8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Genomic Characterization of TP53–Wild-Type Esophageal Carcinoma 1

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Translated abstract

          Up to 40% of esophageal carcinomas have a biallelic intact TP53 gene. It is largely unclear how these carcinoma cells prevent apoptosis, what is the kind of pathway alterations, or whether therapeutically relevant alterations exist in this subgroup. We evaluated The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data to compare TP53-mutated with TP53–wild-type tumors regarding copy number variations, gene mutations, and expression patterns of protein-coding genes and miRNAs. Additionally, we analyzed up to 428 esophageal adenocarcinomas (EACs) in total using an ultra-deep parallel sequencing panel, immunohistochemistry, as well as fluorescence in situ hybridization. In the TCGA cohort, 17.3% has a biallelic intact TP53 gene. This group has a smaller average total size of somatic copy number variations. Some protein coding genes and miRNAs were differentially expressed between the TP53-wild-type and TP53-mutated group to emphasize mdm2, CCND2, TP73, or miRNA 150, 488, or 4662a. In addition, 50% of the TP53–wild-type tumors carry somatic mutations in at least one of the genes involved in the TP53 pathway. Our patient cohort revealed 41.3% TP53–wild-type tumors; 5.6% were MDM2 amplified. In accordance with the TCGA data, we did not find a prognostic relevance of TP53 in our tumor cohort as well. The mutation status of TP53 defines an important subtype in esophageal carcinoma. Our comprehensive molecular analysis revealed important and potentially therapeutically relevant genomic alterations in this subgroup.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Cloning of adiponectin receptors that mediate antidiabetic metabolic effects.

          Adiponectin (also known as 30-kDa adipocyte complement-related protein; Acrp30) is a hormone secreted by adipocytes that acts as an antidiabetic and anti-atherogenic adipokine. Levels of adiponectin in the blood are decreased under conditions of obesity, insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. Administration of adiponectin causes glucose-lowering effects and ameliorates insulin resistance in mice. Conversely, adiponectin-deficient mice exhibit insulin resistance and diabetes. This insulin-sensitizing effect of adiponectin seems to be mediated by an increase in fatty-acid oxidation through activation of AMP kinase and PPAR-alpha. Here we report the cloning of complementary DNAs encoding adiponectin receptors 1 and 2 (AdipoR1 and AdipoR2) by expression cloning. AdipoR1 is abundantly expressed in skeletal muscle, whereas AdipoR2 is predominantly expressed in the liver. These two adiponectin receptors are predicted to contain seven transmembrane domains, but to be structurally and functionally distinct from G-protein-coupled receptors. Expression of AdipoR1/R2 or suppression of AdipoR1/R2 expression by small-interfering RNA supports our conclusion that they serve as receptors for globular and full-length adiponectin, and that they mediate increased AMP kinase and PPAR-alpha ligand activities, as well as fatty-acid oxidation and glucose uptake by adiponectin.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Cellular senescence and tumor suppressor gene p16.

            Cellular senescence is an irreversible arrest of cell growth. Biochemical and morphological changes occur during cellular senescence, including the formation of a unique cellular morphology such as flattened cytoplasm. Function of mitochondria, endoplasmic reticulum and lysosomes are affected resulting in the inhibition of lysosomal and proteosomal pathways. Cellular senescence can be triggered by a number of factors including, aging, DNA damage, oncogene activation and oxidative stress. While the molecular mechanism of senescence involves p16 and p53 tumor suppressor genes and telomere shortening, this review is focused on the mechanism of p16 control. The p16-mediated senescence acts through the retinoblastoma (Rb) pathway inhibiting the action of the cyclin dependant kinases leading to G1 cell cycle arrest. Rb is maintained in a hypophosphorylated state resulting in the inhibition of transcription factor E2F1. Regulation of p16 expression is complex and involves epigenetic control and multiple transcription factors. PRC1 (Pombe repressor complex (1) and PRC2 (Pombe repressor complex (2) proteins and histone deacetylases play an important role in the promoter hypermethylation for suppressing p16 expression. While transcription factors YY1 and Id1 suppress p16 expression, transcription factors CTCF, Sp1 and Ets family members activate p16 transcription. Senescence occurs with the inactivation of suppressor elements leading to the enhanced expression of p16. Copyright © 2011 UICC.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              MicroRNA-34b and MicroRNA-34c are targets of p53 and cooperate in control of cell proliferation and adhesion-independent growth.

              MicroRNAs (miRNA) are a recently discovered class of noncoding RNAs that negatively regulate gene expression. Recent evidence indicates that miRNAs may play an important role in cancer. However, the mechanism of their deregulation in neoplastic transformation has only begun to be understood. To elucidate the role of tumor suppressor p53 in regulation of miRNAs, we have analyzed changes in miRNA microarray expression profile immediately after conditional inactivation of p53 in primary mouse ovarian surface epithelium cells. Among the most significantly affected miRNAs were miR-34b and miR-34c, which were down-regulated 12-fold according to quantitative reverse transcription-PCR analysis. Computational promoter analysis of the mir-34b/mir-34c locus identified the presence of evolutionarily conserved p53 binding sites approximately 3 kb upstream of the miRNA coding sequence. Consistent with evolutionary conservation, mir-34b/mir-34c were also down-regulated in p53-null human ovarian carcinoma cells. Furthermore, as expected from p53 binding to the mir-34b/c promoter, doxorubicin treatment of wild-type, but not p53-deficient, cells resulted in an increase of mir-34b/mir-34c expression. Importantly, miR-34b and miR-34c cooperate in suppressing proliferation and soft-agar colony formation of neoplastic epithelial ovarian cells, in agreement with the partially overlapping spectrum of their predicted targets. Taken together, these results show the existence of a novel mechanism by which p53 suppresses such critical components of neoplastic growth as cell proliferation and adhesion-independent colony formation.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Transl Oncol
                Transl Oncol
                Translational Oncology
                Neoplasia Press
                1936-5233
                11 October 2018
                January 2019
                11 October 2018
                : 12
                : 1
                : 154-161
                Affiliations
                [* ]Institute of Pathology, University of Cologne, Germany
                []Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University of Cologne, Germany
                []Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), University of Cologne, Germany
                [§ ]Indivumed Group, Hamburg, Germany
                Author notes
                [* ]Address all correspondence to: Alexander Quaas, Institute of Pathology, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany. alexander.quaas@ 123456uk-koeln.de
                [2]

                Contributed equally to this work.

                [3]

                Gastrointestinal Cancer Group Cologne (GCGC).

                Article
                S1936-5233(18)30389-9
                10.1016/j.tranon.2018.09.007
                6187090
                30317074
                6d32e7ec-6e4f-4bf3-bc8c-2a8ea13b6b91
                © 2018 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 13 August 2018
                : 9 September 2018
                : 10 September 2018
                Categories
                Original article

                Comments

                Comment on this article