2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Racial and Ethnic Differences in Knowledge About One's Dementia Status

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To examine racial and ethnic differences in knowledge about one’s dementia status Prospective cohort study 2000-2014 Health and Retirement Study Our sample included 8,686 person-wave observations representing 4,065 unique survey participants age ≥70 with dementia, as identified by a well-validated statistical prediction model based on individual demographic and clinical characteristics. Primary outcome measure was knowledge of one’s dementia status as reported in the survey. Patient characteristics included race/ethnicity, age, gender, survey year, cognition, function, comorbidity, and whether living in a nursing home. Among subjects identified as having dementia by the prediction model, 43.5%-50.2%, depending on the survey year, reported that they were informed of the dementia status by their doctor. This proportion was lower among Hispanics (25.9%-42.2%) and non-Hispanic blacks (31,4%-50.5%) than among non-Hispanic Whites (47.7%-52.9%). Our fully-adjusted regression model indicated lower dementia awareness among non-Hispanic blacks (OR=0.74 95% CI: 0.58-0.94) and Hispanics (OR=0.60; 95% CI: 0.43-0.85), compared to non-Hispanic whites. Having more IADL limitations (OR=1.65, 95% CI: 1.56-1.75) and living in a nursing home (OR=2.78, 95% CI: 2.32-3.32) were associated with increased odds of subjects reporting being told about dementia by a physician. Less than half of individuals with dementia reported being told by a physician about the condition. A higher proportion of non-Hispanic black and Hispanic patients with dementia may be unaware of their condition, despite higher dementia prevalence in these groups, compared to non-Hispanic whites. Dementia outreach programs should target diverse communities with disproportionately high disease prevalence and low awareness.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Prevalence of Dementia in the United States: The Aging, Demographics, and Memory Study

          Aim: To estimate the prevalence of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other dementias in the USA using a nationally representative sample. Methods: The Aging, Demographics, and Memory Study sample was composed of 856 individuals aged 71 years and older from the nationally representative Health and Retirement Study (HRS) who were evaluated for dementia using a comprehensive in-home assessment. An expert consensus panel used this information to assign a diagnosis of normal cognition, cognitive impairment but not demented, or dementia (and dementia subtype). Using sampling weights derived from the HRS, we estimated the national prevalence of dementia, AD and vascular dementia by age and gender. Results: The prevalence of dementia among individuals aged 71 and older was 13.9%, comprising about 3.4 million individuals in the USA in 2002. The corresponding values for AD were 9.7% and 2.4 million individuals. Dementia prevalence increased with age, from 5.0% of those aged 71–79 years to 37.4% of those aged 90 and older. Conclusions: Dementia prevalence estimates from this first nationally representative population-based study of dementia in the USA to include subjects from all regions of the country can provide essential information for effective planning for the impending healthcare needs of the large and increasing number of individuals at risk for dementia as our population ages.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Implicit Bias among Physicians and its Prediction of Thrombolysis Decisions for Black and White Patients

            Context Studies documenting racial/ethnic disparities in health care frequently implicate physicians’ unconscious biases. No study to date has measured physicians’ unconscious racial bias to test whether this predicts physicians’ clinical decisions. Objective To test whether physicians show implicit race bias and whether the magnitude of such bias predicts thrombolysis recommendations for black and white patients with acute coronary syndromes. Design, Setting, and Participants An internet-based tool comprising a clinical vignette of a patient presenting to the emergency department with an acute coronary syndrome, followed by a questionnaire and three Implicit Association Tests (IATs). Study invitations were e-mailed to all internal medicine and emergency medicine residents at four academic medical centers in Atlanta and Boston; 287 completed the study, met inclusion criteria, and were randomized to either a black or white vignette patient. Main Outcome Measures IAT scores (normal continuous variable) measuring physicians’ implicit race preference and perceptions of cooperativeness. Physicians’ attribution of symptoms to coronary artery disease for vignette patients with randomly assigned race, and their decisions about thrombolysis. Assessment of physicians’ explicit racial biases by questionnaire. Results Physicians reported no explicit preference for white versus black patients or differences in perceived cooperativeness. In contrast, IATs revealed implicit preference favoring white Americans (mean IAT score = 0.36, P < .001, one-sample t test) and implicit stereotypes of black Americans as less cooperative with medical procedures (mean IAT score 0.22, P < .001), and less cooperative generally (mean IAT score 0.30, P < .001). As physicians’ prowhite implicit bias increased, so did their likelihood of treating white patients and not treating black patients with thrombolysis (P = .009). Conclusions This study represents the first evidence of unconscious (implicit) race bias among physicians, its dissociation from conscious (explicit) bias, and its predictive validity. Results suggest that physicians’ unconscious biases may contribute to racial/ethnic disparities in use of medical procedures such as thrombolysis for myocardial infarction.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Prevalence of cognitive impairment without dementia in the United States.

              Cognitive impairment without dementia is associated with increased risk for disability, increased health care costs, and progression to dementia. There are no population-based prevalence estimates of this condition in the United States. To estimate the prevalence of cognitive impairment without dementia in the United States and determine longitudinal cognitive and mortality outcomes. Longitudinal study from July 2001 to March 2005. In-home assessment for cognitive impairment. Participants in ADAMS (Aging, Demographics, and Memory Study) who were age 71 years or older drawn from the nationally representative HRS (Health and Retirement Study). Of 1770 selected individuals, 856 completed initial assessment, and of 241 selected individuals, 180 completed 16- to 18-month follow-up assessment. Assessments, including neuropsychological testing, neurologic examination, and clinical and medical history, were used to assign a diagnosis of normal cognition, cognitive impairment without dementia, or dementia. National prevalence rates were estimated by using a population-weighted sample. In 2002, an estimated 5.4 million people (22.2%) in the United States age 71 years or older had cognitive impairment without dementia. Prominent subtypes included prodromal Alzheimer disease (8.2%) and cerebrovascular disease (5.7%). Among participants who completed follow-up assessments, 11.7% with cognitive impairment without dementia progressed to dementia annually, whereas those with subtypes of prodromal Alzheimer disease and stroke progressed at annual rates of 17% to 20%. The annual death rate was 8% among those with cognitive impairment without dementia and almost 15% among those with cognitive impairment due to medical conditions. Only 56% of the nondeceased target sample completed the initial assessment. Population sampling weights were derived to adjust for at least some of the potential bias due to nonresponse and attrition. Cognitive impairment without dementia is more prevalent in the United States than dementia, and its subtypes vary in prevalence and outcomes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
                J Am Geriatr Soc
                Wiley
                0002-8614
                1532-5415
                August 2020
                April 13 2020
                August 2020
                : 68
                : 8
                : 1763-1770
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in HealthInstitute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center Boston Massachusetts USA
                [2 ]Survey Research CenterInstitute for Social Research, University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan USA
                [3 ]Alzheimerʼs Drug Discovery Foundation New York New York USA
                [4 ]Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center and Tufts University School of Medicine Boston Massachusetts USA
                Article
                10.1111/jgs.16442
                7552114
                32282058
                6bfbece3-4242-4810-80a6-c2b36ca209c1
                © 2020

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article