12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Validation of the Tricuspid Annular Plane Systolic Excursion/Systolic Pulmonary Artery Pressure Ratio for the Assessment of Right Ventricular-Arterial Coupling in Severe Pulmonary Hypertension

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          The ratios of tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE)/echocardiographically measured systolic pulmonary artery pressure (PASP), fractional area change/invasively measured mean pulmonary artery pressure, right ventricular (RV) area change/end-systolic area, TAPSE/pulmonary artery acceleration time, and stroke volume/end-systolic area have been proposed as surrogates of RV-arterial coupling. The relationship of these surrogates with the gold standard measure of RV-arterial coupling (invasive pressure-volume loop-derived end-systolic/arterial elastance [Ees/Ea] ratio) and RV diastolic stiffness (end-diastolic elastance) in pulmonary hypertension remains incompletely understood. We evaluated the relationship of these surrogates with invasive pressure-volume loop-derived Ees/Ea and end-diastolic elastance in pulmonary hypertension.

          Methods:

          We performed right heart echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging 1 day before invasive measurement of pulmonary hemodynamics and single-beat RV pressure-volume loops in 52 patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension or chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. The relationships of the proposed surrogates with Ees/Ea and end-diastolic elastance were evaluated by Spearman correlation, multivariate logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristic analyses. Associations with prognosis were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis.

          Results:

          TAPSE/PASP, fractional area change/mean pulmonary artery pressure, RV area change/end-systolic area, and stroke volume/end-systolic area but not TAPSE/pulmonary artery acceleration time were correlated with Ees/Ea and end-diastolic elastance. Of the surrogates, only TAPSE/PASP emerged as an independent predictor of Ees/Ea (multivariate odds ratio: 18.6; 95% CI, 0.8–96.1; P =0.08). In receiver operating characteristic analysis, a TAPSE/PASP cutoff of 0.31 mm/mm Hg (sensitivity: 87.5% and specificity: 75.9%) discriminated RV-arterial uncoupling (Ees/Ea <0.805). Patients with TAPSE/PASP <0.31 mm/mm Hg had a significantly worse prognosis than those with higher TAPSE/PASP.

          Conclusions:

          Echocardiographically determined TAPSE/PASP is a straightforward noninvasive measure of RV-arterial coupling and is affected by RV diastolic stiffness in severe pulmonary hypertension.

          Clinical Trial Registration:

          URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT03403868.

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Comparing the Areas under Two or More Correlated Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves: A Nonparametric Approach

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Guidelines for the echocardiographic assessment of the right heart in adults: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography endorsed by the European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, and the Canadian Society of Echocardiography.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Understanding Bland Altman analysis

              In a contemporary clinical laboratory it is very common to have to assess the agreement between two quantitative methods of measurement. The correct statistical approach to assess this degree of agreement is not obvious. Correlation and regression studies are frequently proposed. However, correlation studies the relationship between one variable and another, not the differences, and it is not recommended as a method for assessing the comparability between methods.
In 1983 Altman and Bland (B&A) proposed an alternative analysis, based on the quantification of the agreement between two quantitative measurements by studying the mean difference and constructing limits of agreement.
The B&A plot analysis is a simple way to evaluate a bias between the mean differences, and to estimate an agreement interval, within which 95% of the differences of the second method, compared to the first one, fall. Data can be analyzed both as unit differences plot and as percentage differences plot.
The B&A plot method only defines the intervals of agreements, it does not say whether those limits are acceptable or not. Acceptable limits must be defined a priori, based on clinical necessity, biological considerations or other goals.
The aim of this article is to provide guidance on the use and interpretation of Bland Altman analysis in method comparison studies.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging
                Circ: Cardiovascular Imaging
                Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
                1941-9651
                1942-0080
                September 2019
                September 2019
                : 12
                : 9
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Internal Medicine (K.T., A.D., H.A.G., E.M., W.S., N.S., H.G., M.J.R.), Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Germany.
                [2 ]Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, National Pulmonary Embolism &amp; Pulmonary Vascular Diseases Research Group, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Diseases, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China (J.W.).
                [3 ]University of Arizona, Tucson (R.V.).
                [4 ]Department of Pneumology, Kerckhoff Heart, Rheuma and Thoracic Center, Bad Nauheim, Germany (H.A.G.).
                [5 ]Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, United Kingdom (H.A.G.).
                [6 ]Erasme University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium (R.N.).
                [7 ]Department of Radiology (F.R.), Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Germany.
                [8 ]Department of Pediatric Cardiology, University of Bonn, Germany (U.H.).
                Article
                10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.119.009047
                31500448
                6c9f8d19-52a0-40e9-97b5-a68a7cb3d0ec
                © 2019
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article