8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Identification of Sindhi cows that are susceptible or resistant to Haematobia irritans Translated title: Identificação de vacas Sindhi que são suscetíveis ou resistentes à Haematobia irritans

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Abstract To identify susceptible and resistant Haematobia irritans cows, horn flies were counted biweekly for 3 years in a herd of 25 Sindhi cows. Repeated measures linear mixed models were created including cow as a random factor. The results were analyzed by: 1) observing horn fly counts, considering fly-susceptible cows with infestations appearing in the upper quartile more than 50% of the weeks and in the lower quartile less than 20% of the weeks, and fly-resistant cows those that the number of flies was in the lower quartile more than 50% of the weeks and in the upper quartile less than 20%; 2) by the best linear unbiased predictions (BLUPs), to evaluate the cow effect on fly counts. Fly-susceptible cows were those in which the infestation appeared in the 90th percentile of the BLUPs, whereas fly-resistant cows appeared in the 10th percentile. For the observational method the individuals identified as resistant varied between 8% and 20% and 8% to 12% were susceptible. For the BLUP method, the rates of susceptible and resistant cows were 12%. The agreement among methods suggests that susceptible cows can be identified by observations of fly counts, allowing for selective breeding, culling or treatment.

          Translated abstract

          Resumo Para identificar vacas susceptíveis e resistentes à Haematobia irritans, moscas-dos-chifres foram contadas quinzenalmente durante três anos em 25 vacas de um rebanho Sindhi. Modelos lineares de medidas repetidas foram criados, analisando os resultados de duas formas: 1) pela contagem das moscas, considerando susceptíveis as vacas nas quais a infestação aparecia no quartil superior mais de 50% das semanas e no quartil inferior menos de 20% das semanas. Vacas resistentes foram consideradas aquelas nas quais o número de moscas apareceu no quartil inferior mais de 50% das semanas e no quartil superior menos de 20% das semanas; 2) pela melhor predição linear não-viesada (BLUP), para avaliar o efeito das vacas na contagem de moscas. As vacas foram consideradas susceptíveis quando apareciam no percentil 90 dos BLUPs e resistentes quando apareciam no percentil 10. O método observacional identificou 8% a 20% de indivíduos resistentes e 8% a 12% de susceptíveis. O método dos BLUPs identificou igual taxa de 12% de indivíduos susceptíveis e resistentes. A forte concordância entre estes dois métodos sugere que as vacas susceptíveis podem ser identificadas pela contagem das moscas, o que permite estabelecer seleção dos animais resistentes ou tratamento ou eliminação dos mais susceptíveis.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Reassessment of the potential economic impact of cattle parasites in Brazil

          The profitability of livestock activities can be diminished significantly by the effects of parasites. Economic losses caused by cattle parasites in Brazil were estimated on an annual basis, considering the total number of animals at risk and the potential detrimental effects of parasitism on cattle productivity. Estimates in U.S. dollars (USD) were based on reported yield losses among untreated animals and reflected some of the effects of parasitic diseases. Relevant parasites that affect cattle productivity in Brazil, and their economic impact in USD billions include: gastrointestinal nematodes - $7.11; cattle tick (Rhipicephalus(Boophilus) microplus) - $3.24; horn fly (Haematobia irritans) - $2.56; cattle grub (Dermatobia hominis) - $0.38; New World screwworm fly (Cochliomyia hominivorax) - $0.34; and stable fly (Stomoxys calcitrans) - $0.34. The combined annual economic loss due to internal and external parasites of cattle in Brazil considered here was estimated to be at least USD 13.96 billion. These findings are discussed in the context of methodologies and research that are required in order to improve the accuracy of these economic impact assessments. This information needs to be taken into consideration when developing sustainable policies for mitigating the impact of parasitism on the profitability of Brazilian cattle producers.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Biology and control of tabanids, stable flies and horn flies.

            Tabanids are among the most free-living adult flies which play a role as livestock pests. A single blood meal is used as a source of energy for egg production (100-1,000 eggs per meal), and females of certain species can oviposit before a blood meal is obtained (autogeny). Therefore, the maintenance of annual populations requires successful oviposition by only 2% of females. Wild animal blood sources are usually available to maintain annual tabanid populations. Larval habitats are also independent of domestic livestock. Thus, the use of repellents or partial repellents is the only effective chemical strategy to reduce the incidence of tabanids on livestock. Permanent traps (and possibly treated silhouette traps) can be employed to intercept flies. Selective grazing or confinement can also reduce the impact of tabanids. Stable fly adults are dependent on vertebrate blood for survival and reproduction, but the amount of time spent in contact with the host is relatively small. Stable fly larvae develop in manure, spilled feed and decaying vegetation. Management of larval habitats by sanitation is the key to stable fly control. Treatment of animals with residual insecticides can aid in control; thorough application to the lower body parts of livestock is important. Proper use of modified traps, using either treated targets or solar-powered electrocution grids, can be effective in reducing stable fly populations. Adult horn flies spend the major part of their time on the host, and the larvae are confined to bovid manure. Therefore, almost any form of topical insecticide application for livestock is effective against horn flies, in the absence of insecticide resistance. Treatments should be applied when economic benefit is possible; economic gains are associated with increased weaning weights and weight gains of yearling and growing cattle. Oral chemical treatments (insect growth regulators or insecticides) administered at appropriate rates via bolus, water, food or mineral mixtures can inhibit horn fly larval development. However, adult horn fly movement among cattle herds limits the use of larval control for horn fly population management. The augmentation of native parasites, predators and competitors has been attempted and even promoted for horn fly and stable fly control, but evidence for the success of such programmes is equivocal.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Variation in the load of the horn fly, Haematobia irritans, in cattle herds is determined by the presence or absence of individual heifers.

              The distribution of horn flies, Haematobia irritans (L.) (Diptera: Muscidae), in herds of Danish Holstein-Friesian cattle was investigated in two studies conducted during two field seasons. In the first study, highly significant differences in fly distribution between the most and the least fly-susceptible heifers were observed. In one herd, the mean difference between the most fly-susceptible and the most fly-resistant heifers was 268 Ha. irritans specimens. The highest ratio between upper and lower mean fly number was 64.1:1, whereas the lowest was 3.1:1. In the second year, it was demonstrated that the heifers kept their rank in fly attraction over time. The trial clearly demonstrated that some heifers were attracting flies, whereas others, even in the same herd, only carried a few. In the second study, heifers were moved in and out of herds in an attempt to manipulate fly loads in the herds. In year 1, one herd (herd A) received four fly-resistant heifers from another herd (herd B), resulting in a drop in the mean number of flies, whereas herd B received four fly-susceptible heifers from herd A, resulting in an elevation of the mean number of flies. In year 2, a similar pattern emerged using herds C and D, and when the cattle were later returned to their original herds, the fly loads returned to their original distribution. The data presented here show unequivocally that, for horn flies, there can be considerable differences in fly loads for individual heifers within the Holstein-Friesian breed. Furthermore, the overall fly load within herds can be manipulated, and can be reversed. Thus, the distribution in the number of flies within a herd appears to depend on the number of fly-resistant or fly-susceptible heifers. The possible role of chemical factors emitted by heifers, i.e. volatile semiochemicals, in determining differences in fly loads is discussed, whereby attractants are emitted by fly-susceptible heifers and enable flies to locate their host, and repellents are emitted by fly-resistant heifers such that the flies are actively repelled from the herd.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Journal
                rbpv
                Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária
                Rev. Bras. Parasitol. Vet.
                Colégio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinária (Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil )
                0103-846X
                1984-2961
                July 2019
                : 28
                : 3
                : 465-472
                Affiliations
                [04] Tacuarembó orgnameInstituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria orgdiv1Plataforma de Salud Animal Uruguay
                [01] Patos Paraíba orgnameUniversidade Federal de Campina Grande orgdiv1Centro de Saúde e Tecnologia Rural orgdiv2Hospital Veterinário Brazil
                [02] Porto Alegre orgnameCentro Universitário Ritter dos Reis orgdiv1Departamento de Medicina Veterinária Brazil
                [03] Campo Grande MS orgnameEmpresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária orgdiv1Centro Nacional de Pesquisa de Gado de Corte Brasil
                Article
                S1984-29612019000300465
                10.1590/s1984-29612019066
                6adecb23-7b5e-464a-8a03-52fd7bb15dc6

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 07 April 2019
                : 25 July 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 21, Pages: 8
                Product

                SciELO Brazil

                Categories
                Original Article

                bovinos,seleção animal,controle integrado,Horn fly,bovines,animal selection,integrated control,Mosca dos chifres

                Comments

                Comment on this article