47
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for direct visualization of microorganisms

      ,
      Journal of Microbiological Methods
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          As a technique allowing simultaneous visualization, identification, enumeration and localization of individual microbial cells, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is useful for many applications in all fields of microbiology. FISH not only allows the detection of culturable microorganisms, but also of yet-to-be cultured (so-called unculturable) organisms, and can therefore help in understanding complex microbial communities. In this review, methodological aspects, as well as problems and pitfalls of FISH are discussed in an examination of past, present and future applications.

          Related collections

          Most cited references76

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Measurement of in situ activities of nonphotosynthetic microorganisms in aquatic and terrestrial habitats.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Optimizing fluorescent in situ hybridization with rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes for flow cytometric identification of microorganisms.

            A combination of fluorescent rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes ("phylogenetic stains") and flow cytometry was used for a high resolution automated analysis of mixed microbial populations. Fixed cells of bacteria and yeasts were hybridized in suspension with fluorescein- or tetramethylrhodamine-labeled oligonucleotide probes complementary to group-specific regions of the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) molecules. Quantifying probe-conferred cell fluorescence by flow cytometry, we could discriminate between target and nontarget cell populations. We critically examined changes of the hybridization conditions, kinetics of the hybridization, and posthybridization treatments. Intermediate probe concentrations, addition of detergent to the hybridization buffer, and a posthybridization washing step were found to increase the signal to noise ratio. We could demonstrate a linear correlation between growth rate and probe-conferred fluorescence of Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas cepacia cells. Oligonucleotides labeled with multiple fluorochromes showed elevated levels of nonspecific binding and therefore could not be used to lower the detection limits, which still restrict studies with fluorescing rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes to well-growing microbial cells. Two probes of different specificities--one labeled with fluorescein, the other with tetramethylrhodamine--could be applied simultaneously for dual color analysis.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A tentative direct microscopic method for counting living marine bacteria.

              Yeast extract (0.025%) and nalidixic acid (0.002%) were added to seawater samples and the samples were incubated for 6 h at 20 degrees C in the dark. Under these conditions, bacterial cells did not divide but grew to form elongated cells that are easily recognized by a direct microscopic method and epifluorescent microscopic technique. The number of cells thus obtained is proposed as a direct cound of viable bacterial cells (DVC). With open ocean samples, DVC was higher than 'viable' plate counts by up to three orders of magnitude and lower than the direct counts by about one order.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal of Microbiological Methods
                Journal of Microbiological Methods
                Elsevier BV
                01677012
                July 2000
                July 2000
                : 41
                : 2
                : 85-112
                Article
                10.1016/S0167-7012(00)00152-4
                10991623
                6dab7d3a-c9d9-450f-b589-7a3ca381861d
                © 2000

                https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article