7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Call for Papers: Green Renal Replacement Therapy: Caring for the Environment

      Submit here before July 31, 2024

      About Blood Purification: 3.0 Impact Factor I 5.6 CiteScore I 0.83 Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Two Cardiovascular Risk Factors in One? Homocysteine and Its Relation to Glomerular Filtration Rate

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: Hyperhomocysteinemia is thought to be an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease, but the association between renal dysfunction and homocysteine may not have been fully taken into account. We performed a meta-analysis of studies that report correlations between glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and homocysteine plasma levels. Methods: Using a prespecified research strategy, we identified 41 studies involving 26,617 participants that reported Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficients for the association between 1/GFR and homocysteine. The summary correlation coefficients with 95% CI were obtained by pooling the logarithmic Z values derived from the individual trial correlation coefficients. Subgroup analysis was performed to compare results for measured GFR using clearance methods and various estimates of GFR. Results: The pooled correlation coefficient between homocysteine and 1/GFR was 0.37 (CI 0.32–0.40, p < 0.0001). The correlation coefficient based on various estimates of GFR was 0.33 (CI 0.29–0.38, p < 0.0001), and for measured GFR it was 0.45 (CI 0.39–0.51, p < 0.0001). The correlation coefficient was higher when GFR was measured using clearance methods compared with various estimates GFR (1.36 [CI 1.13–1.65], p = 0.0014). Conclusions: Homocysteine plasma levels significantly depend on renal function. This correlation is even more robust when GFR is measured using clearance methods. Therefore, in order to assess whether homocysteine is an independent cardiovascular risk factor, accurate adjustments for renal dysfunction are essential.

          Related collections

          Most cited references57

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Relation between renal dysfunction and cardiovascular outcomes after myocardial infarction.

          The presence of coexisting conditions has a substantial effect on the outcome of acute myocardial infarction. Renal failure is associated with one of the highest risks, but the influence of milder degrees of renal impairment is less well defined. As part of the Valsartan in Acute Myocardial Infarction Trial (VALIANT), we identified 14,527 patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by clinical or radiologic signs of heart failure, left ventricular dysfunction, or both, and a documented serum creatinine measurement. Patients were randomly assigned to receive captopril, valsartan, or both. The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was estimated by means of the four-component Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation, and the patients were grouped according to their estimated GFR. We used a 70-candidate variable model to adjust and compare overall mortality and composite cardiovascular events among four GFR groups. The distribution of estimated GFR was wide and normally shaped, with a mean (+/-SD) value of 70+/-21 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 of body-surface area. The prevalence of coexisting risk factors, prior cardiovascular disease, and a Killip class of more than I was greatest among patients with a reduced estimated GFR (less than 45.0 ml per minute per 1.73 m2), and the use of aspirin, beta-blockers, statins, or coronary-revascularization procedures was lowest in this group. The risk of death or the composite end point of death from cardiovascular causes, reinfarction, congestive heart failure, stroke, or resuscitation after cardiac arrest increased with declining estimated GFRs. Although the rate of renal events increased with declining estimated GFRs, the adverse outcomes were predominantly cardiovascular. Below 81.0 ml per minute per 1.73 m2, each reduction of the estimated GFR by 10 units was associated with a hazard ratio for death and nonfatal cardiovascular outcomes of 1.10 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.08 to 1.12), which was independent of the treatment assignment. Even mild renal disease, as assessed by the estimated GFR, should be considered a major risk factor for cardiovascular complications after a myocardial infarction. Copyright 2004 Massachusetts Medical Society
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Homocysteine lowering with folic acid and B vitamins in vascular disease.

            In observational studies, lower homocysteine levels are associated with lower rates of coronary heart disease and stroke. Folic acid and vitamins B6 and B12 lower homocysteine levels. We assessed whether supplementation reduced the risk of major cardiovascular events in patients with vascular disease. We randomly assigned 5522 patients 55 years of age or older who had vascular disease or diabetes to daily treatment either with the combination of 2.5 mg of folic acid, 50 mg of vitamin B6, and 1 mg of vitamin B12 or with placebo for an average of five years. The primary outcome was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, and stroke. Mean plasma homocysteine levels decreased by 2.4 micromol per liter (0.3 mg per liter) in the active-treatment group and increased by 0.8 micromol per liter (0.1 mg per liter) in the placebo group. Primary outcome events occurred in 519 patients (18.8 percent) assigned to active therapy and 547 (19.8 percent) assigned to placebo (relative risk, 0.95; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.84 to 1.07; P=0.41). As compared with placebo, active treatment did not significantly decrease the risk of death from cardiovascular causes (relative risk, 0.96; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.81 to 1.13), myocardial infarction (relative risk, 0.98; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.85 to 1.14), or any of the secondary outcomes. Fewer patients assigned to active treatment than to placebo had a stroke (relative risk, 0.75; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.59 to 0.97). More patients in the active-treatment group were hospitalized for unstable angina (relative risk, 1.24; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.04 to 1.49). Supplements combining folic acid and vitamins B6 and B12 did not reduce the risk of major cardiovascular events in patients with vascular disease. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00106886; Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN14017017.). Copyright 2006 Massachusetts Medical Society.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Homocysteine and Risk of Ischemic Heart Disease and Stroke

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                KBR
                Kidney Blood Press Res
                10.1159/issn.1420-4096
                Kidney and Blood Pressure Research
                S. Karger AG
                1420-4096
                1423-0143
                2008
                September 2008
                18 March 2008
                : 31
                : 4
                : 259-267
                Affiliations
                Departments of aCardiovascular Medicine and bMedicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif., and cCalifornia Institute of Technology, Pasadena, Calif.,USA; dDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Medical School, Hannover, Germany
                Article
                142725 Kidney Blood Press Res 2008;31:259–267
                10.1159/000142725
                18689992
                6b9e9e59-d6c8-41c5-b71d-08821b458a43
                © 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel

                Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

                History
                : 24 June 2008
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 1, References: 81, Pages: 9
                Categories
                Original Paper

                Cardiovascular Medicine,Nephrology
                Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula,Kidney,Meta-analysis,Risk factors,Homocysteine,Cockcroft-Gault equation,Glomerular filtration rate

                Comments

                Comment on this article