4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Prognostic impact of ESR1 mutations in ER+ HER2- MBC patients prior treated with first line AI and palbociclib: An exploratory analysis of the PADA-1 trial.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          1010

          Background: The question of which is the best endocrine partner to CDK4/6 inhibitors in first line for ER+ HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC) remains open. ESR1 mutations might be of paramount importance, as they confer resistance to AI but not to SERD. In pts treated with first line palbociclib-AI combination (PADA-1 trial, NCT03079011), we investigated ESR1mut detection rate at inclusion, prior to any therapy, and their prognostic impact. Methods: The PADA-1 phase 3 trial (NCT03079011, UCBG-GINECO) evaluates the utility of monitoring the onset of ESR1mut in cell-free DNA (with a ddPCR assay [Jeannot et al, Oncogene 2020]) of pts receiving AI-palbociclib in first line. Included pts had no prior therapy for MBC and no overt resistance to AI. Results: N = 1017 ER+ HER2- MBC pts were included in 22 months from 04/2017 and had their cfDNA tested for ESR1mut at inclusion and during therapy. N = 33/1017 pts had a detectable circulating ESR1mut at inclusion (3.2%, 95%CI [2.2;4.5]), ESR1mut positivity being associated with a prior exposure to AI in the adjuvant setting (p < 0.01). N = 1 pt died after 1 month on treatment. In N = 25/32 evaluable pts (78%), ESR1mut became undetectable in cfDNA (AF < 0.1%) within the first 5 months on treatment, with a median time to ESR1mut ‘clearance’ of 34 days. Among these 25 pts, 14 pts (56%) had ESR1mut detected again during therapy; 2 pts (8%) experienced a progression with no ESR1mut detected; the remaining 9 patients (36%) were still both ESR1mut -free and progression-free at time of analysis. With a median FU time of 12.4 months (range: 0-25.3m) under AI-palbociclib, the 33 ESR1mut-positive pts had a shorter PFS (median: 17.5mo, 95%CI[10.5-NR]) than the 984 ESR1mut-negative pts (median not reached), with an estimated HR = 2.8 [1.6;5.0]. Updated data will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: ESR1mut are rarely detected in the cfDNA of ER+ HER2- MBC patients with no overt resistance to AI. The quick ‘clearance’ of ESR1mut under treatment and the observed 17.5 months-long median PFS both suggest that the AI-palbociclib combination retain a clinical activity in this population. ESR1mut-positivity prior was however associated with a significantly shorter PFS, suggesting that ESR1mut positivity at baseline could accelerate the onset of resistance to AI-palbociclib. These findings may put into perspective the incoming results of the PARSIFAL trial. Clinical trial information: NCT03079011 .

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Journal of Clinical Oncology
          JCO
          American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
          0732-183X
          1527-7755
          May 20 2020
          May 20 2020
          : 38
          : 15_suppl
          : 1010
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Centre René Huguenin, Saint Cloud, France;
          [2 ]Institut Curie, Paris, France;
          [3 ]Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud–IUCT Oncopole, Toulouse, France;
          [4 ]Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France;
          [5 ]Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France;
          [6 ]INSERM U1245, IRON Group, Centre Henri Becquerel, University Hospital, University of Normandy, Rouen, France;
          [7 ]Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France;
          [8 ]Université de Paris, HIPI INSERM U976, Breast Diseases Unit, AP-HP, Hôpital Saint Louis, Paris, France;
          [9 ]Hopital Bretonneau, Tours, France;
          [10 ]Unicancer, Paris, France;
          [11 ]Institut Claudius Regaud, IUCT-Oncopole, Laboratoire de Biologie Médicale Oncologique, Toulouse, France;
          [12 ]CHI Fréjus St-Raphaël, Frejus, France;
          [13 ]ORACLE, Centre d'Oncologie de Gentilly, Gentilly, France;
          [14 ]Clinique de la Sauvegarde, Lyon, France;
          [15 ]Biostatistics Unit, INSERM U900, Institut Curie, Paris, France;
          [16 ]Medical Oncology Department, CARIO-HPCA and Cooperative Gynecological Cancer Research Group (GINECO), Plerin, France;
          [17 ]Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France;
          Article
          10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.1010
          6bb98f42-e163-457d-aed3-3cb93d63801b
          © 2020
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article