21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Comprehensive Audiometric Analysis of Hearing Impairment and Tinnitus After Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy in Survivors of Adult-Onset Cancer

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          Cisplatin is widely used but highly ototoxic. Effects of cumulative cisplatin dose on hearing loss have not been comprehensively evaluated in survivors of adult-onset cancer.

          Patients and Methods

          Comprehensive audiological measures were conducted on 488 North American male germ cell tumor (GCT) survivors in relation to cumulative cisplatin dose, including audiograms (0.25 to 12 kHz), tests of middle ear function, and tinnitus. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association criteria defined hearing loss severity. The geometric mean of hearing thresholds (0.25 to 12 kHz) summarized overall hearing status consistent with audiometric guidelines. Patients were sorted into quartiles of hearing thresholds of age- and sex-matched controls.

          Results

          Increasing cumulative cisplatin dose (median, 400 mg/m 2; range, 200 to 800 mg/m 2) was significantly related to hearing loss at 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 kHz ( P trends, .021 to < .001): every 100 mg/m 2 increase resulted in a 3.2-dB impairment in age-adjusted overall hearing threshold (4 to 12 kHz; P < .001). Cumulative cisplatin doses > 300 mg/m 2 were associated with greater American Speech-Language-Hearing Association–defined hearing loss severity (odds ratio, 1.59; P = .0066) and worse normative-matched quartiles (odds ratio, 1.33; P = .093) compared with smaller doses. Almost one in five (18%) patients had severe to profound hearing loss. Tinnitus (40% patients) was significantly correlated with reduced hearing at each frequency ( P < .001). Noise-induced damage (10% patients) was unaffected by cisplatin dose ( P = .59). Hypertension was significantly related ( P = .0066) to overall hearing threshold (4 to 12 kHz) in age- and cisplatin dose–adjusted analyses. Middle ear deficits occurred in 22.3% of patients but, as expected, were not related to cytotoxic drug dosage.

          Conclusion

          Follow-up of adult-onset cancer survivors given cisplatin should include routine inquiry for hearing status and tinnitus, referral to audiologists as clinically indicated, and hypertension control. Patients should be urged to avoid noise exposure, ototoxic drugs, and other factors that further damage hearing.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          Statistics

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Guidelines on Testicular Cancer: 2015 Update.

            This is an update of the previous European Association of Urology testis cancer guidelines published in 2011, which included major changes in the diagnosis and treatment of germ cell tumours.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Factors influencing help seeking, hearing aid uptake, hearing aid use and satisfaction with hearing aids: a review of the literature.

              This descriptive summary of the literature provides an overview of the available studies (published between January 1980 and January 2009) on correlates of help-seeking behavior for hearing loss, hearing-aid uptake, hearing-aid use, and satisfaction with the device. Publications were identified by structured searches in Pubmed and Cinahl and by inspecting the reference lists of relevant articles. The articles covered different stages that a person with hearing impairment may go through: prior to hearing aid fitting, the period covering the fitting and the period post hearing aid fitting. Inclusion of articles occurred according to strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data were extracted by two independent researchers. Thirty-nine papers were included that identified 31 factors examined in relation to the four outcome measures. These covered personal factors (e.g., source of motivation, expectation, attitude), demographic factors (e.g., age, gender) and external factors (e.g., cost, counseling). Only two studies covered the actual fitting process. There was only one factor positively affecting all four outcome variables. This was self-reported hearing disability. The vast majority of studies showed no relationship of age and gender with any of the outcome domains. Whereas research of the last 28 years yielded valuable information regarding relevant and irrelevant factors in hearing aid health care, there are still many relevant issues that have never been investigated in controlled studies. These are discussed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Clin Oncol
                J. Clin. Oncol
                jco
                jco
                JCO
                Journal of Clinical Oncology
                American Society of Clinical Oncology
                0732-183X
                1527-7755
                10 August 2016
                27 June 2016
                : 34
                : 23
                : 2712-2720
                Affiliations
                [1]Robert D. Frisina, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL; Heather E. Wheeler, Loyola University Chicago; M. Eileen Dolan, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Sophie D. Fossa, Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospital, Oslo, Norway; Sarah L. Kerns, Chunkit Fung, and Eileen M. Johnson, J.P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester; Darren R. Feldman and Amy Budnick, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Howard D. Sesso, Brigham and Women’s Hospital; Clair J. Beard, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Patrick O. Monahan, Shirin Ardeshir-Rouhani-Fard, Lawrence H. Einhorn, and Lois B. Travis, Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Robert Hamilton, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON; David J. Vaughn, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; and Steven E. Lipshultz, Children’s Hospital of Michigan, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI.
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Lawrence H. Einhorn, MD, Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, 535 Barnhill Drive, RT432, Indianapolis, IN 46202; e-mail: leinhorn@ 123456iupui.edu .

                R.D.F. and H.E.W. are co-first authors.

                Article
                PMC5019759 PMC5019759 5019759 668822
                10.1200/JCO.2016.66.8822
                5019759
                27354478
                6b8200bb-9d62-473a-a235-24f416a4d960
                © 2016 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
                History
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 1, Equations: 1, References: 60, Pages: 9
                Categories
                Guc12
                Psc12
                ORIGINAL REPORTS
                Treatment-Related Complications
                Custom metadata
                v1

                Comments

                Comment on this article