11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Nordic back pain subpopulation program: predicting outcome among chiropractic patients in Finland

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          In a previous Swedish study it was shown that it is possible to predict which chiropractic patients with persistent LBP will not report definite improvement early in the course of treatment, namely those with LBP for altogether at least 30 days in the past year, who had leg pain, and who did not report definite general improvement by the second treatment. The objectives of this study were to investigate if the predictive value of this set of variables could be reproduced among chiropractic patients in Finland, and if the model could be improved by adding some new potential predictor variables.

          Methods

          The study was a multi-centre prospective outcome study with internal control groups, carried out in private chiropractic practices in Finland. Chiropractors collected data at the 1st, 2 nd and 4 th visits using standardized questionnaires on new patients with LBP and/or radiating leg pain. Status at base-line was identified in relation to pain and disability, at the 2 nd visit in relation to disability, and "definitely better" at the 4 th visit in relation to a global assessment. The Swedish questionnaire was used including three new questions on general health, pain in other parts of the spine, and body mass index.

          Results

          The Swedish model was reproduced in this study sample. An alternative model including leg pain (yes/no), improvement at 2 nd visit (yes/no) and BMI (underweight/normal/overweight or obese) was also identified with similar predictive values. Common throughout the testing of various models was that improvement at the 2 nd visit had an odds ratio of approximately 5. Additional analyses revealed a dose-response in that 84% of those patients who fulfilled none of these (bad) criteria were classified as "definitely better" at the 4 th visit, vs. 75%, 60% and 34% of those who fulfilled 1, 2 or all 3 of the criteria, respectively.

          Conclusion

          When treating patients with LBP, at the first visits, the treatment strategy should be different for overweight/obese patients with leg pain as it should be for all patients who fail to improve by the 2 nd visit. The number of predictors is also important.

          Related collections

          Most cited references12

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Evidence-informed management of chronic low back pain with spinal manipulation and mobilization.

          The management of chronic low back pain (CLBP) has proven very challenging in North America, as evidenced by its mounting socioeconomic burden. Choosing among available nonsurgical therapies can be overwhelming for many stakeholders, including patients, health providers, policy makers, and third-party payers. Although all parties share a common goal and wish to use limited health-care resources to support interventions most likely to result in clinically meaningful improvements, there is often uncertainty about the most appropriate intervention for a particular patient. To help understand and evaluate the various commonly used nonsurgical approaches to CLBP, the North American Spine Society has sponsored this special focus issue of The Spine Journal, titled Evidence Informed Management of Chronic Low Back Pain Without Surgery. Articles in this special focus issue were contributed by leading spine practitioners and researchers, who were invited to summarize the best available evidence for a particular intervention and encouraged to make this information accessible to nonexperts. Each of the articles contains five sections (description, theory, evidence of efficacy, harms, and summary) with common subheadings to facilitate comparison across the 24 different interventions profiled in this special focus issue, blending narrative and systematic review methodology as deemed appropriate by the authors. It is hoped that articles in this special focus issue will be informative and aid in decision making for the many stakeholders evaluating nonsurgical interventions for CLBP.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The nordic back pain subpopulation program: demographic and clinical predictors for outcome in patients receiving chiropractic treatment for persistent low back pain.

            To identify demographic and clinic-related predictors for successful outcome in patients with persistent low-back pain who received chiropractic treatment. Prospective uncontrolled multicenter study with internal control groups. Each of 115 Norwegian chiropractors, out of 205 invited, were asked to recruit 10 consecutive patients who had low-back pain for at least 2 weeks at the time of consultation and a minimum of 30 days altogether within the preceding year. In all, 875 patients were included at baseline. The response rates at the fourth visit and at 3 and 12 months were 799, 598, and 512, respectively. Baseline data were obtained through questionnaires administered to chiropractic patients and to their treating chiropractors; clinical information was obtained through questionnaires at the fourth visit from patients and chiropractors. Outcome was obtained from patients at the fourth visit. Mail surveys of patients were conducted after 3 and 12 months, and additional information was obtained from chiropractors at 12 months in relation to treatment history. POTENTIAL PREDICTORS: Demography and information on past and present history, clinical findings, and prognosis. Number of low-back pain"free patients (defined as those with a maximum pain score of 1/10 and a maximum Oswestry score of 15/100). Positive predictive values and relative risks were calculated for each categorized predictor variable singly and in combination in relation to being low-back pain free at the 3 follow-up surveys. Treatment outcome at the fourth visit was best predicted by a model containing the following 5 variables: sex, social benefit, severity of pain, duration of continuous pain at first consultation, and additional neck pain (odds ratios between 2.2 and 4.3). A similar profile was found at 3 months, but 2 different variables (relating to disability) were the final variables in relation to the 12-month status. These final models were best at predicting absence of treatment success. Being low-back pain free at the fourth visit was a strong predictor for being low-back pain free both at 3 months and 12 months, with relative risks of 3.0 (2.2-4.8) and 3.1 (1.5-6.5), respectively. In patients with persistent low-back pain, it is possible to exclude from treatment those who are unlikely to become low-back pain free after chiropractic care and to do this before they have been examined clinically. Early recovery is a strong predictor for outcome up to 1 year later.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Frequency and characteristics of side effects of spinal manipulative therapy.

              A prospective clinic-based survey. To study the type, frequency, and characteristics of unpleasant side effects after spinal manipulative therapy. Spinal manipulative therapy is a commonly used treatment, but there is little knowledge of its side effects. Information regarding unpleasant reactions after spinal manipulative therapy was collected after 4712 treatments on 1058 new patients by 102 Norwegian chiropractors (response rate, 70%) through structured interviews. At least one reaction was reported by 55% of the patients some time during the course of a maximum of six treatments. Of the reported reactions, the most common were local discomfort (53%), headache (12%), tiredness (11%), or radiating discomfort (10%). Reactions were mild or moderate in 85% of patients. Sixty-four percent of reactions appeared within 4 hours of treatment, and 74% had disappeared within 24 hours. Uncommon reactions were dizziness, nausea, hot skin, or "other" complaints, each accounting for 5% or less of reactions. It was unusual that symptoms commenced later than on the day of or the day after treatment, were of long duration (not gone at the latest on the day after onset), described as severe, or that they resulted in reduced activities of daily living. There were no reports of serious complications in this study. Profiles now are described of common and uncommon reactions to spinal manipulative therapy and their latency, duration, and severity.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Chiropr Osteopat
                Chiropractic & Osteopathy
                BioMed Central
                1746-1340
                2008
                7 November 2008
                : 16
                : 13
                Affiliations
                [1 ]The Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stavanger, and the Norwegian Centre for Movement Disorders, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
                [2 ]Research Professor, Nordic Institute for Chiropractic and Clinical Biomechanics, part of Clinical Locomotion Science, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
                [3 ]Private Practice, Kangasala, Finland
                [4 ]Private Practice, Helsinki, Finland
                [5 ]Private Practice, Tampere, Finland
                [6 ]Private Practice, Lahti, Finland
                [7 ]Consultant, The Back Research Centre, part of Clinical Locomotion Science, University of Southern Denmark, Ringe, Denmark
                Article
                1746-1340-16-13
                10.1186/1746-1340-16-13
                2588613
                18992154
                6acdc2f9-111a-4a04-a5d4-b6b850f5d5f2
                Copyright © 2008 Malmqvist et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 25 September 2008
                : 7 November 2008
                Categories
                Research

                Orthopedics
                Orthopedics

                Comments

                Comment on this article