33
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Corneal Epithelial Findings in Patients with Multiple Myeloma Treated with Antibody–Drug Conjugate Belantamab Mafodotin in the Pivotal, Randomized, DREAMM-2 Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) represent an unmet clinical need. Belantamab mafodotin (belamaf; GSK2857916) is a first-in-class antibody–drug conjugate (ADC; or immunoconjugate) that delivers a cytotoxic payload, monomethyl auristatin F (MMAF), to myeloma cells. In the phase II DREAMM-2 study (NCT03525678), single-agent belamaf (2.5 mg/kg) demonstrated clinically meaningful anti-myeloma activity (overall response rate 32%) in patients with heavily pretreated disease. Microcyst-like epithelial changes (MECs) were common, consistent with reports from other MMAF-containing ADCs.

          Methods

          Corneal examination findings from patients in DREAMM-2 were reviewed, and the clinical descriptions and accompanying images (slit lamp microscopy and in vivo confocal microscopy [IVCM]) of representative events were selected. A literature review on corneal events reported with other ADCs was performed.

          Results

          In most patients receiving single-agent belamaf (72%; 68/95), MECs were observed by slit lamp microscopy early in treatment (69% had their first event by dose 4). However, IVCM revealed hyperreflective material. Blurred vision (25%) and dry eye (15%) were commonly reported symptoms. Management of MECs included dose delays (47%)/reductions (25%), with few patients discontinuing due to MECs (1%). The first event resolved in most patients (grade ≥2 MECs and visual acuity [each 77%], blurred vision [67%], and dry eye [86%]), with no reports of permanent vision loss to date. A literature review confirmed that similar MECs were reported with other ADCs; however, event management strategies varied. The pathophysiology of MECs is unclear, though the ADC cytotoxic payload may contribute to on- or off-target effects on corneal epithelial cells.

          Conclusion

          Single-agent belamaf represents a new treatment option for patients with RRMM. As with other ADCs, MECs were observed and additional research is warranted to determine their pathophysiology. A multidisciplinary approach, involving close collaboration between eye care professionals and hematologist/oncologists, is needed to determine appropriate diagnosis and management of these patients.

          Trial Registration

          ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier, NCT03525678.

          Related collections

          Most cited references64

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          International Myeloma Working Group consensus criteria for response and minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma.

          Treatment of multiple myeloma has substantially changed over the past decade with the introduction of several classes of new effective drugs that have greatly improved the rates and depth of response. Response criteria in multiple myeloma were developed to use serum and urine assessment of monoclonal proteins and bone marrow assessment (which is relatively insensitive). Given the high rates of complete response seen in patients with multiple myeloma with new treatment approaches, new response categories need to be defined that can identify responses that are deeper than those conventionally defined as complete response. Recent attempts have focused on the identification of residual tumour cells in the bone marrow using flow cytometry or gene sequencing. Furthermore, sensitive imaging techniques can be used to detect the presence of residual disease outside of the bone marrow. Combining these new methods, the International Myeloma Working Group has defined new response categories of minimal residual disease negativity, with or without imaging-based absence of extramedullary disease, to allow uniform reporting within and outside clinical trials. In this Review, we clarify several aspects of disease response assessment, along with endpoints for clinical trials, and highlight future directions for disease response assessments.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Revised International Staging System for Multiple Myeloma: A Report From International Myeloma Working Group.

            The clinical outcome of multiple myeloma (MM) is heterogeneous. A simple and reliable tool is needed to stratify patients with MM. We combined the International Staging System (ISS) with chromosomal abnormalities (CA) detected by interphase fluorescent in situ hybridization after CD138 plasma cell purification and serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) to evaluate their prognostic value in newly diagnosed MM (NDMM).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Multiple Myeloma

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                afarooq@bsd.uchicago.edu
                Journal
                Ophthalmol Ther
                Ophthalmol Ther
                Ophthalmology and Therapy
                Springer Healthcare (Cheshire )
                2193-8245
                2193-6528
                25 July 2020
                25 July 2020
                December 2020
                : 9
                : 4
                : 889-911
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.412578.d, ISNI 0000 0000 8736 9513, University of Chicago Medical Center, ; Chicago, IL USA
                [2 ]GRID grid.83440.3b, ISNI 0000000121901201, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, ; London, UK
                [3 ]GRID grid.52996.31, ISNI 0000 0000 8937 2257, University College London Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, ; London, UK
                [4 ]GRID grid.189967.8, ISNI 0000 0001 0941 6502, Emory Eye Center, , Emory University, ; Atlanta, GA USA
                [5 ]GRID grid.189967.8, ISNI 0000 0001 0941 6502, Emory University, Winship Cancer Institute, ; Atlanta, GA USA
                [6 ]GRID grid.412722.0, ISNI 0000 0004 0515 3663, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, ; Salt Lake City, UT USA
                [7 ]GRID grid.223827.e, ISNI 0000 0001 2193 0096, Moran Eye Center, , University of Utah, ; Salt Lake City, UT USA
                [8 ]GRID grid.411024.2, ISNI 0000 0001 2175 4264, University of Maryland School of Medicine, ; Baltimore, MD USA
                [9 ]GRID grid.411024.2, ISNI 0000 0001 2175 4264, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, , University of Maryland School of Medicine, ; Baltimore, MD USA
                [10 ]GRID grid.412647.2, ISNI 0000 0000 9209 0955, University of Wisconsin, Carbone Cancer Center, ; Madison, WI USA
                [11 ]GRID grid.418019.5, ISNI 0000 0004 0393 4335, GlaxoSmithKline, ; Upper Providence, PA USA
                Article
                280
                10.1007/s40123-020-00280-8
                7708586
                32712806
                6bdc08fc-a9df-40bd-823c-82788f7c76ad
                © The Author(s) 2020, corrected publication 2020

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 21 April 2020
                Categories
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2020

                antibody–drug conjugate,belantamab mafodotin,cornea,in vivo confocal microscopy,microcyst-like epithelial changes,monomethyl auristatin f,multiple myeloma,oncology

                Comments

                Comment on this article