9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Intimate partner violence during the COVID-19 pandemic in India: from psychiatric and forensic vantage points

      letter

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The COVID-19 pandemic has created an unprecedented impact on our society, which demands robust action to address the global crisis, which is of significance to psychiatry, as mentioned in the Asian Journal of Psychiatry (Tandon, 2020). Violence faced by women has outrageously increased since the COVID-19 outbreak. According to the World Health Organization, “Intimate partner violence is one of the most common forms of violence against women and includes physical, sexual, and emotional abuse and controlling behaviours by an intimate partner.” (World Health Organization, 2012) The restrictions due to lockdown and quarantine have caused domestic zones to become breeding grounds for intimate partner violence. Abusive individuals may use the restrictions to exert power over the vulnerable ones especially women, restricting access to essential commodities, services and deliver misinformation about COVID-19, thus, stigmatizing them. The enduring exposure of vulnerable persons to abusive individuals and the difficulty in communication due to social restrictions in the present scenario have caused a constraint for the victim to cope with this situation or obtain support (World Health Organization, 2020). Intimate partner violence at home is often under-reported and not adequately addressed at proper forums. It not only curtails human rights but specifically undermines the health, dignity, and security of the women. Although it can occur in both sexes, in a developing country like India with a patriarchal mindset, it is centered mostly around women. In India, women’s ability to resist and disclosure is limited owing to their economic imbalance and social support. The country witnessed a whopping 47.2% of total cases received by the National Commission of women were linked to domestic violence during April and May and a decline in other natural sexual offenses (Pandit, 2020). Various factors related to the perpetrator leading to such violence could be elevated stress levels as a result of restrictions, unemployment, financial worries, an increase in alcohol and substance use, exacerbation of pre-existent psychiatric illness and onset of new mental illness. Literature suggests that intimate partner violence exacerbates with increased alcohol and substance use in partners. Restrictions of lockdown may lead to increased stress, boredom, and in order to negate these feelings, people resort to alcohol and substance use. However, this can further lead to aggravation of anxiety, depressive symptoms, and aggression, especially in persons with personality disorders. Thus, the disturbed psychological health of the perpetrator may negatively affect the psychological wellbeing of the persons being abused. Women living in rural areas have an increased risk of being exposed to intimate partner violence (de Telles et al., 2020). Factors such as lower educational level, younger age, current unemployment, especially amongst those who are daily wage workers, increased responsibilities because of children being at home due to school closures and increased stress in the family, may make them more vulnerable for being abused by their partners (De Lima et al., 2020). In India, section 498 A Indian Penal Code (IPC) protects a woman from cruelty by her husband or relative of husband. However, this section has been quite narrower in its definition since cruelty was confined “to any willful conduct which is of such a nature as is likely to drive the woman to commit suicide or to cause grave injury or danger to life, limb or health (whether mental or physical) of the woman (clause a); or harassment of the woman where such harassment is with a view to coercing her or any person related to her to meet any unlawful demand for any property or valuable security or is on account of failure by her or any person related to her to meet such demand (clause b)” (Central Government Act, 1983). There are limitations to 498A such as the isolated singular act of beating is not covered under the definition and time limit for lodging complaints is three years from the incident. Consequently, an act “The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act 2005 was introduced. It is relatively broader, gender-specific, encompasses verbal, emotional, and economic abuses and also contains a part which mentions if the act “has the effect of threatening the aggrieved person or any person related to her by any conduct mentioned in the already mentioned clauses or otherwise injures or causes harm, whether physical or mental”. It strengthens the women’s right to make an application for obtaining relief by way of a protection order, an order for monetary relief, a custody order, a residence order, a compensation order, or more than one such order under this Act (Gazette of India, 2005). To address the challenges of intimate partner violence, various strategies for surveillance, prevention and timely reporting need to be adopted swiftly. Mental health professionals including psychiatrists, psychologists, psychiatric social workers and nurses should make it a routine to enquire from persons constantly about intimate partner violence even if they feel the slightest doubt. They may assess interpersonal issues in patients who are being consulted for substance and alcohol-related problems (de Telles et al., 2020). Various psychological interventions suggested to be useful for victims of intimate partner violence include formal cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), trauma focused CBT (TF-CBT), acceptance commitment therapy (ACT), mindfulness, interpersonal psychotherapy, skills training in affective and interpersonal regulation (STAIR), cognitive processing therapy, integrative therapies such as motivational interviewing, eye movement desensitisation reprocessing (EMDR), Helping to Overcome PTSD through Empowerment (HOPE, Relapse Prevention and Relationship Safety (RPRS) (Tan et al., 2018). India having an enormous diversity would require culturally competent interventions which focus on women’s support system and their respective community, which would be an efficient way to deal with such violence especially amongst daily wage workers migrant workers. It has been postulated that culturally specific strategies may be assist in reducing the incidence of intimate partner violence and the subsequent evolution of mental health issues (Klingspohn, 2018). Pharmacological management would include anxiolytics, anti-depressant medications, anti-psychotics and hypnotics as per the clinical presentation. Awareness of such issues should be brought to the community, which could make family members and neighbors to be vigilant and also increase reporting of such violence. A multi-disciplinary effort that would include the policymakers, local government, healthcare workers, humanitarian response teams, community workers, surveillance teams, and the public could help combat this menace, especially at this time of the pandemic and during the post pandemic era. (World Health Organization, 2020) Consideration of possible risk factors in the perpetrator and mental health issues they are affected with is important to deal with intimate partner violence. Table 1 shows a list of interventions which may be useful at various stages of intimate partner violence from before its occurrence, that is a preventive stage to treating the survivors. At the same time, it is necessary to address psychological issues such as acute stress reaction, anxiety, depression and post-traumatic stress disorder, in women facing such violence and also children who may be witnesses to it. Table 1 Various modes of stage-based interventions Table 1 Stage Intervention 1 Prevention Strong involvement of community members including local health workers Cultural specific campaign Communication campaign for advocacy, awareness and education via posters, brochures, media and other information technology aids Involvement of local religious leaders 2 Screening Use of empirically validated tools Development of culture specific tools Education of primary health care workers and specialists on evaluation of suspected victims of violence 3 Treatment of survivors Support groups and group counselling aimed at survivors Instilling specific coping strategies in domains such as placating, resistance, informal, legal Cognitive Behavioural therapy (CBT) Trauma focused CBT (TF-CBT) Acceptance commitment therapy (ACT) Mindfulness Interpersonal psychotherapy Skills training in affective and interpersonal regulation (STAIR) Cognitive processing therapy Integrative therapies such as motivational interviewing Eye movement desensitisation reprocessing (EMDR) Helping to Overcome PTSD through Empowerment (HOPE) Relapse Prevention and Relationship Safety (RPRS 4 Managing perpetrators Motivational interviewing Batterer group aimed at perpetrators Strong involvement of community members and local health care workers

          Related collections

          Most cited references5

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The COVID-19 Pandemic Personal Reflections on Editorial Responsibility

          I have just returned from a 1-week academic/journal-related visit to Qatar and am informed by my medical school Dean that I will have to quarantine myself for 2 weeks before I can return to work because “I may be bringing back COVID-19 contagion”. As I am somewhat familiar with COVID-19 happenings, I am confused (and somewhat annoyed) by this directive. Although COVID-19 has affected people in half the countries around the world and the vast majority of those affected are in Asia, Qatar has just a single reported case and this individual was airlifted from Iran and has been quarantined since arrival into Qatar. It is true that over 90 percent of the confirmed cases are in Asia (China, South Korea and Iran) and Italy is reporting a dramatic increase in the number of those affected with a lockdown being declared in Northern Italy earlier today, but my travels did not take me to any of those places- I went directly from the USA to Qatar and back. After providing this explanation and noting the absence of any COVID-19 relevant symptoms, I am allowed to return to work immediately without any restrictions. Even though COVID-19 has no direct impact on me other than causing mild consternation, it gets me thinking about how this pandemic (I am not quite sure why the World Health Organization has not labelled it as one yet) will affect people and if there is any useful role that I (as the Editor-in-Chief of the Asian Journal of Psychiatry) can and should perform. I start by thinking about what just happened to me. Fear and incomplete information likely contributed to a lack of understanding that, in turn, contributed to the initial determination that I should not return to work. The fear was understandable- this is a new virus that appears to be highly contagious and deadly, we have no immunity against this virus, and while experiences in South Korea and Taiwan provide some encouragement initial trends in Italy are disturbing. Once I provided clear information about where in Asia I had travelled and that this was not where there was high COVID-19 contagion, the initial decision was immediately reversed. Accurate information leading to clear understanding was the key to enabling appropriate decision-making. Do I have any ability and responsibility as a Journal editor to enable provision of accurate COVID-19 information that is both relevant and timely? First, I ask if this fits the mission/scope of the Journal (Tandon and Keshavan, 2019; Tandon, 2020)- “a vehicle for exchange of relevant information and dissemination of knowledge and understanding across the countries of Asia and to and from the rest of the world” by addressing the following two questions: (i) Is COVID-19 relevant to psychiatry and is Psychiatry relevant to COVID-19? My instinctive answer is “of course, it is” since any international medical crisis should be of relevance to psychiatry because of both the impact of the medical condition itself on people (directly on affected persons and indirectly on their family and friends) as also the effects of society’s response (e.g., quarantine, lock-down, etc.) on mental health. As I discuss this opinion with my medical colleagues (including some psychiatrists), their immediate response is in the negative- COVID-19 is a respiratory infection/disease requiring the attention of pulmonologists, intensive care specialists, infectious disease specialists, and epidemiologists, not psychiatrists. When I discuss the mental health effects of any epidemic on the general population with specific reference to COVID-19 (Wang et al., 2020), and specific mental health challenges faced by the above healthcare professionals (Chen et al., 2020), they promptly change their opinion (some reluctantly!) and acknowledge an important place for Psychiatry. (ii) Is there any unique Asia-specific and Asian country-specific information or understanding that is worth sharing? The answer to this question is an obvious “Yes”. COVID-19 began in Asia, different Asian countries took different approaches to anticipating and managing this challenge, results vary across these Asian countries, and as other Asian countries and those around the world confront their COVID-19 challenge, there may be much to learn from the experiences of various Asian countries (particularly China with Hong Kong, Taiwan, South Korea, Singapore, and Iran). Second, there are unique circumstances across Asia that constrain what is possible such as conflict (Brennan et al., 2020), refugee crises, and political/economic realities. Having answered the first question in the affirmative, the second question I ask myself is “What information should I help disseminate, how should I seek contributions providing such useful material, and how should I review such submissions rapidly, yet fairly and effectively, so that the Journal can make relevant information available to the field in a timely manner. At this time, we had received ten submissions related to COVID-19; after an expeditious review, we accepted four for publication while finding the other six unsuitable. We published a case report in the previous issue (Goyal et al., 2020) and now publish the other three reports in the current issue (Banerjee, 2020; Bhat et al., 2020; Yao et al., 2020). I have asked Dr. Desai to compile a basic primer on must-know facts about COVID-19 for psychiatrists, which will hopefully be published in the next issue of the Journal. I have also sent out a specific request for COVID-19 mental health relevant publications focused on Asia and plan to review any such submissions expeditiously and prioritize publication of accepted articles. I hope you will find this collection of value Although COVID-19 has already caused a significant amount of devastation, we appear to be in the early stages of responding to this epidemic- it should accurately be called a pandemic as it spans across the globe. As East Asia (China, South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore) appears to have weathered the initial storm, Europe appears to be the current epicenter with North America likely to be next. It is unclear as to how many cycles of COVID-19 each country may encounter. While COVID-19 presents a healthcare crisis, the economic paralysis that nations will experience because of current and future anticipated shutdowns/lockdowns and mandatory quarantines will likely be even more catastrophic. Even as there is a critical need for the world to collectively engage with the virus SARS-CoV-2 and the COVID-19 disease it causes, there is a discernible lack of leadership at a global level. Unfortunately, there is little global coordination thus far and nations appear to have adopted a solitary (forget about other countries; violent competition for scarce resources such as personal protective equipment and ventilators; blaming and at times abusing each other; etc.) and incoherent (too little, too late; mixed messaging; etc.) response to the challenge. There is much that we can do to support each other. There is much that we can learn from each other. I hope the Journal can play a small role in helping this happen.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Domestic violence in the COVID-19 pandemic: a forensic psychiatric perspective

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              COVID-19: Isolations, Quarantines and Domestic Violence in Rural Areas

              It was argued that the coronavirus pandemic is likely to lead to an increase in the occurrence of domestic violence incidents against women, while victims are forced to quarantine at home with potentially abusive family members. In this context, it was found that women living in rural areas are at increased risk. In defining their vulnerability was observed least school years, black race and young age (young women) of raped and abused women. The spouse was also identified as the main aggressor, who practiced physical violence, with recurrence, within the victim's own residence, associated with the abusive use of alcoholic beverages. It has alerted the world to this problem and called attention to the need to promote strategies to protect women. It is known that women and men experience pandemics in different ways and those circumstances, in addition to strengthening situations of women's vulnerability, tend to aggravate family tensions, especially in families with a history of recurrent domestic violence.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Asian J Psychiatr
                Asian J Psychiatr
                Asian Journal of Psychiatry
                Elsevier B.V.
                1876-2018
                1876-2026
                16 July 2020
                16 July 2020
                : 102279
                Affiliations
                [0005]Department of Psychiatry, Sikkim Manipal Institute of Medical Sciences, Sikkim Manipal University, Gangtok, Sikkim, India
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author. shijojj90@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                S1876-2018(20)30391-9 102279
                10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102279
                7365082
                32707512
                6ae699e9-21a1-428b-adb1-e30675fa8aad
                © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                : 23 June 2020
                Categories
                Article

                Comments

                Comment on this article