0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Short interval intracortical inhibition responses to low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation under multiple interstimulus intervals and conditioning intensities

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The extent to which short interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) responds to low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) remains inconclusive with reports of increased, decreased and unchanged response following modulation. The aim of this study was to systematically investigate if the variability of SICI following rTMS is explained by the interstimulus interval (ISI) and/or the conditioning stimulus intensity (CSI).

          Methods

          Two experiments with pre/post-testing and an rTMS session (1 Hz, 90% RMT, 900 pulses) were done. Experiment I (N=15): SICI with multiple ISIs (1.0-4.0 ms, 0.2ms increment). Experiment II (N=15): SICI with CSIs (50-95% of RMT, 5% increment). In both experiments, the cortical silent period (cSP) was also collected.

          Results

          After low-frequency rTMS, no significant change (p>0.10) in SICI at any specific ISI or CSI was observed, nor did the optimal ISI or CSI change. However, a significant decrease was observed in SICI responses when assessed under the range of ISIs (p=0.0001), but not CSIs. cSP inhibition increased significantly (p<0.0015) for both experiments.

          Conclusions

          The optimal ISI or CSI did not shift or reveal SICI changes after inhibitory rTMS. However, when the whole curve of SICI responses were evaluated from a wide range of ISIs, a decrease in inhibition was found. The contrast between the results of individual ISI tests and the wide range of ISI assessment may be due to higher inter-subject variability of SICI and/or sample size, rendering traditional SICI testing methods ineffective for measuring changes in inhibition. Further, it is possible that rTMS modulates GABA A and GABA B mediated inhibitory processes differently, which would explain the conflicting results for SICI and cSP.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          9804159
          36468
          Neuromodulation
          Neuromodulation
          Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society
          1094-7159
          1525-1403
          9 February 2018
          22 March 2018
          June 2018
          01 June 2019
          : 21
          : 4
          : 368-375
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Division of Physical Therapy, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Minnesota. 426 Church St. SE, Minneapolis, MN, USA, 55455
          [2 ]Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota. F282/2A West Building. 2450 Riverside Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN 55454
          [3 ]Physical Therapy Department, Federal University of São Carlos. Rodovia Washington Luiz Km 235, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brasil, 13565-905
          [4 ]Department of Physical Therapy, MGH Institute of Health Professions Charlestown Navy Yard, 36 1st Ave, Boston, MA 02129
          Author notes
          [* ] Correspondence: Mo Chen, PhD. Tel: +1-612-624-5220. mchen@ 123456umn.edu
          Article
          PMC6033639 PMC6033639 6033639 nihpa940815
          10.1111/ner.12773
          6033639
          29566289
          6d65b684-e02d-4447-9ff1-602726fc3fde
          History
          Categories
          Article

          short interval intracortical inhibition,Neuromodulation,CSI,ISI,rTMS,TMS,SICI,conditioning intensity,interstimulus interval,transcranial magnetic stimulation

          Comments

          Comment on this article