0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Language corpus and data driven learning (DDL) in language classrooms: A systematic review

      research-article
      a , , a , b
      Heliyon
      Elsevier
      Corpus, Corpora, Data-driven learning, Systematic review

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This systematic review presents a comprehensive analysis of the literature on the use of corpora and data-driven learning (DDL) in language education. Corpus linguistics encompasses the use of electronic text collections for linguistic analysis, while DDL entails using corpora for pedagogical purposes in second/foreign language teaching. DDL allows language educators to move beyond traditional methods to enhance teaching practices and learning skills. An extensive database search identified 89 pertinent studies published between 1997 and 2022 that met the inclusion criteria. The selected studies focused on keywords such as "DDL," "corpus linguistics," and related phrases to identify relevant literature discussing DDL interventions in language classrooms. Only English, peer-reviewed texts with accessible PDFs were considered for inclusion. These studies described DDL implementation in classroom settings and the common pedagogical practices, difficulties, and limitations encountered. The findings suggest that DDL has significant potential as a pedagogical tool, but challenges exist that limit its positive impact on language learning. Tailored tasks, auxiliary guidance, supplemental support, and peer/group learning were identified as effective strategies for facilitating meaningful corpus engagement for lower-proficiency students.

          Related collections

          Most cited references151

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

          The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did, and what they found. Over the past decade, advances in systematic review methodology and terminology have necessitated an update to the guideline. The PRISMA 2020 statement replaces the 2009 statement and includes new reporting guidance that reflects advances in methods to identify, select, appraise, and synthesise studies. The structure and presentation of the items have been modified to facilitate implementation. In this article, we present the PRISMA 2020 27-item checklist, an expanded checklist that details reporting recommendations for each item, the PRISMA 2020 abstract checklist, and the revised flow diagrams for original and updated reviews.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement

            Systematic reviews should build on a protocol that describes the rationale, hypothesis, and planned methods of the review; few reviews report whether a protocol exists. Detailed, well-described protocols can facilitate the understanding and appraisal of the review methods, as well as the detection of modifications to methods and selective reporting in completed reviews. We describe the development of a reporting guideline, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses for Protocols 2015 (PRISMA-P 2015). PRISMA-P consists of a 17-item checklist intended to facilitate the preparation and reporting of a robust protocol for the systematic review. Funders and those commissioning reviews might consider mandating the use of the checklist to facilitate the submission of relevant protocol information in funding applications. Similarly, peer reviewers and editors can use the guidance to gauge the completeness and transparency of a systematic review protocol submitted for publication in a journal or other medium.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              The echo chamber effect on social media

              Significance We explore the key differences between the main social media platforms and how they are likely to influence information spreading and the formation of echo chambers. To assess the different dynamics, we perform a comparative analysis on more than 100 million pieces of content concerning controversial topics (e.g., gun control, vaccination, abortion) from Gab, Facebook, Reddit, and Twitter. The analysis focuses on two main dimensions: 1) homophily in the interaction networks and 2) bias in the information diffusion toward like-minded peers. Our results show that the aggregation in homophilic clusters of users dominates online dynamics. However, a direct comparison of news consumption on Facebook and Reddit shows higher segregation on Facebook.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Heliyon
                Heliyon
                Heliyon
                Elsevier
                2405-8440
                22 November 2023
                December 2023
                22 November 2023
                : 9
                : 12
                : e22731
                Affiliations
                [a ]Cyprus International University (Dept. of ELT), Haspolat, Lefkoşa, Cyprus
                [b ]Cyprus International University, Cyprus, Haspolat, Lefkoşa, Cyprus
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author. amelalosta1111@ 123456yahoo.com
                Article
                S2405-8440(23)09939-5 e22731
                10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22731
                10724676
                38107320
                6b7dc4ef-c846-4965-9e24-c5fb9314d3be
                © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 19 February 2023
                : 11 November 2023
                : 17 November 2023
                Categories
                Research Article

                corpus,corpora,data-driven learning,systematic review
                corpus, corpora, data-driven learning, systematic review

                Comments

                Comment on this article