13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Call for Papers: Sex and Gender in Neurodegenerative Diseases

      Submit here before September 30, 2024

      About Neurodegenerative Diseases: 3.0 Impact Factor I 4.3 CiteScore I 0.695 Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Early Motor Evoked Potentials in Acute Stroke: Adjunctive Measure to MRI for Assessment of Prognosis in Acute Stroke within 6 Hours

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: In acute stroke, a magnetic resonance (MR) perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) mismatch (PWI>DWI mismatch) may indicate tissue at risk for infarction and poor prognosis. However, different to early enthusiasm about this surrogate marker, its validity has shown several drawbacks in individual patients. Rather than relying on imaging, we evaluated motor evoked potentials (MEP) as a measure of cerebral function in the acute stroke setting. Methods: Thirteen patients with acute hemiparetic stroke underwent time to peak PWI and DWI within 6 h after onset as well as recordings of early MEP of first dorsal interosseous muscles. Outcome was assessed by the Unified Neurological Stroke Scale and Barthel Index at day 42. Results: Of 8 patients with PWI>DWI mismatch, 4 patients with normal MEP had a good clinical outcome and 4 patients with absent or pathological MEP had an unfavourable outcome (p < 0.05, Fisher’s exact test). In all patients without PWI>DWI mismatch, MEP findings predicted clinical outcome. Normal MEP at day 0 – but not PWI/DWI findings – significantly correlated with a good clinical outcome. Conclusions: Early MEP recordings in acute stroke patients provide valid prognostic information; they may become more useful for specific treatment decisions than presently available MRI surrogate parameters.

          Related collections

          Most cited references11

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Diffusion- and perfusion-weighted MRI response to thrombolysis in stroke

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Early recanalisation in acute ischaemic stroke saves tissue at risk defined by MRI.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Longitudinal study of central motor conduction time following stroke. 2. Central motor conduction measured within 72 h after stroke as a predictor of functional outcome at 12 months.

              A longitudinal study was performed on 118 first-ever stroke patients to evaluate neurophysiological measurements of central motor conduction time (CMCT) in the period immediately following stroke as predictors of functional outcome and mortality at 12 months. Measurements of CMCT were made as described in the accompanying article (Heald et al., 1993, Brain, 116, 1355-1370), in which the following three groups of patients were recognized within 12-72 h after the onset of symptoms: normal response group, delayed response group and no response group. Neurophysiological and clinical investigations were commenced 12-72 h (designated as day 1) after the onset of symptoms and repeated at set time intervals up to 12 months. The subjects were examined neurologically and assessed using the Motricity Index for muscle strength, the Nine-hole Peg Test to measure manual dexterity, the Barthel Score for activities of daily living and the modified Rankin Scale for functional outcome. The duration of stay in hospital and the occurrence of stroke-related death were noted. During the first week following stroke, absence of responses correlated closely with the patient's symptoms and neurological observations of abnormal muscle tone and tendon reflexes. Correlations were made in the three groups of patients of functional scores at day 1 and at 12 months. Patients with normal CMCT had consistently higher scores throughout the 12 month period and achieved significantly better functional recovery. Patients with no responses showed poor performance in neurological and functional tests throughout the 12 month period. Patients with delayed CMCT had neurological and functional scores intermediate between those of the other two groups, but outcome at 12 months was similar to those in the normal response group. Where the threshold to cortical stimulation was abnormally high, functional outcome was generally poor. Mortality was highest in the group with absent responses and the survivors spent the longest period in hospital. In conclusion, the observation of normal or delayed CMCT at day 1 identifies a group of patients with a high probability of survival and functional recovery. The absence of responses to cortical stimulation at day 1 identifies a group of patients who are at high risk of poor functional recovery at 12 months and greater probability of stroke-related death during this period.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                CED
                Cerebrovasc Dis
                10.1159/issn.1015-9770
                Cerebrovascular Diseases
                S. Karger AG
                1015-9770
                1421-9786
                2004
                August 2004
                05 August 2004
                : 18
                : 2
                : 130-134
                Affiliations
                Department of Neurology, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
                Article
                79265 Cerebrovasc Dis 2004;18:130–134
                10.1159/000079265
                15218278
                6bddefa5-bf13-443e-ae2f-c6eabb0f1db6
                © 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel

                Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

                History
                : 04 August 2003
                : 20 January 2004
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 2, References: 22, Pages: 5
                Categories
                Original Paper

                Geriatric medicine,Neurology,Cardiovascular Medicine,Neurosciences,Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry,Public health
                Ischaemic stroke,Magnetic resonance imaging,Motor evoked potentials

                Comments

                Comment on this article