11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
3 collections
    0
    shares

      Submit your digital health research with an established publisher
      - celebrating 25 years of open access

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Authors’ Response to Peer Reviews of “Are We Sure We Fully Understand What an Infodemic Is? A Global Perspective on Infodemiological Problems”

      author-comment

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references7

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Systematic Literature Review on the Spread of Health-related Misinformation on Social Media

          Contemporary commentators describe the current period as “an era of fake news” in which misinformation, generated intentionally or unintentionally, spreads rapidly. Although affecting all areas of life, it poses particular problems in the health arena, where it can delay or prevent effective care, in some cases threatening the lives of individuals. While examples of the rapid spread of misinformation date back to the earliest days of scientific medicine, the internet, by allowing instantaneous communication and powerful amplification has brought about a quantum change. In democracies where ideas compete in the marketplace for attention, accurate scientific information, which may be difficult to comprehend and even dull, is easily crowded out by sensationalized news. In order to uncover the current evidence and better understand the mechanism of misinformation spread, we report a systematic review of the nature and potential drivers of health-related misinformation. We searched PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, Scopus and Google databases to identify relevant methodological and empirical articles published between 2012 and 2018. A total of 57 articles were included for full-text analysis. Overall, we observe an increasing trend in published articles on health-related misinformation and the role of social media in its propagation. The most extensively studied topics involving misinformation relate to vaccination, Ebola and Zika Virus, although others, such as nutrition, cancer, fluoridation of water and smoking also featured. Studies adopted theoretical frameworks from psychology and network science, while co-citation analysis revealed potential for greater collaboration across fields. Most studies employed content analysis, social network analysis or experiments, drawing on disparate disciplinary paradigms. Future research should examine susceptibility of different sociodemographic groups to misinformation and understand the role of belief systems on the intention to spread misinformation. Further interdisciplinary research is also warranted to identify effective and tailored interventions to counter the spread of health-related misinformation online.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Peer Review of “Are We Sure We Fully Understand What an Infodemic Is? A Global Perspective on Infodemiological Problems”

              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Peer Review of “Are We Sure We Fully Understand What an Infodemic Is? A Global Perspective on Infodemiological Problems”

              (2022)

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                JMIRx Med
                JMIRx Med
                JMIRxMed
                JMIRx Med
                JMIR Publications (Toronto, Canada )
                2563-6316
                Jul-Sep 2022
                21 July 2022
                : 3
                : 3
                : e40636
                Affiliations
                [1 ] R&C Research Bovezzo (Brescia) Italy
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Alessandro Rovetta rovetta.mresearch@ 123456gmail.com
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4634-279X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5316-1719
                Article
                v3i3e40636
                10.2196/40636
                10414482
                6bb96fd7-b201-4d76-a511-9b0b81320847
                ©Alessandro Rovetta, Lucia Castaldo. Originally published in JMIRx Med (https://med.jmirx.org), 21.07.2022.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIRx Med, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://med.jmirx.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

                History
                : 29 June 2022
                : 29 June 2022
                Categories
                Authors' Response to Peer Reviews
                Authors' Response to Peer Reviews

                communication,conspiracy,covid-19,education,fake news,infodemic,infodemiology,mass media,public health,risk perception,science

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log