15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Spatiotemporal Overlap between the European Brown Hare and Its Potential Predators and Competitors

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Simple Summary

          Predator-prey relationships and competition shape interspecific coexistence in wildlife communities. So far, most published studies have focused on large carnivores and their prey, whereas little is known about medium and small-sized mammal communities. The European brown hare Lepus europaeus is a widespread species in Europe and is part of the diet of many birds of prey and mammalian carnivores of all sizes. Furthermore, competition with other herbivorous mammals at feeding sites has also been suggested. In an area in Central Italy, we have assessed spatiotemporal overlap among brown hare and its potential predators (red fox Vulpes vulpes, pine marten Martes martes, domestic cat Felis catus, and domestic dog Canis familiaris) and a competitor (roe deer Capreolus capreolus). We showed that, outside a fenced area excluding predators and competitors, brown hares become more nocturnal and more active on dark nights to limit encounters with predators, and that they adopt spatial partitioning to avoid competitors, as expected by ecological theory.

          Abstract

          Analysis of spatiotemporal partitioning is pivotal to shed light on interspecific coexistence. Most research effort has involved large-sized carnivores and their prey, whereas little attention has been devoted to lagomorphs. We assessed spatiotemporal overlap among the European brown hare Lepus europaeus and its potential competitors and predators through camera-trapping in an area in Central Italy. We estimated the interspecific patterns of the spatiotemporal activity rhythms of brown hares, its potential predators (the red fox Vulpes vulpes, the pine marten Martes martes, the domestic cat Felis catus, and the domestic dog Canis familiaris), and a competitor, the roe deer Capreolus capreolus. Brown hare activity was studied in natural conditions as well as in a fenced area that excluded terrestrial predators and competitors. Free-ranging hares developed a more nocturnal behavior to avoid diurnal predators (i.e., domestic carnivores and martens). Although high temporal overlap was observed between free-ranging brown hares and both red foxes (82%) and roe deer (81%), hares avoided fox by being more active on darkest nights, as well as avoided roe deer through spatial partitioning. We suggest that hares may adapt their spatiotemporal behavior to avoid potential predators and competitors.

          Related collections

          Most cited references92

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species Diversity

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Niche overlap and diffuse competition.

              E Pianka (1974)
              Current theory predicts a distinct upper limit on the permissible degree of niche overlap; moreover, theory suggests that maximal tolerable overlap should be relatively insensitive to environmental variability. Data presented here demonstrate that, within the lizard subset of natural desert communities, niche overlap decreases both with increasing environmental variability and with increasing numbers of lizard species. The latter two factors are themselves positively correlated. A partial correlation analysis is interpreted as indicating that the extent of tolerable niche overlap does not necessarily decrease due to environmental variability, but rather that overlap is probably more closely related to the number of potential interspecific competitors in a community, or what has been termed "diffuse competition." This result lends support to the "niche overlap hypothesis," which asserts that maximal tolerable overlap should vary inversely with the intensity of competition. Moreover, this empirical discovery indicates that niche overlap theory could be profitably expanded to incorporate the number of competing species. Although the average amount of overlap between pairs of species decreases with the intensity of diffuse competition, the overall degree of competitive inhibition tolerated by individuals comprising an average species could nevertheless remain relatively constant, provided that extensive niche overlap with a few competitors is roughly equivalent to lower average overlap with a greater number of competitors.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                Animals (Basel)
                Animals (Basel)
                animals
                Animals : an Open Access Journal from MDPI
                MDPI
                2076-2615
                21 February 2021
                February 2021
                : 11
                : 2
                : 562
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie, Università degli Studi di Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy; a.viviano@ 123456studenti.unipi.it
                [2 ]Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Istituto di Ricerca sugli Ecosistemi Terrestri, Via Madonna del Piano 10, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy
                [3 ]Dipartimento di Scienze Ambientali e Politiche–ESP, Università di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy; niccolo.fattorini@ 123456gmail.com
                [4 ]CREA Research Centre for Plant Protection and Certification, Cascine del Riccio, 50125 Firenze, Italy; giuseppe.mazza@ 123456crea.gov.it
                [5 ]Dipartimento di Scienze della Vita, Università di Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy; lazzerilorenzo12@ 123456gmail.com
                [6 ]Dipartimento di Biologia, dell’Università di Firenze, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy; alessandra.panichi@ 123456stud.unifi.it
                [7 ]Associazione Nazionale Libera Caccia, 58100 Grosseto, Italy; info@ 123456elettronicastrianese.com
                [8 ]Department of Biological and Geological Sciences, Faculty of Education, Ain Shams University, Roxy, Cairo 11566, Egypt; walidfathy2021@ 123456gmail.com
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: emiliano.mori@ 123456cnr.it
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2970-3389
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8108-7950
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8022-7464
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6644-1429
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9556-6204
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2028-4568
                Article
                animals-11-00562
                10.3390/ani11020562
                7924828
                33669965
                6c8f9335-460a-449f-930c-1c0bb8fcf7e6
                © 2021 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 28 January 2021
                : 18 February 2021
                Categories
                Article

                activity rhythms,camera-traps,lepus europaeus,moonlight avoidance,niche partitioning,spatiotemporal behavior,predator–prey systems

                Comments

                Comment on this article