44
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Huntingtin Functions as a Scaffold for Selective Macroautophagy

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Selective macroautophagy is an important protective mechanism against diverse cellular stresses. In contrast to the well-characterized starvation-induced autophagy, the regulation of selective autophagy is largely unknown. Here, we demonstrate that Huntingtin, the Huntington’s disease gene product, functions as a scaffold protein for selective macroautophagy but it is dispensable for nonselective macroautophagy. In Drosophila, Huntingtin genetically interacts with autophagy pathway components. In mammalian cells, Huntingtin physically interacts with the autophagy cargo receptor p62 to facilitate its association with the integral autophagosome component LC3 and with lysine-63-linked ubiquitin-modified substrates. Maximal activation of selective autophagy during stress is attained by the ability of Huntingtin to bind ULK1, a kinase that initiates autophagy, which releases ULK1 from negative regulation via mTOR. Our data uncover an important physiological function of Huntingtin and provide a missing link in the activation of selective macroautophagy in metazoans.

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A role for ubiquitin in selective autophagy.

          Ubiquitination is the hallmark of protein degradation by the 26S proteasome. However, the proteasome is limited in its capacity to degrade oligomeric and aggregated proteins. Removal of harmful protein aggregates is mediated by autophagy, a mechanism by which the cell sequesters cytosolic cargo and delivers it for degradation by the lysosome. Identification of autophagy receptors, such as p62/SQSTM1 and NBR1, which simultaneously bind both ubiquitin and autophagy-specific ubiquitin-like modifiers, LC3/GABARAP, has provided a molecular link between ubiquitination and autophagy. This review explores the hypothesis that ubiquitin represents a selective degradation signal suitable for targeting various types of cargo, ranging from protein aggregates to membrane-bound organelles and microbes.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Selective autophagy mediated by autophagic adapter proteins.

            Mounting evidence suggests that autophagy is a more selective process than originally anticipated. The discovery and characterization of autophagic adapters, like p62 and NBR1, has provided mechanistic insight into this process. p62 and NBR1 are both selectively degraded by autophagy and able to act as cargo receptors for degradation of ubiquitinated substrates. A direct interaction between these autophagic adapters and the autophagosomal marker protein LC3, mediated by a so-called LIR (LC3-interacting region) motif, their inherent ability to polymerize or aggregate as well as their ability to specifically recognize substrates are required for efficient selective autophagy. These three required features of autophagic cargo receptors are evolutionarily conserved and also employed in the yeast cytoplasm-to-vacuole targeting (Cvt) pathway and in the degradation of P granules in C. elegans. Here, we review the mechanistic basis of selective autophagy in mammalian cells discussing the degradation of misfolded proteins, p62 bodies, aggresomes, mitochondria and invading bacteria. The emerging picture of selective autophagy affecting the regulation of cell signaling with consequences for oxidative stress responses, tumorigenesis and innate immunity is also addressed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Nutrient starvation elicits an acute autophagic response mediated by Ulk1 dephosphorylation and its subsequent dissociation from AMPK.

              Macroautophagy (herein referred to as autophagy) is an evolutionarily conserved self-digestive process cells adapt to starvation and other stress responses. Upon starvation, autophagy is induced, providing cells with needed nutrient supplies. We report here that Unc-51-like kinase 1 (Ulk1), a key initiator for mammalian autophagy, undergoes dramatic dephosphorylation upon starvation, particularly at serine 638 and serine 758. Phosphorylations of Ulk1 are mediated by mammalian target-of-rapamycin (mTOR) kinase and adenosine monophosphate activated protein kinase (AMPK). AMPK interacts with Ulk1 in a nutrient-dependent manner. Proper phosphorylations on Ulk1 are crucial for Ulk1/AMPK association, as a single serine-to-alanine mutation (S758A) at Ulk1 impairs this interaction. Compared to the wild-type ULK1, this Ulk1-S758A mutant initiates starvation-induced autophagy faster at an early time point, but does not alter the maximum capacity of autophagy when starvation prolongs. This study therefore revealed previously unnoticed acute autophagy response to environmental changes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                100890575
                21417
                Nat Cell Biol
                Nat. Cell Biol.
                Nature cell biology
                1465-7392
                1476-4679
                3 February 2015
                16 February 2015
                March 2015
                01 September 2015
                : 17
                : 3
                : 262-275
                Affiliations
                [1 ]The Brown Foundation Institute of Molecular Medicine, The University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas Medical School at Houston, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHEALTH), 1825 Pressler Street, Houston, TX, 77030
                [2 ]Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy, The University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas Medical School at Houston, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHEALTH), 1825 Pressler Street, Houston, TX, 77030
                [3 ]Programs in Human and Molecular Genetics and Neuroscience, The University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas Medical School at Houston, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHEALTH), 1825 Pressler Street, Houston, TX, 77030
                [4 ]Department of Neurology, The University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas Medical School at Houston, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHEALTH), 1825 Pressler Street, Houston, TX, 77030
                [5 ]Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Jan and Dan Duncan Neurological Research Institute, 1250 Moursund Street, Houston, TX 77030
                [6 ]Program in Developmental Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Jan and Dan Duncan Neurological Research Institute, 1250 Moursund Street, Houston, TX 77030
                [7 ]Departments of Molecular and Human Genetics and Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Jan and Dan Duncan Neurological Research Institute, 1250 Moursund Street, Houston, TX 77030
                [8 ]Department of Development and Molecular Biology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York 10461
                [9 ]Department of Anatomy and Structural Biology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York 10461
                [10 ]Institute for Aging Studies, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York 10461
                Author notes
                [11]

                Equal contributions

                Article
                NIHMS651360
                10.1038/ncb3101
                4344873
                25686248
                6d371269-377a-431b-bfb9-65e87042a6ec
                History
                Categories
                Article

                Cell biology
                Cell biology

                Comments

                Comment on this article