15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Evidence for GABA‐A receptor dysregulation in gambling disorder: correlation with impulsivity

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          As a behavioural addiction, gambling disorder (GD) provides an opportunity to characterize addictive processes without the potentially confounding effects of chronic excessive drug and alcohol exposure. Impulsivity is an established precursor to such addictive behaviours, and GD is associated with greater impulsivity. There is also evidence of GABAergic dysregulation in substance addiction and in impulsivity. This study therefore investigated GABA A receptor availability in 15 individuals with GD and 19 healthy volunteers (HV) using [ 11C]Ro15‐4513, a relatively selective α5 benzodiazepine receptor PET tracer and its relationship with impulsivity. We found significantly higher [ 11C]Ro15‐4513 total distribution volume ( V T ) in the right hippocampus in the GD group compared with HV. We found higher levels of the ‘Negative Urgency’ construct of impulsivity in GD, and these were positively associated with higher [ 11C]Ro15‐4513 V T in the amygdala in the GD group; no such significant correlations were evident in the HV group. These results contrast with reduced binding of GABAergic PET ligands described previously in alcohol and opiate addiction and add to growing evidence for distinctions in the neuropharmacology between substance and behavioural addictions. These results provide the first characterization of GABA A receptors in GD with [ 11C]Ro15‐4513 PET and show greater α5 receptor availability and positive correlations with trait impulsivity. This GABAergic dysregulation is potential target for treatment.

          Related collections

          Most cited references43

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Impulsivity as a vulnerability marker for substance-use disorders: review of findings from high-risk research, problem gamblers and genetic association studies.

          There is a longstanding association between substance-use disorders (SUDs) and the psychological construct of impulsivity. In the first section of this review, personality and neurocognitive data pertaining to impulsivity will be summarised in regular users of four classes of substance: stimulants, opiates, alcohol and 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA). Impulsivity in these groups may arise via two alternative mechanisms, which are not mutually exclusive. By one account, impulsivity may occur as a consequence of chronic exposure to substances causing harmful effects on the brain. By the alternative account, impulsivity pre-dates SUDs and is associated with the vulnerability to addiction. We will review the evidence that impulsivity is associated with addiction vulnerability by considering three lines of evidence: (i) studies of groups at high-risk for development of SUDs; (ii) studies of pathological gamblers, where the harmful consequences of the addiction on brain structure are minimised, and (iii) genetic association studies linking impulsivity to genetic risk factors for addiction. Within each of these three lines of enquiry, there is accumulating evidence that impulsivity is a pre-existing vulnerability marker for SUDs.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Integration of impulsivity and positive mood to predict risky behavior: development and validation of a measure of positive urgency.

            In 3 studies, the authors developed and began to validate a measure of the propensity to act rashly in response to positive affective states (positive urgency). In Study 1, they developed a content-valid 14-item scale, showed that the measure was unidimensional, and showed that positive urgency was distinct from impulsivity-like constructs identified in 2 models of impulsive behavior. In Study 2, they showed that positive urgency explained variance in risky behavior not explained by measures of other impulsivity-like constructs, differentially explained positive mood-based risky behavior, differentiated individuals at risk for problem gambling from those not at risk, and interacted with drinking motives and expectancies as predicted to explain problem drinking behavior. In Study 3, they confirmed the hypothesis that positive urgency differentiated alcoholics from both eating-disordered and control individuals. ((c) 2007 APA, all rights reserved).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Impulsivity and cognitive distortions in pathological gamblers attending the UK National Problem Gambling Clinic: a preliminary report

              Background Pathological gambling (PG) is a form of behavioural addiction that has been associated with elevated impulsivity and also cognitive distortions in the processing of chance, probability and skill. We sought to assess the relationship between the level of cognitive distortions and state and trait measures of impulsivity in treatment-seeking pathological gamblers. Method Thirty pathological gamblers attending the National Problem Gambling Clinic, the first National Health Service clinic for gambling problems in the UK, were compared with 30 healthy controls in a case-control design. Cognitive distortions were assessed using the Gambling-Related Cognitions Scale (GRCS). Trait impulsivity was assessed using the UPPS-P, which includes scales of urgency, the tendency to be impulsive in positive or negative mood states. Delay discounting rates were taken as a state measure of impulsive choice. Results Pathological gamblers had elevated impulsivity on several UPPS-P subscales but effect sizes were largest (Cohen's d>1.4) for positive and negative urgency. The pathological gamblers also displayed higher levels of gambling distortions, and elevated preference for immediate rewards, compared to controls. Within the pathological gamblers, there was a strong relationship between the preference for immediate rewards and the level of cognitive distortions (R 2=0.41). Conclusions Impulsive choice in the gamblers was correlated with the level of gambling distortions, and we hypothesize that an impulsive decision-making style may increase the acceptance of erroneous beliefs during gambling play.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                anne.lingford-hughes@imperial.ac.uk
                Journal
                Addict Biol
                Addict Biol
                10.1111/(ISSN)1369-1600
                ADB
                Addiction Biology
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1355-6215
                1369-1600
                13 October 2016
                November 2017
                : 22
                : 6 ( doiID: 10.1111/adb.2017.22.issue-6 )
                : 1601-1609
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Centre for Neuropsychopharmacology, Division of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine Imperial College London UK
                [ 2 ] Department of Psychobiology Universidade Federal de São Paulo Brazil
                [ 3 ] Centre for Affective Disorders, Department of Psychological Medicine Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London UK
                [ 4 ] Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences Institute of Psychiatry, King's College UK
                [ 5 ] Imanova Ltd. Centre for Imaging Sciences UK
                [ 6 ] Department of Neuroimaging Institute of Psychiatry, King's College UK
                [ 7 ] Department of Imaging, Division of Experimental Medicine, Department of Medicine Imperial College UK
                [ 8 ] National Problem Gambling Clinic, CNWL NHS Foundation Trust Imperial College London UK
                [ 9 ] Centre for Gambling Research at UBC, Department of Psychology University of British Columbia Canada
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence to: Anne R Lingford‐Hughes, Centre for Neuropsychopharmacology, Division of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, 160 Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK. E‐mail: anne.lingford-hughes@ 123456imperial.ac.uk
                [†]

                These authors contributed equally to this work.

                Article
                ADB12457 AB-05-2016-0127.R1
                10.1111/adb.12457
                5697606
                27739164
                6cc4c243-4585-4c88-896b-088fbf22f9e3
                © 2016 The Authors. Addiction Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society for the Study of Addiction

                This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 18 May 2016
                : 14 July 2016
                : 30 August 2016
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 3, Pages: 9, Words: 4126
                Funding
                Funded by: Medical Research Council
                Award ID: MRC G1002226
                Funded by: CAPES
                Award ID: PDSE 99999.014476/2013‐04
                Categories
                Original Article
                Human Neuroimaging Studies
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                adb12457
                November 2017
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:5.2.6 mode:remove_FC converted:21.11.2017

                Health & Social care
                gaba system,gambling disorder,[11c]ro15‐4513 pet
                Health & Social care
                gaba system, gambling disorder, [11c]ro15‐4513 pet

                Comments

                Comment on this article