2020
                : 15
                : 12
                : e0234288
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Institute of Physical Geography & Landscape Ecology, Leibniz University of Hannover, Hannover, Germany
                [2 ] Institute of Geography, Christian Albrechts University, Kiel, Germany
                [3 ] Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Müncheberg, Germany
                Chinese Academy of Forestry, CHINA
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0277-1365
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9926-8028
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4648-1650
                Article
                PONE-D-20-15438
                10.1371/journal.pone.0234288
                7721136
                33284810
                6ab24dea-6dca-4b5d-a0a8-b22db3e0e086
                © 2020 Rendon et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 22 May 2020
                : 19 November 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 7, Tables: 1, Pages: 28
                Funding
                The publication of this article was funded by the Open Access Publishing Fund of Leibniz Universität Hannover.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Ecology
                Ecosystems
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Ecology
                Ecosystems
                Earth Sciences
                Geomorphology
                Erosion
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Agriculture
                Agricultural Soil Science
                Earth Sciences
                Soil Science
                Agricultural Soil Science
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Agriculture
                Crop Science
                Crops
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Ecology
                Community Ecology
                Ecological Risk
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Ecology
                Community Ecology
                Ecological Risk
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Ecology
                Biodiversity
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Ecology
                Biodiversity
                Earth Sciences
                Soil Science
                Edaphology
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Conservation Science
                Custom metadata
                The data underlying the results presented in the study are available in the Supporting information S2.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article