13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Typological analysis of public-private partnerships in the veterinary domain

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) are defined as a collaborative approach in which the public and private sector share resources, responsibilities and risks to achieve common objectives and mutual benefits in a sustainable manner. PPPs are identified as a key solution to reinforce Veterinary Services. However only limited information is available on the scope, added value and enabling factors of PPPs in this sector. The aims of this study were to develop a typology of PPPs in the veterinary field and to identify key success factors and obstacles to their implementation. A structured questionnaire was sent to all 181 World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) Member Countries and to 47 private contacts. 36 different variables characterizing PPP initiatives were collected. 97 examples of PPPs were retrieved from 76 countries. Dimensionality reduction techniques were combined with clustering and discrimination methods to establish a typology of PPPs and to derive a set of simple rules to classify new instances of PPPs. Three clusters were identified, separated according to two main variables: the type of private partners and the type of interaction. Cluster 1, transactional PPPs, represented the traditional understanding of PPPs by Veterinary Services, initiated and funded by the public sector, giving service delivery accreditation to mostly private veterinarians; cluster 2, collaborative PPPs, included partnerships between producer associations and public Veterinary Services, driven by trade interests; cluster 3, transformational PPPs, represented joint programs initiated and funded by private companies and initially driven by business development objectives. Specific success factors and key obstacles affecting the performances and sustainability of these initiatives were identified for each cluster. This study represents the first practical attempt to develop a meaningful typology of PPPs in the field of animal health and to identify fundamental obstacles currently inhibiting the development of PPPs, and suggests ways to support national Veterinary Services in overcoming these obstacles.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Public-private partnerships: Perspectives on purposes, publicness, and good governance

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The dynamics of contractual and relational governance: Evidence from long-term public–private procurement arrangements

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Global public-private partnerships: Part I--A new development in health?

              The proliferation of public-private partnerships is rapidly reconfiguring the international health landscape. This article (part I of two on the subject) traces the changing nature of partnership, and discusses the definitional and conceptual ambiguities surrounding the term. After defining global public-private partnerships (GPPPs) for health development, we analyse the factors which have led to the convergence of public and private actors and discuss the consequences of the trend toward partnership between UN agencies (including the World Bank) and commercial entities in the health sector. Generic factors such as globalization and disillusionment with the UN, and factors specific to the health sector, such as market failure in product development for orphan diseases, are examined. Reviewed are the interests, policies, practices and concerns of the UN, the private-for-profit sector, bilateral organizations, and governments of low-income countries with respect to public-private partnership. While GPPPs bring much needed resources to problems of international health, we highlight concerns regarding this new organizational format. Part II, which will be published in the May issue of the Bulletin, presents a conceptual framework for analysing health GPPPs and explores the issues raised.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: Writing – original draft
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: ResourcesRole: SupervisionRole: ValidationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Formal analysisRole: ValidationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Project administrationRole: ResourcesRole: ValidationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ValidationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: ResourcesRole: SupervisionRole: ValidationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                31 October 2019
                2019
                : 14
                : 10
                : e0224079
                Affiliations
                [1 ] World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE), Paris, France
                [2 ] CIRAD, UMR ASTRE, Montpellier, France, ASTRE, CIRAD, INRA, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France
                University of Lincoln, UNITED KINGDOM
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0439-9779
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0887-3418
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5061-4241
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5469-0631
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1573-6833
                Article
                PONE-D-19-09707
                10.1371/journal.pone.0224079
                6822735
                31671123
                6b483a62-82b8-4289-904c-4e3c230c74bf
                © 2019 Galière et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 10 April 2019
                : 5 October 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 12, Tables: 3, Pages: 22
                Funding
                Funded by: funder-id http://data.crossref.org/fundingdata/funder/10.13039/100000865, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation;
                Award ID: OPP1159705
                Award Recipient :
                This work has been supported by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation under the grant number: OPP1159705.
                Categories
                Research Article
                People and Places
                Population Groupings
                Professions
                Veterinarians
                Social Sciences
                Sociology
                Consortia
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Veterinary Science
                Veterinary Diseases
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Research Design
                Survey Research
                Surveys
                People and Places
                Geographical Locations
                Africa
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Veterinary Science
                Veterinary Medicine
                Veterinary Diagnostics
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Research Design
                Survey Research
                Questionnaires
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Public and Occupational Health
                Custom metadata
                All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article