33
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Hypo-fractionated SBRT for localized prostate cancer: a German bi-center single treatment group feasibility trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          For prostate cancer treatment, treatment options with minimal side effects are desired. External beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is non-invasive, standard of care and delivered in either conventional fractionation over 8 weeks or with moderate hypo-fractionation over about 5 weeks. Recent advances in radiotherapy technology have made extreme hypo-fractionated stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) of prostate cancer feasible, which has not yet been introduced as a standard treatment method in Germany. Initial results from other countries are promising, but long-term results are not yet available. The aim of this study is to investigate feasibility and effectiveness of SBRT for prostate cancer in Germany.

          Methods/design

          This German bi-center single group trial (HYPOSTAT) is designed to evaluate feasibility and effectiveness, as measured by toxicity and PSA-response, respectively, of an extreme hypo-fractionated SBRT regimen with five fractions of 7 Gy in treatment of localized low and intermediate risk prostate cancer. The target volume includes the prostate with or without the base of seminal vesicles depending on risk stratification and uncertainty margins that are kept at 3–5 mm. SBRT treatment is delivered with the robotic CyberKnife system, which was recently introduced in Germany. Acute and late toxicity after one year will be evaluated according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v. 4.0), Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Scores. The quality of life will be assessed before and after treatment with the EORTC QLQ C30 questionnaire. Hypothesizing that the proportion of patients with grade 2 side effects or higher is less or equal than 2.8%, thus markedly lower than the standard EBRT percentage (17.5%), the recruitment target is 85 patients.

          Discussion

          The HYPOSTAT trial aims at demonstrating short term feasibility of extreme hypo-fractioned SBRT for the treatment of prostate cancer and might be used as the pilot study for a multi-center multi-platform or for randomized-controlled trials comparing conventional radiotherapy with SBRT for localized prostate cancer in the future. The study concept of patient enrollment, follow up and evaluation by multiple public university clinics and actual patient treatment in dedicated private radiosurgery practices with high-tech radiation equipment is unique for clinical trials.

          Study status

          The study is ongoing and currently recruiting patients.

          Trial registration

          Registration number: NCT02635256 ( clinicaltrials.gov). Registered 8 December 2015.

          Related collections

          Most cited references46

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Randomized Phase III Noninferiority Study Comparing Two Radiotherapy Fractionation Schedules in Patients With Low-Risk Prostate Cancer.

          Conventional radiotherapy (C-RT) treatment schedules for patients with prostate cancer typically require 40 to 45 treatments that take place from > 8 to 9 weeks. Preclinical and clinical research suggest that hypofractionation-fewer treatments but at a higher dose per treatment-may produce similar outcomes. This trial was designed to assess whether the efficacy of a hypofractionated radiotherapy (H-RT) treatment schedule is no worse than a C-RT schedule in men with low-risk prostate cancer.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Radiation dose-volume effects in radiation-induced rectal injury.

            The available dose/volume/outcome data for rectal injury were reviewed. The volume of rectum receiving >or=60 Gy is consistently associated with the risk of Grade >or=2 rectal toxicity or rectal bleeding. Parameters for the Lyman-Kutcher-Burman normal tissue complication probability model from four clinical series are remarkably consistent, suggesting that high doses are predominant in determining the risk of toxicity. The best overall estimates (95% confidence interval) of the Lyman-Kutcher-Burman model parameters are n = 0.09 (0.04-0.14); m = 0.13 (0.10-0.17); and TD(50) = 76.9 (73.7-80.1) Gy. Most of the models of late radiation toxicity come from three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy dose-escalation studies of early-stage prostate cancer. It is possible that intensity-modulated radiotherapy or proton beam dose distributions require modification of these models because of the inherent differences in low and intermediate dose distributions. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Improved clinical outcomes with high-dose image guided radiotherapy compared with non-IGRT for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer.

              To compare toxicity profiles and biochemical tumor control outcomes between patients treated with high-dose image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) and high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for clinically localized prostate cancer. Between 2008 and 2009, 186 patients with prostate cancer were treated with IGRT to a dose of 86.4 Gy with daily correction of the target position based on kilovoltage imaging of implanted prostatic fiducial markers. This group of patients was retrospectively compared with a similar cohort of 190 patients who were treated between 2006 and 2007 with IMRT to the same prescription dose without, however, implanted fiducial markers in place (non-IGRT). The median follow-up time was 2.8 years (range, 2-6 years). A significant reduction in late urinary toxicity was observed for IGRT patients compared with the non-IGRT patients. The 3-year likelihood of grade 2 and higher urinary toxicity for the IGRT and non-IGRT cohorts were 10.4% and 20.0%, respectively (p = 0.02). Multivariate analysis identifying predictors for grade 2 or higher late urinary toxicity demonstrated that, in addition to the baseline Internatinoal Prostate Symptom Score, IGRT was associated with significantly less late urinary toxicity compared with non-IGRT. The incidence of grade 2 and higher rectal toxicity was low for both treatment groups (1.0% and 1.6%, respectively; p = 0.81). No differences in prostate-specific antigen relapse-free survival outcomes were observed for low- and intermediate-risk patients when treated with IGRT and non-IGRT. For high-risk patients, a significant improvement was observed at 3 years for patients treated with IGRT compared with non-IGRT. IGRT is associated with an improvement in biochemical tumor control among high-risk patients and a lower rate of late urinary toxicity compared with high-dose IMRT. These data suggest that, for definitive radiotherapy, the placement of fiducial markers and daily tracking of target positioning may represent the preferred mode of external-beam radiotherapy delivery for the treatment of prostate cancer. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                ping.jiang@pius-hospital.de
                krockenberger@zks.uni-luebeck.de
                reinhard.vonthein@imbs.uni-luebeck.de
                jane.tereszczuk@web.de
                schreiber@zks.uni-luebeck.de
                liebau@zks.uni-luebeck.de
                huttenlocher@saphir-rc.com
                detlef.imhoff@kgu.de
                panagiotis.balermpas@kgu.de
                chrsitian.keller@kgu.de
                kathrin.dellas@uksh.de
                rene.baumann@uksh.de
                clausmichael.roedel@kgu.de
                guido.hildebrandt@uni-rostock.de
                klaus-peter.juenemann@uksh.de
                axel.merseburger@uksh.de
                akatzmd@msn.com
                ziegler@imbs.uni-luebeck.de
                oliver.blanck@uksh.de
                juergen.dunst@uksh.de
                Journal
                Radiat Oncol
                Radiat Oncol
                Radiation Oncology (London, England)
                BioMed Central (London )
                1748-717X
                18 August 2017
                18 August 2017
                2017
                : 12
                : 138
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0646 2097, GRID grid.412468.d, Klinik für Strahlentherapie, , Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, ; Kiel, Germany
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0275 7806, GRID grid.477704.7, Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinik für Medizinische Strahlenphysik, , Pius Hospital, ; Oldenburg, Germany
                [3 ]Universität zu Lübeck, ZKS, Lübeck, Germany
                [4 ]GRID grid.37828.36, Institut für Medizinische Biometrie und Statistik, , Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, ; Lübeck, Germany
                [5 ]GRID grid.477821.f, , Saphir Radiochirurgie Zentrum Norddeutschland und Frankfurt am Main, ; Güstrow, Germany
                [6 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0578 8220, GRID grid.411088.4, Klinik für Strahlentherapie, , Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, ; Frankfurt, Germany
                [7 ]ISNI 0000 0000 9737 0454, GRID grid.413108.f, Klinik für Strahlentherapie, , Universitätsmedizin Rostock, ; Rostock, Germany
                [8 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0646 2097, GRID grid.412468.d, Klinik für Urologie, , Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, ; Kiel, Germany
                [9 ]GRID grid.37828.36, Klinik für Urologie, , Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, ; Lübeck, Germany
                [10 ]Flushing Radiation Oncology Services, New York, USA
                [11 ]Long Island Radiation Therapy, New York, USA
                [12 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0723 4123, GRID grid.16463.36, School of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science, , University of KwaZulu-Natal, ; Pietermaritzburg, South Africa
                [13 ]Department for Radiation Oncology, University Clinic Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
                [14 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0646 2097, GRID grid.412468.d, Department of Radiation Oncology, Karl Lennert Cancer Center, , University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, ; Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, Haus 50, D-24105 Kiel, Germany
                Article
                872
                10.1186/s13014-017-0872-2
                5562995
                28821268
                6be046c4-c83a-46c2-8ec7-85e3b12adb2e
                © The Author(s). 2017

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 9 June 2017
                : 10 August 2017
                Categories
                Study Protocol
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2017

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                clinical trial,localized prostate cancer,extreme hypo-fractionation,robotic radiosurgery,stereotactic body radiation therapy,cyberknife

                Comments

                Comment on this article