14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Mechanisms of Creativity Differences Between Art and Non-art Majors: A Voxel-Based Morphometry Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Creativity is considered the ability to generate new ideas or behaviors, an ability that have diverse expressions in different human groups, such as painters and non-painters. Art major students require more creative activities than non-art students do. In this study, we plan to explore the figural creativity abilities of art major students and whether these students exhibited higher figural creativity scores and why their brain structure of gray matter are lower which may benefit from their professional training relative to non-art majors. Therefore, in this study, we use voxel-based morphometry (VBM) to identify different behavioral and brain mechanisms between art major students and non-art major students by using the figural Torrance Test of Creative Thinking. Our results showed that the TTCT-figural (TTCT-F) scores of art majors were higher than those of non-art majors. The TTCT-F score of art major students and practicing and study time have positive correlations which means art major’s figural creativity score benefit from there art professional training in some degree. Subsequently, the interaction analysis revealed that the TTCT-figural scores of art majors and non-majors exhibited significant correlations with the gray matter volumes (GMV) of the left anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and the left medial frontal gyrus (MFG). While the simple slope analysis showed that art majors, compared with non-art majors, exhibited a marginal significantly positive association with the left ACC and MFG, non-art majors exhibited a significantly negative association with the left ACC and MFG. Overall, our study revealed that people who major in artistic work are more likely to possess enhanced figural creative skills relative to non-artistic people. These results indicated that professional artistic programs or training may increase creativity skills via reorganized intercortical connections.

          Related collections

          Most cited references61

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Testing predictions from personality neuroscience. Brain structure and the big five.

          We used a new theory of the biological basis of the Big Five personality traits to generate hypotheses about the association of each trait with the volume of different brain regions. Controlling for age, sex, and whole-brain volume, results from structural magnetic resonance imaging of 116 healthy adults supported our hypotheses for four of the five traits: Extraversion, Neuroticism, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness. Extraversion covaried with volume of medial orbitofrontal cortex, a brain region involved in processing reward information. Neuroticism covaried with volume of brain regions associated with threat, punishment, and negative affect. Agreeableness covaried with volume in regions that process information about the intentions and mental states of other individuals. Conscientiousness covaried with volume in lateral prefrontal cortex, a region involved in planning and the voluntary control of behavior. These findings support our biologically based, explanatory model of the Big Five and demonstrate the potential of personality neuroscience (i.e., the systematic study of individual differences in personality using neuroscience methods) as a discipline.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A cognitive training program based on principles of brain plasticity: results from the Improvement in Memory with Plasticity-based Adaptive Cognitive Training (IMPACT) study.

            To investigate the efficacy of a novel brain plasticity-based computerized cognitive training program in older adults and to evaluate the effect on untrained measures of memory and attention and participant-reported outcomes. Multisite randomized controlled double-blind trial with two treatment groups. Communities in northern and southern California and Minnesota. Community-dwelling adults aged 65 and older (N=487) without a diagnosis of clinically significant cognitive impairment. Participants were randomized to receive a broadly-available brain plasticity-based computerized cognitive training program (intervention) or a novelty- and intensity-matched general cognitive stimulation program modeling treatment as usual (active control). Duration of training was 1 hour per day, 5 days per week, for 8 weeks, for a total of 40 hours. The primary outcome was a composite score calculated from six subtests of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status that use the auditory modality (RBANS Auditory Memory/Attention). Secondary measures were derived from performance on the experimental program, standardized neuropsychological assessments of memory and attention, and participant-reported outcomes. RBANS Auditory Memory/Attention improvement was significantly greater (P=.02) in the experimental group (3.9 points, 95% confidence interval (CI)=2.7-5.1) than in the control group (1.8 points, 95% CI=0.6-3.0). Multiple secondary measures of memory and attention showed significantly greater improvements in the experimental group (word list total score, word list delayed recall, digits backwards, letter-number sequencing; P<.05), as did the participant-reported outcome measure (P=.001). No advantage for the experimental group was seen in narrative memory. The experimental program improved generalized measures of memory and attention more than an active control program.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Can We Trust Creativity Tests? A Review of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT)

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                11 December 2018
                2018
                : 9
                : 2319
                Affiliations
                [1] 1School of Communication of East China Normal University , Shanghai, China
                [2] 2Department of Psychology, Southwest University , Chongqing, China
                [3] 3Key Laboratory of Cognition and Personality, Ministry of Education , Chongqing, China
                [4] 4College Students Psychological Counseling and Health Center, Party Committee Student Work Department, East China University of Technology , Nanchang, China
                [5] 5Institute of Cultural and Creative Industry of Shanghai Jiao Tong University , Shanghai, China
                [6] 6School of Sports and Health of East China Normal University , Shanghai, China
                Author notes

                Edited by: Wangbing Shen, Hohai University, China

                Reviewed by: Yuan Yuan, Nanjing Normal University, China; Fei Luo, Institute of Psychology (CAS), China

                *Correspondence: Bao Xueming, xmbao@ 123456tyxx.ecnu.edu.cn

                These authors have contributed equally to this work

                This article was submitted to Cognition, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02319
                6301215
                6d575b77-3719-4ec9-a099-c20767ec2164
                Copyright © 2018 Xurui, Yaxu, Qiangqiang, Yu, Bin and Xueming.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 13 June 2018
                : 05 November 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 4, Equations: 0, References: 78, Pages: 8, Words: 0
                Categories
                Psychology
                Original Research

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                creativity,art major students,non-art major students,gmv,mfg,acc
                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                creativity, art major students, non-art major students, gmv, mfg, acc

                Comments

                Comment on this article