24
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Assessment of the potential for international dissemination of Ebola virus via commercial air travel during the 2014 west African outbreak

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          Background

          The WHO declared the 2014 west African Ebola epidemic a public health emergency of international concern in view of its potential for further international spread. Decision makers worldwide are in need of empirical data to inform and implement emergency response measures. Our aim was to assess the potential for Ebola virus to spread across international borders via commercial air travel and assess the relative efficiency of exit versus entry screening of travellers at commercial airports.

          Methods

          We analysed International Air Transport Association data for worldwide flight schedules between Sept 1, 2014, and Dec 31, 2014, and historic traveller flight itinerary data from 2013 to describe expected global population movements via commercial air travel out of Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone. Coupled with Ebola virus surveillance data, we modelled the expected number of internationally exported Ebola virus infections, the potential effect of air travel restrictions, and the efficiency of airport-based traveller screening at international ports of entry and exit. We deemed individuals initiating travel from any domestic or international airport within these three countries to have possible exposure to Ebola virus. We deemed all other travellers to have no significant risk of exposure to Ebola virus.

          Findings

          Based on epidemic conditions and international flight restrictions to and from Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone as of Sept 1, 2014 (reductions in passenger seats by 51% for Liberia, 66% for Guinea, and 85% for Sierra Leone), our model projects 2·8 travellers infected with Ebola virus departing the above three countries via commercial flights, on average, every month. 91 547 (64%) of all air travellers departing Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone had expected destinations in low-income and lower-middle-income countries. Screening international travellers departing three airports would enable health assessments of all travellers at highest risk of exposure to Ebola virus infection.

          Interpretation

          Decision makers must carefully balance the potential harms from travel restrictions imposed on countries that have Ebola virus activity against any potential reductions in risk from Ebola virus importations. Exit screening of travellers at airports in Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone would be the most efficient frontier at which to assess the health status of travellers at risk of Ebola virus exposure, however, this intervention might require international support to implement effectively.

          Funding

          Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

          Related collections

          Most cited references12

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Spread of a novel influenza A (H1N1) virus via global airline transportation.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Illness in travelers visiting friends and relatives: a review of the GeoSentinel Surveillance Network.

            Travelers returning to their country of origin to visit friends and relatives (VFRs) have increased risk of travel-related health problems. We examined GeoSentinel data to compare travel characteristics and illnesses acquired by 3 groups of travelers to low-income countries: VFRs who had originally been immigrants (immigrant VFRs), VFRs who had not originally been immigrants (traveler VFRs), and tourist travelers. Immigrant VFRs were predominantly male, had a higher mean age, and disproportionately required treatment as inpatients. Only 16% of immigrant VFRs sought pretravel medical advice. Proportionately more immigrant VFRs visited sub-Saharan Africa and traveled for >30 days, whereas tourist travelers more often traveled to Asia. Systemic febrile illnesses (including malaria), nondiarrheal intestinal parasitic infections, respiratory syndromes, tuberculosis, and sexually transmitted diseases were more commonly diagnosed among immigrant VFRs, whereas acute diarrhea was comparatively less frequent. Immigrant VFRs and traveler VFRs had different demographic characteristics and types of travel-related illnesses. A greater proportion of immigrant VFRs presented with serious, potentially preventable travel-related illnesses than did tourist travelers.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Ebola virus disease in West Africa--no early end to the outbreak.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Lancet
                Lancet
                Lancet
                Lancet Publishing Group
                0140-6736
                1474-547X
                3 January 2015
                3 January 2015
                : 385
                : 9962
                : 29-35
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
                [b ]Divisions of Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
                [c ]Centre for Research on Inner City Health, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
                [d ]Division of Global Migration and Quarantine, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
                [e ]Center for Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
                [f ]Children's Hospital Informatics Program, Boston Children's Hospital Boston, MA, USA
                [g ]Quarantine and Border Health Services Branch, Division of Global Migration and Quarantine, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
                [h ]Health Security Infrastructure Branch, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada
                [i ]Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
                [j ]Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
                [k ]Spatial Ecology and Epidemiology Group, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
                [l ]Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
                [m ]Department of Geography and Environment, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
                [n ]Flowminder Foundation, Stockholm, Sweden
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence to: Dr Kamran Khan, St Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada khank@ 123456smh.ca
                Article
                S0140-6736(14)61828-6
                10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61828-6
                4286618
                25458732
                6ad662b3-6f4f-420d-ba29-e8437c63ddc3
                © 2015 Bogoch et al. Open Access article distributed under the terms of CC BY

                This document may be redistributed and reused, subject to certain conditions.

                History
                Categories
                Articles

                Medicine
                Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article