0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Colorectal Cancer Screening Interventions in 2 Health Care Systems Serving Disadvantaged Populations: Screening Uptake and Cost-Effectiveness

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          BACKGROUND:

          The objectives of the current study were to assess changes in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening uptake and the cost-effectiveness of implementing multiple evidence-based interventions (EBIs). EBIs were implemented at 2 federally qualified health centers that participated in the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment’s Clinic Quality Improvement for Population Health initiative.

          METHODS:

          Interventions included patient and provider reminder systems (health system 1), provider assessment and feedback (health systems 1 and 2), and numerous support activities (health systems 1 and 2). The authors evaluated health system 1 from July 2013 to June 2015 and health system 2 from July 2014 to June 2017. Evaluation measures included annual CRC screening uptake, EBIs implemented, funds received and expended by each health system to implement EBIs, and intervention costs to the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment and health systems.

          RESULTS:

          CRC screening uptake increased by 18 percentage points in health system 1 and 10 percentage points in health system 2. The improvements in CRC screening uptake, not including the cost of the screening tests, were obtained at an added cost ranging from $24 to $29 per person screened.

          CONCLUSIONS:

          In both health systems, the multicomponent interventions implemented likely resulted in improvements in CRC screening. The results suggest that significant increases in CRC screening uptake can be achieved in federally qualified health centers when appropriate technical support and health system commitment are present. The cost estimates of the multicomponent interventions suggest that these interventions and support activities can be implemented in a cost-effective manner.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          0374236
          2771
          Cancer
          Cancer
          Cancer
          0008-543X
          1097-0142
          3 November 2018
          25 October 2018
          01 November 2018
          29 November 2018
          : 124
          : 21
          : 4130-4136
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Denver, Colorado
          [2 ]RTI International, Waltham, Massachusetts
          [3 ]Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
          Author notes
          Corresponding author: Christen L. Lara, BA, Public Health Informatics Program, Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, 4300 Cherry Creek Drive S, Denver, CO 80246; christen.lara@ 123456state.co.us

          AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

          Christen L. Lara: Data collection and analysis, writing–original draft, and writing–review and editing. Kelly L. Means: Writing–original draft and writing–review and editing. Krystal D. Morwood: Writing–original draft and writing–review and editing. Westley R. Lighthall: Writing–original draft and writing–review and editing. Sonja Hoover: Data collection and analysis, writing–original draft, and writing–review and editing. Florence K.L. Tangka: Conceptualization, writing–original draft, and writing-review and editing. Cynthia French: Project administration and writing–review and editing. Krystal D. Gayle: Project administration and writing–review and editing. Amy DeGroff Project administration and writing–review and editing. Sujha Subramanian: Conceptualization, data collection and analysis, writing–original draft, and writing–review and editing.

          This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.

          Author information
          https://orcid.org/http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6205-1212
          https://orcid.org/http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2415-9721
          Article
          PMC6263828 PMC6263828 6263828 hhspa995394
          10.1002/cncr.31691
          6263828
          30359479
          6bb49544-ce14-4ccd-b8e7-0c58a86b89bb
          History
          Categories
          Article

          cancer screening,Colorado,colorectal cancer,cost-effective,evaluation

          Comments

          Comment on this article