52
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      A bright cyan-excitable orange fluorescent protein facilitates dual-emission microscopy and enhances bioluminescence imaging in vivo

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Orange-red fluorescent proteins (FPs) are widely used in biomedical research for multiplexed epifluorescence microscopy with GFP-based probes, but their different excitation requirements make multiplexing with new advanced microscopy methods difficult. Separately, orange-red FPs are useful for deep-tissue imaging in mammals due to the relative tissue transmissibility of orange-red light, but their dependence on illumination limits their sensitivity as reporters in deep tissues. Here we describe CyOFP1, a bright engineered orange-red FP that is excitable by cyan light. We show that CyOFP1 enables single-excitation multiplexed imaging with GFP-based probes in single-photon and two-photon microscopy, including time-lapse imaging in light-sheet systems. CyOFP1 also serves as an efficient acceptor for resonance energy transfer from the highly catalytic blue-emitting luciferase NanoLuc. An optimized fusion of CyOFP1 and NanoLuc, called Antares, functions as a highly sensitive bioluminescent reporter in vivo, producing substantially brighter signals from deep tissues than firefly luciferase and other bioluminescent proteins.

          Related collections

          Most cited references47

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Optimization of a GCaMP calcium indicator for neural activity imaging.

          Genetically encoded calcium indicators (GECIs) are powerful tools for systems neuroscience. Recent efforts in protein engineering have significantly increased the performance of GECIs. The state-of-the art single-wavelength GECI, GCaMP3, has been deployed in a number of model organisms and can reliably detect three or more action potentials in short bursts in several systems in vivo. Through protein structure determination, targeted mutagenesis, high-throughput screening, and a battery of in vitro assays, we have increased the dynamic range of GCaMP3 by severalfold, creating a family of "GCaMP5" sensors. We tested GCaMP5s in several systems: cultured neurons and astrocytes, mouse retina, and in vivo in Caenorhabditis chemosensory neurons, Drosophila larval neuromuscular junction and adult antennal lobe, zebrafish retina and tectum, and mouse visual cortex. Signal-to-noise ratio was improved by at least 2- to 3-fold. In the visual cortex, two GCaMP5 variants detected twice as many visual stimulus-responsive cells as GCaMP3. By combining in vivo imaging with electrophysiology we show that GCaMP5 fluorescence provides a more reliable measure of neuronal activity than its predecessor GCaMP3. GCaMP5 allows more sensitive detection of neural activity in vivo and may find widespread applications for cellular imaging in general.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Improving FRET dynamic range with bright green and red fluorescent proteins

            A variety of genetically encoded reporters use changes in fluorescence (or Förster) resonance energy transfer (FRET) to report on biochemical processes in living cells. The standard genetically encoded FRET pair consists of cyan and yellow fluorescent proteins (CFP and YFP), but many CFP-YFP reporters suffer from low FRET dynamic range, phototoxicity from the CFP excitation light, and complex photokinetic events such as reversible photobleaching and photoconversion. Here, we engineered two fluorescent proteins, Clover and mRuby2, which are the brightest green and red fluorescent proteins to date, and have the highest Förster radius of any ratiometric FRET pair yet described. Replacement of CFP and YFP in reporters of kinase activity, small GTPase activity, and transmembrane voltage significantly improves photostability, FRET dynamic range, and emission ratio changes. These improvements enhance detection of transient biochemical events such as neuronal action potential firing and RhoA activation in growth cones.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              ADVANCED IMAGING. Extended-resolution structured illumination imaging of endocytic and cytoskeletal dynamics.

              Super-resolution fluorescence microscopy is distinct among nanoscale imaging tools in its ability to image protein dynamics in living cells. Structured illumination microscopy (SIM) stands out in this regard because of its high speed and low illumination intensities, but typically offers only a twofold resolution gain. We extended the resolution of live-cell SIM through two approaches: ultrahigh numerical aperture SIM at 84-nanometer lateral resolution for more than 100 multicolor frames, and nonlinear SIM with patterned activation at 45- to 62-nanometer resolution for approximately 20 to 40 frames. We applied these approaches to image dynamics near the plasma membrane of spatially resolved assemblies of clathrin and caveolin, Rab5a in early endosomes, and α-actinin, often in relationship to cortical actin. In addition, we examined mitochondria, actin, and the Golgi apparatus dynamics in three dimensions.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                9604648
                20305
                Nat Biotechnol
                Nat. Biotechnol.
                Nature biotechnology
                1087-0156
                1546-1696
                30 March 2016
                30 May 2016
                July 2016
                30 November 2016
                : 34
                : 7
                : 760-767
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
                [2 ]Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
                [3 ]Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
                [4 ]Department of Chemistry, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
                [5 ]Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, Virginia, USA
                [6 ]Max Planck Florida Institute, Jupiter, Florida, USA
                [7 ]Department of Cell Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
                [8 ]Department of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
                [9 ]Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, USA
                [10 ]National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, USA
                [11 ]University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
                Author notes
                Correspondence should be addressed to M.Z.L. mzlin@ 123456stanford.edu
                [*]

                Current address: Research Lab for Biomedical Optics and Molecular Imaging, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.

                Article
                NIHMS772085
                10.1038/nbt.3550
                4942401
                27240196
                6ab3eb99-652d-4f9d-bba0-6d155b24b85c

                Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use: http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms

                History
                Categories
                Article

                Biotechnology
                Biotechnology

                Comments

                Comment on this article