2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Evaluación del cumplimiento del protocolo de utilización de cloruro potásico Translated title: Evaluation of compliance with the guidelines for the safe use of potassium chloride

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          RESUMEN Objetivo: Analizar el grado de cumplimiento del “Protocolo de Utilización de Cloruro potásico” implantado en nuestro hospital, mediante la realización de auditorías periódicas presenciales, durante el periodo 2013-2016. Métodos: Estudio descriptivo de las auditorías realizadas a los 6 meses post-implantación (principios de 2013), y después cada año (2014-2016). Los indicadores de evaluación se establecen siguiendo las recomendaciones recogidas en el Protocolo y se refieren al almacenamiento, prescripción, preparación y administración de soluciones de potasio. Las unidades asistenciales evaluadas son: unidades autorizadas (almacenamiento y doble chequeo en la preparación y antes de la administración) y en todas las unidades de críticos y urgencias clínicas (prescripción y etiquetado correcto para su administración). Resultados: Se audita un total de 55 unidades asistenciales, que han mostrado un 100% de cumplimiento para los indicadores referentes a prescripción y etiquetado correcto. De dichas unidades, 12 (críticos y urgencias) están autorizadas para disponer de ampollas de cloruro potásico 1M. En estas 12, no se obtuvo un cumplimiento correcto de los otros dos indicadores, debido a que una no realizó su almacenamiento de forma adecuada (2014) y, en otras tampoco se cumplimentó el registro de doble chequeo (3 en 2013, 1 en 2014 y 2015). Conclusión: Las auditorías mostraron el correcto seguimiento de dicho Protocolo para la mayoría de los criterios evaluados, si bien, ponen de manifiesto la necesidad de realizar estrategias periódicas de intensificación y recuerdo para garantizar el adecuado cumplimiento de todas las recomendaciones establecidas.

          Translated abstract

          ABSTRACT Objective: To analyze the degree of compliance with the “Guidelines for the safe use of potassium chloride” implemented in our hospital, using periodic audits, during the period 2013-2016. Methods: Descriptive study of the audits carried out at 6 months post-implementation (beginning of 2013) and then every year (2014-2016). The evaluation indicators were developed following the recommendations included in the Guidelines and referred to storage, prescription, preparation and administration of potassium solutions. The patient care units evaluated are: critical care authorized units (storage and independent double checks during preparation of solutions and before its administration) and all patient care units (prescription and correct labeling for its correct administration). Results: There were audited 55 patient care units, which showed a compliance of 100% for the prescription and correct labeling indicators. Of those units, 12 (critical and emergency units) are authorized to have concentrated potassium chloride ampoules 1M. These 12 units did not have a correct compliance with the other two indicators, because one unit did not show a correct storage (in 2014) and the double check required was not verified by 3 units in 2013, one in 2014 and 2015. Conclusion: The audits showed the correct follow-up with the Guidelines for most of the evaluated criteria, however demonstrated the need to carry out periodic strategies of intensification and remembrance to guarantee the correct compliance of all the established recommendations.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Towards an International Classification for Patient Safety: key concepts and terms

          Background Understanding the patient safety literature has been compromised by the inconsistent use of language. Objectives To identify key concepts of relevance to the International Patient Safety Classification (ICPS) proposed by the World Alliance For Patient Safety of the World Health Organization (WHO), and agree on definitions and preferred terms. Methods Six principles were agreed upon—that the concepts and terms should: be applicable across the full spectrum of healthcare; be consistent with concepts from other WHO Classifications; have meanings as close as possible to those in colloquial use; convey the appropriate meanings with respect to patient safety; be brief and clear, without unnecessary or redundant qualifiers; be fit-for-purpose for the ICPS. Results Definitions and preferred terms were agreed for 48 concepts of relevance to the ICPS; these were described and the relationships between them and the ICPS were outlined. Conclusions The consistent use of key concepts, definitions and preferred terms should pave the way for better understanding, for comparisons between facilities and jurisdictions, and for trends to be tracked over time. Changes and improvements, translation into other languages and alignment with other sets of patient safety definitions will be necessary. This work represents the start of an ongoing process of progressively improving a common international understanding of terms and concepts relevant to patient safety.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Learning from error: identifying contributory causes of medication errors in an Australian hospital.

            To study the clinical contexts contributing to harmful medication errors. A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews was conducted between March and August 2005 at Fremantle Hospital, a 450-bed metropolitan teaching hospital. Twenty-six of 46 staff members (57%) identified by pharmacy staff as having contributed to a significant medication error were interviewed. Interviews were recorded and transcribed for thematic analysis. Most errors were due to slips in attention that occurred during routine prescribing, dispensing or drug administration. Knowledge-based mistakes (eg, failure to follow a protocol) also contributed to prescribing errors. Errors were more likely to occur during tasks being carried out after hours by busy, distracted staff, often in relation to unfamiliar patients. Communication problems with senior staff and difficulty accessing appropriate drug dosing information contributed to knowledge-based prescribing errors. Several medical staff were unaware they had committed an error until their involvement with our study. Contextual factors that contributed to slips, lapses and knowledge-based mistakes in our sample are likely to be widespread in hospitals, and their impact on medication error may be substantial. Staff need training in how to recognise and deal with error-prone clinical situations. Safe prescribing practices (eg, the absolute requirement to acquire information before prescribing unfamiliar drugs) must be emphasised. Improved access to drug information at the point of prescribing, attention to communication barriers, and increasing staffing levels in particular areas are other potential strategies for reducing error.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Design of a safer approach to intravenous drug infusions: failure mode effects analysis.

              A set of standard processes was developed for delivering continuous drug infusions in order to improve (1) patient safety; (2) efficiency in staff workflow; (3) hemodynamic stability during infusion changes, and (4) efficient use of resources. Failure modes effects analysis (FMEA) was used to examine the impact of process changes on the reliability of delivering drug infusions. An 11 bed multidisciplinary pediatric ICU in the children's hospital of an academic medical center staffed by board certified pediatric intensivists. The hospital uses computerized physician order entry for all medication orders. A multidisciplinary team characterized key elements of the drug infusion process. The process was enhanced to increase overall reliability and the original and revised processes were compared using FMEA. Resource consumption was estimated by reviewing purchasing and pharmacy records for the calendar year after full implementation of the revised process. Staff satisfaction was evaluated using an anonymous questionnaire administered to staff nurses in the ICU and pediatric residents who had rotated through the ICU. The original process was characterized by six elements: selecting the drug; selecting a dose; selecting an infusion rate; calculating and ordering the infusion; preparing the infusion; programming the infusion pump and delivering the infusion. The following practice changes were introduced: standardizing formulations for all infusions; developing database driven calculators; extending infusion hang times from 24 to 72 hours; changing from bedside preparation by nurses to pharmacy prepared or premanufactured solutions. FMEA showed that the last three elements of the original process had high risk priority numbers (RPNs) of >225 whereas the revised process had no elements with RPNs >100. The combined effect of prolonging infusion hang times, preparation in the pharmacy, and purchasing premanufactured solutions resulted in 1500 fewer infusions prepared by nurses per year. Nursing staff expressed a significant preference and pediatric residents unanimously expressed a strong preference for the revised process. Standardization of infusion delivery reduced the frequency for completing the most unreliable elements of the process and reduced the riskiness of the individual elements. Both contribute to a safer system.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                ars
                Ars Pharmaceutica (Internet)
                Ars Pharm
                Universidad de Granada (Granada, Granada, Spain )
                2340-9894
                June 2017
                : 58
                : 2
                : 67-73
                Affiliations
                [1] A Coruña orgnameComplexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña
                Article
                S2340-98942017000200004 S2340-9894(17)05800200004
                10.30827/ars.v58i2.6381
                6b44cadc-6cef-4e3b-bd7f-1e94be9db60c

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 05 April 2017
                : 22 March 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 23, Pages: 7
                Product

                SciELO Spain

                Categories
                Originales Breves

                evaluation indicators,Potassium chloride,guidelines,Cloruro potásico,protocolo,indicadores evaluación

                Comments

                Comment on this article