14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Call for Papers: Sex and Gender in Neurodegenerative Diseases

      Submit here before September 30, 2024

      About Neurodegenerative Diseases: 3.0 Impact Factor I 4.3 CiteScore I 0.695 Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Genetics of Cerebellar and Neocortical Expansion in Anthropoid Primates: A Comparative Approach

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          What adaptive changes in brain structure and function underpin the evolution of increased cognitive performance in humans and our close relatives? Identifying the genetic basis of brain evolution has become a major tool in answering this question. Numerous cases of positive selection, altered gene expression or gene duplication have been identified that may contribute to the evolution of the neocortex, which is widely assumed to play a predominant role in cognitive evolution. However, the components of the neocortex co-evolve with other functionally interdependent regions of the brain, most notably in the cerebellum. The cerebellum is linked to a range of cognitive tasks and expanded rapidly during hominoid evolution. Here we present data that suggest that, across anthropoid primates, protein-coding genes with known roles in cerebellum development were just as likely to be targeted by selection as genes linked to cortical development. Indeed, based on currently available gene ontology data, protein-coding genes with known roles in cerebellum development are more likely to have evolved adaptively during hominoid evolution. This is consistent with phenotypic data suggesting an accelerated rate of cerebellar expansion in apes that is beyond that predicted from scaling with the neocortex in other primates. Finally, we present evidence that the strength of selection on specific genes is associated with variation in the volume of either the neocortex or the cerebellum, but not both. This result provides preliminary evidence that co-variation between these brain components during anthropoid evolution may be at least partly regulated by selection on independent loci, a conclusion that is consistent with recent intraspecific genetic analyses and a mosaic model of brain evolution that predicts adaptive evolution of brain structure.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          BBE
          Brain Behav Evol
          10.1159/issn.0006-8977
          Brain, Behavior and Evolution
          S. Karger AG
          0006-8977
          1421-9743
          2017
          August 2017
          06 July 2017
          : 89
          : 4
          : 274-285
          Affiliations
          aDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, bEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, and cDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
          Author notes
          *Stephen H. Montgomery, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ (UK), E-Mail stephen.montgomery@cantab.net
          Author information
          https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5474-5695
          Article
          477432 PMC5637284 Brain Behav Evol 2017;89:274-285
          10.1159/000477432
          PMC5637284
          28683440
          6cbd8f1b-5e55-4117-aa60-a382fbc32593
          © 2017 The Author(s) Published by S. Karger AG, Basel

          This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY). Usage, derivative works and distribution are permitted provided that proper credit is given to the author and the original publisher.Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

          History
          : 16 January 2017
          : 10 May 2017
          Page count
          Figures: 2, Tables: 1, References: 102, Pages: 12
          Categories
          Original Paper

          Geriatric medicine,Neurology,Cardiovascular Medicine,Neurosciences,Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry,Public health
          Brain evolution,Cerebellum,Primates,Neocortex,Molecular evolution

          Comments

          Comment on this article